PURPOSE: The rd12 mouse was reported as a recessively inherited Rpe65 mutation. We asked if the rd12 mutation resides in Rpe65 and how the mutation manifests itself. METHODS: A complementation test was performed by mating Rpe65(KO) (KO/KO) and rd12 mice together to determine if the rd12 mutation is in the Rpe65 gene. Visual function of wild-type (+/+), KO/+, rd12/+, KO/KO, rd12/rd12, and KO/rd12 mice was measured by optokinetic tracking (OKT) and ERG. Morphology was assessed by retinal cross section. qRT-PCR quantified Rpe65 mRNA levels. Immunoblotting measured the size and level of RPE65 protein. Rpe65 mRNA localization was visualized with RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Fractions of Rpe65 mRNA-bound proteins were separated by linear sucrose gradient fractionation. RESULTS: The KO and rd12 alleles did not complement. The rd12 allele induced a negative semidominant effect on visual function; OKT responses became undetectable 120 days earlier in rd12/rd12 mice compared with KO/KO mice. rd12/+ mice lost approximately 21% visual acuity by P210. rd12/rd12 mice had fewer cone photoreceptor nuclei than KO/KO mice at P60. rd12/rd12 mice expressed 71% +/+ levels of Rpe65 mRNA, but protein was undetectable. Mutant mRNA was appropriately spliced, exported to the cytoplasm, trafficked, and contained no other coding mutation aside from the known nonsense mutation. Mutant mRNA was enriched on ribosome-free messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs), whereas wild-type mRNA was enriched on actively translating polyribosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The rd12 lesion is in Rpe65. The rd12 mutant phenotype inherits in a semidominant manner. The effects of the mutant mRNA on visual function may result from inefficient binding to ribosomes for translation.
PURPOSE: The rd12mouse was reported as a recessively inherited Rpe65 mutation. We asked if the rd12 mutation resides in Rpe65 and how the mutation manifests itself. METHODS: A complementation test was performed by mating Rpe65(KO) (KO/KO) and rd12mice together to determine if the rd12 mutation is in the Rpe65 gene. Visual function of wild-type (+/+), KO/+, rd12/+, KO/KO, rd12/rd12, and KO/rd12mice was measured by optokinetic tracking (OKT) and ERG. Morphology was assessed by retinal cross section. qRT-PCR quantified Rpe65 mRNA levels. Immunoblotting measured the size and level of RPE65 protein. Rpe65 mRNA localization was visualized with RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Fractions of Rpe65 mRNA-bound proteins were separated by linear sucrose gradient fractionation. RESULTS: The KO and rd12 alleles did not complement. The rd12 allele induced a negative semidominant effect on visual function; OKT responses became undetectable 120 days earlier in rd12/rd12mice compared with KO/KO mice. rd12/+ mice lost approximately 21% visual acuity by P210. rd12/rd12mice had fewer cone photoreceptor nuclei than KO/KO mice at P60. rd12/rd12mice expressed 71% +/+ levels of Rpe65 mRNA, but protein was undetectable. Mutant mRNA was appropriately spliced, exported to the cytoplasm, trafficked, and contained no other coding mutation aside from the known nonsense mutation. Mutant mRNA was enriched on ribosome-free messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs), whereas wild-type mRNA was enriched on actively translating polyribosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The rd12 lesion is in Rpe65. The rd12 mutant phenotype inherits in a semidominant manner. The effects of the mutant mRNA on visual function may result from inefficient binding to ribosomes for translation.
Authors: Ji-Jing Pang; Bo Chang; Norman L Hawes; Ronald E Hurd; Muriel T Davisson; Jie Li; Syed M Noorwez; Ritu Malhotra; J Hugh McDowell; Shalesh Kaushal; William W Hauswirth; Steven Nusinowitz; Debra A Thompson; John R Heckenlively Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: B Chang; N L Hawes; M T Pardue; A M German; R E Hurd; M T Davisson; S Nusinowitz; K Rengarajan; A P Boyd; S S Sidney; M J Phillips; R E Stewart; R Chaudhury; J M Nickerson; J R Heckenlively; J H Boatright Journal: Vision Res Date: 2007-01-30 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: H Morimura; G A Fishman; S A Grover; A B Fulton; E L Berson; T P Dryja Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-03-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Salil A Lachke; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Stephen C Kneeland; Takbum Ohn; Anton Aboukhalil; Gareth R Howell; Irfan Saadi; Resy Cavallesco; Yingzi Yue; Anne C-H Tsai; K Saidas Nair; Mihai I Cosma; Richard S Smith; Emily Hodges; Suad M Alfadhli; Amal Al-Hajeri; Hanan E Shamseldin; Abdulmutalib Behbehani; Gregory J Hannon; Martha L Bulyk; Arlene V Drack; Paul J Anderson; Simon W M John; Richard L Maas Journal: Science Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: R A Pearson; A C Barber; M Rizzi; C Hippert; T Xue; E L West; Y Duran; A J Smith; J Z Chuang; S A Azam; U F O Luhmann; A Benucci; C H Sung; J W Bainbridge; M Carandini; K-W Yau; J C Sowden; R R Ali Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Francesca Simonelli; Albert M Maguire; Francesco Testa; Eric A Pierce; Federico Mingozzi; Jeannette L Bennicelli; Settimio Rossi; Kathleen Marshall; Sandro Banfi; Enrico M Surace; Junwei Sun; T Michael Redmond; Xiaosong Zhu; Kenneth S Shindler; Gui-Shuang Ying; Carmela Ziviello; Carmela Acerra; J Fraser Wright; Jennifer Wellman McDonnell; Katherine A High; Jean Bennett; Alberto Auricchio Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Yan Li; Rachel Furhang; Amanda Ray; Todd Duncan; Joseph Soucy; Rashid Mahdi; Vijender Chaitankar; Linn Gieser; Eugenia Poliakov; Haohua Qian; Pinghu Liu; Lijin Dong; Igor B Rogozin; T Michael Redmond Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Giulio Poli; Ivana Barravecchia; Gian Carlo Demontis; Andrea Sodi; Alessandro Saba; Stanislao Rizzo; Marco Macchia; Tiziano Tuccinardi Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem Date: 2022-12 Impact factor: 5.756
Authors: Janise D Deming; Joseph S Pak; Bruce M Brown; Moon K Kim; Moe H Aung; Yun Sung Eom; Jung-A Shin; Eun-Jin Lee; Machelle T Pardue; Cheryl Mae Craft Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Songhua Li; Tadahide Izumi; Jane Hu; Heather H Jin; Ahmed-Abdul A Siddiqui; Samuel G Jacobson; Dean Bok; Minghao Jin Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Shanu Markand; Natecia L Baskin; Ranjay Chakraborty; Erica Landis; Sara A Wetzstein; Kevin J Donaldson; Priyanka Priyadarshani; Shannon E Alderson; Curran S Sidhu; Jeffrey H Boatright; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue; John M Nickerson Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Nathaniel F Henneman; Stephanie L Foster; Micah A Chrenek; Jana T Sellers; Charles B Wright; Robin H Schmidt; John M Nickerson; Jeffrey H Boatright Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gayle B Collin; Navdeep Gogna; Bo Chang; Nattaya Damkham; Jai Pinkney; Lillian F Hyde; Lisa Stone; Jürgen K Naggert; Patsy M Nishina; Mark P Krebs Journal: Cells Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 7.666