OBJECTIVE: We investigate the mechanism through which N-cadherin disruption alters the effectiveness of regional chemotherapy for locally advanced melanoma. BACKGROUND: N-cadherin antagonism during regional chemotherapy has demonstrated variable treatment effects. METHODS: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) with melphalan (LPAM) or temozolomide (TMZ) was performed on rats bearing melanoma xenografts after systemic administration of the N-cadherin antagonist, ADH-1, or saline. Permeability studies were performed using Evans blue dye as the infusate, and interstitial fluid pressure was measured. Immunohistochemistry of LPAM-DNA adducts and damage was performed as surrogates for LPAM and TMZ delivery. Tumor signaling was studied by Western blotting and reverse-phase protein array analysis. RESULTS: Systemic ADH-1 was associated with increased growth and activation of the PI3K (phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase)-AKT pathway in A375 but not DM443 xenografts. ADH-1 in combination with LPAM ILI improved antitumor responses compared with LPAM alone in both cell lines. Combination of ADH-1 with TMZ ILI did not improve tumor response in A375 tumors. ADH-1 increased vascular permeability without effecting tumor interstitial fluid pressure, leading to increased delivery of LPAM but not TMZ. CONCLUSIONS: ADH-1 improved responses to regional LPAM but had variable effects on tumors regionally treated with TMZ. N-cadherin-targeting agents may lead to differential effects on the AKT signaling axis that can augment growth of some tumors. The vascular targeting actions of N-cadherin antagonism may not augment some regionally delivered alkylating agents, leading to a net increase in tumor size with this type of combination treatment strategy.
OBJECTIVE: We investigate the mechanism through which N-cadherin disruption alters the effectiveness of regional chemotherapy for locally advanced melanoma. BACKGROUND:N-cadherin antagonism during regional chemotherapy has demonstrated variable treatment effects. METHODS: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) with melphalan (LPAM) or temozolomide (TMZ) was performed on rats bearing melanoma xenografts after systemic administration of the N-cadherin antagonist, ADH-1, or saline. Permeability studies were performed using Evans blue dye as the infusate, and interstitial fluid pressure was measured. Immunohistochemistry of LPAM-DNA adducts and damage was performed as surrogates for LPAM and TMZ delivery. Tumor signaling was studied by Western blotting and reverse-phase protein array analysis. RESULTS: Systemic ADH-1 was associated with increased growth and activation of the PI3K (phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase)-AKT pathway in A375 but not DM443 xenografts. ADH-1 in combination with LPAM ILI improved antitumor responses compared with LPAM alone in both cell lines. Combination of ADH-1 with TMZ ILI did not improve tumor response in A375tumors. ADH-1 increased vascular permeability without effecting tumor interstitial fluid pressure, leading to increased delivery of LPAM but not TMZ. CONCLUSIONS:ADH-1 improved responses to regional LPAM but had variable effects on tumors regionally treated with TMZ. N-cadherin-targeting agents may lead to differential effects on the AKT signaling axis that can augment growth of some tumors. The vascular targeting actions of N-cadherin antagonism may not augment some regionally delivered alkylating agents, leading to a net increase in tumor size with this type of combination treatment strategy.
Authors: Christina K Augustine; Yasunori Yoshimoto; Mukur Gupta; Patricia A Zipfel; M Angelica Selim; Phillip Febbo; Ann Marie Pendergast; William P Peters; Douglas S Tyler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Elizabeth G Grubbs; Tomio Ueno; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Tsung-Yen Cheng; Scott K Pruitt; O Michael Colvin; Henry S Friedman; Douglas S Tyler Journal: Surgery Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: John M L Ebos; Christina R Lee; William Cruz-Munoz; Georg A Bjarnason; James G Christensen; Robert S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: A Perotti; C Sessa; A Mancuso; C Noberasco; S Cresta; A Locatelli; M L Carcangiu; K Passera; A Braghetti; D Scaramuzza; F Zanaboni; A Fasolo; G Capri; M Miani; W P Peters; L Gianni Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Shaofeng Yan; Britt M Holderness; Zhongze Li; Gregory D Seidel; Jiang Gui; Jan L Fisher; Marc S Ernstoff Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Krzysztof M Mrozik; Chee M Cheong; Duncan R Hewett; Jacqueline E Noll; Khatora S Opperman; Alaknanda Adwal; Darryl L Russell; Orest W Blaschuk; Kate Vandyke; Andrew C W Zannettino Journal: FASEB Bioadv Date: 2020-06-15
Authors: Deepali Pal; Helen Blair; Jessica Parker; Sean Hockney; Melanie Beckett; Mankaran Singh; Ricky Tirtakusuma; Ryan Nelson; Hesta McNeill; Sharon H Angel; Aaron Wilson; Salem Nizami; Sirintra Nakjang; Peixun Zhou; Claire Schwab; Paul Sinclair; Lisa J Russell; Jonathan Coxhead; Christina Halsey; James M Allan; Christine J Harrison; Anthony V Moorman; Olaf Heidenreich; Josef Vormoor Journal: Cell Rep Med Date: 2022-08-16
Authors: Krzysztof Marek Mrozik; Orest William Blaschuk; Chee Man Cheong; Andrew Christopher William Zannettino; Kate Vandyke Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Montamas Suntravat; Oscar Sanchez; Armando Reyes; Abcde Cirilo; Jack S Ocheltree; Jacob A Galan; Emelyn Salazar; Peter Davies; Elda E Sanchez Journal: Toxins (Basel) Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 4.546