| Literature DB >> 24644426 |
Wei Liu1, Shu-Jun Wang2, Qi-De Lin1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between oxygen sensitivity of trophoblast and hypoxia in preeclamptic placenta by the study on the expressions of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase (PHD) and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) in placentas from normal pregnant women and patients with pre-eclampsia.Entities:
Keywords: Hypoxia-inducible factor; Preeclampsia; Trophoblast.; hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24644426 PMCID: PMC3957083 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.6375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Clinical Parameters Of Control And Preeclampsia.
| Control | Gestational hypertension | Preeclampsia group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case number | n=13 | n=11 | n=20 |
| Mean maternal age(yr) | 29.54+2.40 | 30.45+6.53 | 27.77+4.29 |
| G.A. at delivery (wk) | 39.21+0.60 | 39.71+1.40 | 37.40+2.70 |
| number of pregnancies | 2.08+1.38 | 1.55+0.52 | 1.73+0.94 |
| Parity | 1+0 | 1.18+0.40 | 1.09+0.29 |
| placental weight (g) | 690.77+132.94 | 657.73+93.28 | 598.45+163.97 |
| Fetal weight(g) | 3560.00+333.39 | 3776.36+301.86 | 3066.14+798.99 |
| Fetal Sex | Male: 6; Female: 7 | Male: 5; Female: 6 | Male: 11; Female: 9 |
| MAP(mmHg) | 86.62+0.65 | 109.27+2.90 | 123.63+15.22 |
| Proteinuria(mg/dl) | Negative | negative | 151.14+127.35 |
Control group is the late pregnant group. G.A.: Gestational Age. MAP: mean arterial pressure.
Figure 1The expression of PHDs mRNA in placenta of late pregnancy group. PHD-1 mRNA expression in placenta from late pregnancy detected by in situ hybridization. B. The specific stain of PHD -1 mRNA by in situ hybridization in extravillus trophoblast from late pregnancy group. C. PHD-2 mRNA expression in placenta from late pregnancy by in situ hybridization. D. PHD-3 mRNA expression in placenta from late pregnancy by in situ hybridization. E. Blank Control with non-specific probe.
Figure 2The expression of PHD-1, -2 and -3 mRNA in normal pregnancy. PHD-1, -2 and -3 mRNA expressions in early-, middle- and late-pregnancy groups were determined by real-time PCR analysis. All the mRNAs expression levels after rectified with that for GAPDH were normalized with that of PHD-1 in early pregnancy group. Abbreviation: EP, early pregnancy group; MP, middle pregnancy group; LP, late pregnancy group.
Figure 3The expression of PHD-1 and -2 and -3 mRNA in placenta from preeclampsia group and gestational hypertension group and control group. PHD-1, -2 and -3 mRNA expressions in control group, preeclampsia group and gestational hypertension group were determined by real-time PCR analysis (values are mean ± SEM, *p<0.05). All the mRNAs expression levels after rectified with that for GAPDH were normalized with that in control group. Abbreviation: PE, preeclampsia group; GH, gestational hypertension group.
The correlation analysis between PHD-1 mRNA and HIF-2α protein in placenta from PE group and clinical manifestation.
| Clinical manifestation | PHD-1 | HIF-2α | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | P | Value | P | |
| 1MAP(mmHg) | -0.060 | 0.801 | -0.107 | 0.741 |
| UPC(mg/dl) | 0.297 | 0.203 | -0.263 | 0.408 |
| WON(g) | -0.001 | 0.996 | -0.425 | 0.169 |
| PW(g) | 0.457* | 0.043 | -0.143 | 0.658 |
| OT (day) | -0.075 | 0.752 | -0.730** | 0.007 |
| AFT(limpidity, degree 1~3) | 0.367 | 0.111 | 0.336 | 0.285 |
| NAS(1~10) | 0.057 | 0.812 | -0.478 | 0.116 |
| FRG(Yes or No) | -0.097 | 0.683 | 0.358 | 0.253 |
| premature(Yes or No) | -0.228 | 0.334 | 0.591* | 0.043 |
| ES(Yes or No) | -0.041 | 0.863 | 0.389 | 0.212 |
The correlation analysis was performed with SPSS11.0 software. Abbreviation: MAP, mean arterial pressure; UPC, urinary protein concentration; WON, Weight of Newborns; PW, placenta weights; OT, Onset time; AFT, amniotic fluid turbidity; NAS, Neonatal apgar score; FRG, Fetal Growth Restriction; ES, Eye spasms. **P<0.01, *P<0.05.
Figure 4The expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in preeclampsia placenta group. A. Detection of HIF-1α in preeclampsia placenta by Immunohistochemistry. B. Detection of HIF-2α in preeclampsia placenta by Immunohistochemistry. C. Control with Rabbit IgG.
Figure 5The comparison of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in preeclampsia placenta group and control group. A. The expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in preeclampsia placenta group and control group with Actin as control by western blot. B. Quantification of the expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in preeclampsia placenta group and control group.