Literature DB >> 24646565

Risk prediction score in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training: experience from the English National Training Program.

Hugh Mackenzie1, Danilo Miskovic, Melody Ni, Wah-Siew Tan, Deborah S Keller, Choong-Leong Tang, Conor P Delaney, Mark G Coleman, George B Hanna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The overall aim was to develop and validate a risk prediction score for laparoscopic colorectal surgery training cases.
BACKGROUND: Published risk prediction scores are not transferable between hospitals because they are derived from a single institution's data and are not designed for use in training situations.
METHODS: Cases from the prospectively collected database of the National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, between July 2008 and July 2012, were analyzed. Independent risk factors for conversion were identified by the logistic regression. Converting the odds ratios into integers created a risk prediction score for conversion. The clinical impact of this score was investigated by comparing postoperative complications and the level of trainer input in high- and low-risk cases. To study whether adverse outcomes in predicted high-risk cases occur outside the National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, 2 external data sets were examined.
RESULTS: A total of 2341 cases carried out in 42 hospitals were analyzed. Significant risk factors for conversion were body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, male sex, prior abdominal surgery, and resection type. At a risk score of more than 6, complication rates increased, including mortality (2.9% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001), anastomotic leak (4.3% vs 1.4%, P = 0.002), and a higher level of trainer input (32.2% vs 19.9% of cases, P < 0.001). Analysis of 786 external cases showed that high-risk cases had higher conversion (18.8% vs 7.1%, P < 0.001), overall complication (36.4% vs 15.0%, P < 0.001), and leak rates (4.0% vs 1.3%, P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: A risk predication score to facilitate case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training was developed and validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24646565     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  Development and implementation of the Structured Training Trainer Assessment Report (STTAR) in the English National Training Programme for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Susannah M Wyles; Danilo Miskovic; Zhifang Ni; Ara W Darzi; Roland M Valori; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mentored Trainees have Similar Short-Term Outcomes to a Consultant Trainer Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection.

Authors:  Henry D De'Ath; Laurence Devoto; Chaitanya Mehta; James Bromilow; Tahseen Qureshi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of Functional Recovery is Crucial for Implementing ERAS: Reply.

Authors:  A Kummer; D Hahnloser; N Demartines; M Hübner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Laparoscopy may decrease morbidity and length of stay after elective colon cancer resection, especially in frail patients: results from an observational real-life study.

Authors:  Carlos Cerdán Santacruz; Matteo Frasson; Blas Flor-Lorente; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Marta Trallero Anoro; Mónica Millán Scheiding; Olga Maseda Díaz; Paula Dujovne Lindenbaum; Andrés Monzón Abad; Eduardo García-Granero Ximenez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Niraj Parikh; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on short-term outcomes and long-term overall survival after colorectal resection for cancer.

Authors:  Chintamani Godbole; Aneel Bhangu; Douglas M Bowley; Thejasvi Subramanian; Sivesh K Kamarajah; Sharad Karandikar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Laparoscopic Colorectal Training Gap in Colorectal and Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Beth-Ann Shanker; Mark Soliman; Paul Williamson; Andrea Ferrara
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Association between institutional procedural preference and in-hospital outcomes in laparoscopic surgeries; Insights from a retrospective cohort analysis of a nationwide surgical database in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroaki Miyata; Masaki Mori; Norihiro Kokudo; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Hiroyuki Konno; Go Wakabayashi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Toshiaki Watanabe; Minoru Ono; Hideki Hashimoto; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Hiraku Kumamaru; Shun Kohsaka; Tadashi Iwanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A preoperative scoring system to predict the risk of No.10 lymph node metastasis for advanced upper gastric cancer: a large case report based on a single-center study.

Authors:  Zhi-Liang Hong; Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.