| Literature DB >> 24645793 |
Ryan Koenig, Jonathan R Dickman, Chounghun Kang, Tianou Zhang, Yi-Fang Chu, Li Li Ji1.
Abstract
During aging, chronic systemic inflammation increases in prevalence and antioxidant balance shifts in favor of oxidant generation. Avenanthramide (AVA) is a group of oat phenolics that have shown anti-inflammatory and antioxidant capability. The present study investigated whether dietary supplementation of avenanthramides (AVA) in oats would increase antioxidant protection and reduce inflammation after a bout of downhill walking (DW) in postmenopausal women. Women at age of 50-80 years (N = 16) were randomly divided into two groups in a double-blinded fashion, receiving two cookies made of oat flour providing 9.2 mg AVA or 0.4 mg AVA (control, C) each day for 8 weeks. Before and after the dietary regimen, each group of subjects walked downhill on a treadmill (-9% grade) for 4 bouts of 15 minutes at a speed of 4.0 km/h with 5 minutes rest between sessions. Blood samples were collected at rest, 24 h post-DW, and 48 h post-DW pre- and post-supplementation. Both DW sessions increased plasma creatine kinase activity (P < 0.05). Before supplementation, in vitro neutrophil respiratory burst (NRB) activity was increased at 24 h post-DW (P < 0.05) and C-reactive protein (CRP) was increased 48 h post-DW (P < 0.05). AVA supplementation decreased DW-induced NRB at 24 h (P < 0.05) and CRP level 48 h (P < 0.05). Plasma interleukin (IL)-1β concentration and mononuclear cell nuclear factor (NF) κB binding were suppressed at rest and during post-DW period in AVA but not C group (P < 0.05). Plasma total antioxidant capacity (P < 0.05) and erythrocyte superoxide dismutase activity were increased in AVA vs. C (P < 0.05), whereas glutathione redox status was elevated 48 h post-DW but not affected by AVA. Thus, chronic AVA supplementation decreased systemic and DW-induced inflammation and increased blood-borne antioxidant defense in postmenopausal women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24645793 PMCID: PMC3999982 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Characteristics of postmenopausal participants
| | Age (y) | Height (m) | Body Weight (kg) | BMI | Body Weight (kg) | BMI |
| Control | 60.125 ± 2.20 | 1.48 ± 0.025 | 57.50 ± 2.42 | 26.40 ± 1.59 | 57.65 ± 2.53 | 26.42 ± 1.61 |
| AVA | 59.000 ± 2.25 | 1.45 ± 0.051 | 60.45 ± 2.66 | 29.01 ± 1.27 | 59.91 ± 2.69 | 28.74 ± 1.39 |
Note: Data are mean ± SEM. AVA, avananthramide. BMI, body mass index defined by the ratio of body weight (kg) divided by height (meter)2.
Figure 1Plasma CK activity in postmenopausal women in response to downhill walking (DW). Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8). * P < 0.05, 24 h post-DW vs. Rest.
Figure 2Neutrophil respiratory burst activity in postmenopausal women in response to DW. Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8), normalized to Pre-Supplementation Rest value. * P < 0.05, 24 h vs. Rest. § P < 0.05, AVA vs. Control in 24 h post-DW.
Figure 3Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations in postmenopausal women in response to DW. Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8). * P < 0.05, 48 h post-DW vs. Rest. § P < 0.05, AVA vs. Control in 48 h post-DW.
Figure 4Plasma interleukin (IL)-1β concentrations in young women in response to DW. Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8). § P < 0.05, AVA vs. Control in Rest and 24 h post-DW.
Figure 5Mononuclear cell NFκB binding activity in postmenopausal women in response to DW. Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8), normalized to Pre-Supplementation Rest value. § P < 0.05, AVA vs. Control.
Figure 6Plasma total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in postmenopausal women. Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8). + P < 0.05, Post- vs. Pre-supplementation regardless of time or AVA treatment.
Erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activity and plasma glutathione status
| Pre-Supplementation | Rest | 408 ± 20.6 | 410 ± 19.9 | 440 ± 18.9 | 452 ± 16.2 | 5.90 ± 0.19 | 5.90 ± 0.10 | 1.10 ± 0.09 | 1.10 ± 0.13 | 5.36 ± 0.20 | 5.36 ± 0.19 |
| 24 h Post-DW | 393 ± 34.6 | 436 ± 10.0 | 399 ± 19.7 | 445 ± 19.3 | 6.57 ± 0.19 | 6.26 ± 0.12 | 1.15 ± 0.08 | 1.20 ± 0.10* | 5.71 ± 0.21 | 5.20 ± 0.04 | |
| 48 h Post-DW | 383 ± 15.3 | 403 ± 20.3 | 406 ± 14.1 | 436 ± 50.2 | 6.44 ± 0.21 | 7.05 ± 0.12 | 1.07 ± 0.10 | 1.14 ± 0.13 | 6.03 ± 0.22* | 6.18 ± 0.17* | |
| Post-Supplementation | Rest | 374 ± 38.7 | 419 ± 21.1 | 419 ± 14.1 | 319 ± 17.9¥ | 5.76 ± 0.17 | 6.46 ± 0.20 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 1.16 ± 0.12 | 5.41 ± 0.15 | 5.59 ± 0.13 |
| 24 h Post-DW | 353 ± 23.6 | 362 ± 60.1 | 376 ± 11.9 | 312 ± 24.6¥ | 6.00 ± 0.15 | 6.65 ± 0.18 | 1.19 ± 0.05* | 1.19 ± 0.13 | 5.03 ± 0.17 | 5.57 ± 0.10 | |
| 48 h Post-DW | 389 ± 17.5 | 449 ± 6.5§ | 397 ± 11.9 | 336 ± 61.9 | 6.27 ± 0.08 | 6.48 ± 0.15 | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 1.10 ± 0.06 | 6.16 ± 0.16* | 5.89 ± 0.17 | |
Note: Data are mean ± SEM (N = 8). SOD, superoxidae dismutase. Gpx, glutathione peroxidase. GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulfide. DW, downhill walking (see text for details). * P < 0.05, 24 or 48 h Post-DW vs. Rest. § P < 0.05, Post-supplementation vs. Presupplementation. ¥ 0.05 < P < 0.1, AVA vs. Control.