Literature DB >> 24646693

Stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis using balloon mounted coronary stents: a single center experience.

Christopher R Durst1, Scott R Geraghty2, Andrew M Southerland3, Robert M Starke4, Karen Rembold5, Shaneela Malik6, Max Wintermark1, Kenneth C Liu4, R Webster Crowley4, John Gaughen1, Mary E Jensen1, Avery J Evans1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease is the cause of up to 10% of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Intracranial stenting with off-label balloon mounted coronary stents (BMCS) may be a viable alternative for patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis who fail best medical therapy.
DESIGN: Between December 2005 and June 2012, 42 symptomatic intracranial stenoses were treated with a BMCS after failing medical management. Procedural records, clinical outcomes, and imaging follow-up were reviewed. Outcome measurements included technical success rate, morbidity and mortality, long term stent patency, and clinical outcomes, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale.
RESULTS: The technical success rate was 98% (41 of 42 lesions). Morbidity within the first 30 days was 7.1% (three of 42 lesions). Overall morbidity, including both periprocedural and long term evaluation, was 9.5% (four of 42 lesions). There were no deaths. Follow-up imaging was available for 30 stents (71%) with an average follow-up time of 35.1 months. Restenosis (>50%) and retreatment were observed in 20% and 10% of cases, respectively. Clinical evaluation by a neurologist ≥ 30 days postprocedure was available in 40 of 42 cases (95%) with an average of 32.1 months. At presentation, 55% of patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2. At follow-up, 74% of patients were found to have an mRS score of ≤ 2.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BMCS may benefit patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis who experience stroke or transient ischemic attack in spite of best medical therapy. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; Intervention; Stenosis; Stent; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24646693     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

Review 1.  Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

Authors:  Arindam R Chatterjee; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Successful Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis Using a 24-mm Long Bare Metal Coronary Stent.

Authors:  Azeem A Rehman; Ryan C Turner; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; SoHyun Boo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  G Peng; Y Zhang; Z Miao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Advances in neurovascular treatments.

Authors:  Robert M Starke; Stephen J Monteith; Nohra Chalouhi; Dale Ding; Ricky Medel; David Hasan; Aaron S Dumont
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Usefulness of Self-Expandable Stent for Recanalization of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: Preliminary Experience with Enterprise Stent.

Authors:  Woo Sang Jung; Sam-Soo Kim; Kyung-Yul Lee; Sang Hyun Suh
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2022-02-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.