| Literature DB >> 24647124 |
Mushtaque Hussain1, Zafar Hussain Ibupoto2, Mazhar Ali Abbasi3, Xianjie Liu4, Omer Nur5, Magnus Willander6.
Abstract
In the present work, NiCo2O4 nanostructures are fabricated in three dimensions (3D) on nickel foam by the hydrothermal method. The nanomaterial was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The nanostructures exhibit nanoneedle-like morphology grown in 3D with good crystalline quality. The nanomaterial is composed of nickel, cobalt and oxygen atoms. By using the favorable porosity of the nanomaterial and the substrate itself, a sensitive glucose sensor is proposed by immobilizing glucose oxidase. The presented glucose sensor has shown linear response over a wide range of glucose concentrations from 0.005 mM to 15 mM with a sensitivity of 91.34 mV/decade and a fast response time of less than 10 s. The NiCo2O4 nanostructures-based glucose sensor has shown excellent reproducibility, repeatability and stability. The sensor showed negligible response to the normal concentrations of common interferents with glucose sensing, including uric acid, dopamine and ascorbic acid. All these favorable advantages of the fabricated glucose sensor suggest that it may have high potential for the determination of glucose in biological samples, food and other related areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24647124 PMCID: PMC4003998 DOI: 10.3390/s140305415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.(a) SEM image of bare Ni foam substrate (b–d) Typical SEM images at different magnifications of NiCo2O4 nanostructures grown via low temperature hydrothermal method.
Figure 2.The XRD spectrum of NiCo2O4 nanostructures and inset is showing XRD spectra of bare Ni foam substrate.
Figure 3.XPS spectrum of NiCo2O4 nanostructures, (a) wide scan spectrum, (b) O 1 s spectrum, (c) Co 2p spectrum, (d) Ni 2p spectrum.
Figure 4.The calibration curve of glucose biosensor based on NiCo2O4 nanostructures for linear concentration range of 0.005 mM to 15 mM.
Figure 5.The response time of glucose biosensor in 1 mM glucose concentration.
Figure 6.The reproducibility of glucose biosensor in 0.1 mM glucose concentration.
Figure 7.The repeatability curve of the proposed glucose biosensor for 3 consecutive experiments.
Comparison of the characteristics of the presented work and some other previously reported glucose biosensors.
| InN | 80 mV/decade | <2 s | 14 days | 1.0 × 10−5 – 1.0 × 10−2 M | - | [ |
| Multiwall carbon NTs | 12.1 μA/mM | - | 5 weeks | 1–500 μM | 1.3 ± 0.1 μM | [ |
| Polypyrrole | 90 mV/decade | 30 min | 10 days | 6.0 × 10−5 – 5.0 × 10−3 M | - | [ |
| Gold nano particles | 2.3 mA/M | <5 s | >2 weeks | 1.0 × 10−6 – 8.0 × 10−4 mol/L | 5.0 × 10−7 M | [ |
| Iodide | 65.2 ± 0.2 mV/glucose | 1–2 min | ∼1 month | 1.0 × 10−1 – 1.0 × 10−6 M | - | [ |
| Carbon NTs | 602.04 μAmM−1cm−1 | 30 s | - | 5.0 × 10−7 – 1.8 × 10−3 M | 1.0 × 10−7 M | [ |
| Silver nano particles | 135.904 μAmM−1 | >10 s | 10 days | 0.5–50 μM | 0.1 μM | [ |
| NiCo2O4 | 91.34 mV/decade | <10 sec | 3 weeks | 0.005–15 mM | 1.49× 10−3 mM | Present work |