Literature DB >> 24645822

The buck in the milkweed: evidence of male-male interference among pollinaria on pollinators.

Andrea A Cocucci1, Salvador Marino, Matías Baranzelli, Ana P Wiemer, Alicia Sérsic.   

Abstract

Direct physical confrontation among conspecifics for access to mates is a form of sexual selection well known among animals, but not thought to take place in plants. Consequently, no structures are known that can be considered as weapons that evolved under such confrontation. Pollinaria of milkweeds may physically compete for access to attachment points on the pollinators' body, and occasionally pollinaria may link onto pre-existing pollinaria on a pollinator resulting in concatenation. We hypothesized that concatenation may result in interference between proximal and distal pollinaria, and that features of nonconcatenating pollinaria might be attributed to prevention of concatenation. We tested this by analyzing pollen donation efficiency, experimental manipulation of the phenotype and the phylogenetic patterns of co-occurrence of traits. It is shown that concatenation was able to diminish the reproductive performance of proximal pollinaria, that horns on pollinaria prevented concatenation, and that horn acquisition was correlated with a loss of concatenation. The experimental removal of horns in species that did not concatenate caused reversion to concatenation. The present work could be the first evidence of male physical struggles and of the acquisition of weapons related to these struggles, that are analogous to those known in animals.
© 2014 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2014 New Phytologist Trust.

Keywords:  competitive rivalry; male struggle; milkweed; pollinarium; sexual selection; weapons

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24645822     DOI: 10.1111/nph.12766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  9 in total

Review 1.  Development and evolution of extreme synorganization in angiosperm flowers and diversity: a comparison of Apocynaceae and Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Peter K Endress
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Effect of expanded variation in anther position on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum.

Authors:  Yuval Sapir; Keith Karoly; Vanessa A Koelling; Heather F Sahli; Frances N Knapczyk; Jeffrey K Conner
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Using theories of sexual selection and sexual conflict to improve our understanding of plant ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Åsa Lankinen; Kristina Karlsson Green
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Slow stamen movement in a perennial herb decreases male-male and male-female interference.

Authors:  Lingyan Wang; Yu Bao; Hanxi Wang; Chunguang He; Ping Wang; Lianxi Sheng; Zhanhui Tang
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Sex-specific strategies of resource allocation in response to competition for light in a dioecious plant.

Authors:  Jeanne Tonnabel; Patrice David; John R Pannell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Do metrics of sexual selection conform to Bateman's principles in a wind-pollinated plant?

Authors:  Jeanne Tonnabel; Patrice David; John R Pannell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Rapid divergence in vegetative morphology of a wind-pollinated plant between populations at contrasting densities.

Authors:  Jeanne Tonnabel; Patrice David; John R Pannell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Differential selection on pollen and pistil traits in relation to pollen competition in the context of a sexual conflict over timing of stigma receptivity.

Authors:  Åsa Lankinen; Maria Strandh
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.276

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.