RATIONALE: Both β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) and Gq-coupled receptor (GqR) agonist-driven signaling play key roles in the events, leading up to and during cardiac dysfunction. How these stimuli interact at the level of protein kinase D (PKD), a nodal point in cardiac hypertrophic signaling, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of PKD activation in response to β-AR signaling alone and on coactivation with GqR-agonists. This will test our hypothesis that compartmentalized PKD signaling reconciles disparate findings of PKA facilitation and inhibition of PKD activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report on the spatial and temporal profiles of PKD activation using green fluorescent protein-tagged PKD (wildtype or mutant S427E) and targeted fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based biosensors (D-kinase activity reporters) in adult cardiomyocytes. We find that β-AR/PKA signaling drives local nuclear activation of PKD, without preceding sarcolemmal translocation. We also discover pronounced interference of β-AR/cAMP/PKA signaling on GqR-induced translocation and activation of PKD throughout the cardiomyocyte. We attribute these effects to direct, PKA-dependent phosphorylation of PKD-S427. We also show that phosphomimetic substitution of S427 likewise impedes GqR-induced PKD translocation and activation. In neonatal myocytes, S427E inhibits GqR-evoked cell growth and expression of hypertrophic markers. Finally, we show altered S427 phosphorylation in transverse aortic constriction-induced hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: β-AR signaling triggers local nuclear signaling and inhibits GqR-mediated PKD activation by preventing its intracellular translocation. PKA-dependent phosphorylation of PKD-S427 fine-tunes the PKD responsiveness to GqR-agonists, serving as a key integration point for β-adrenergic and Gq-coupled stimuli.
RATIONALE: Both β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) and Gq-coupled receptor (GqR) agonist-driven signaling play key roles in the events, leading up to and during cardiac dysfunction. How these stimuli interact at the level of protein kinase D (PKD), a nodal point in cardiac hypertrophic signaling, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of PKD activation in response to β-AR signaling alone and on coactivation with GqR-agonists. This will test our hypothesis that compartmentalized PKD signaling reconciles disparate findings of PKA facilitation and inhibition of PKD activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report on the spatial and temporal profiles of PKD activation using green fluorescent protein-tagged PKD (wildtype or mutant S427E) and targeted fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based biosensors (D-kinase activity reporters) in adult cardiomyocytes. We find that β-AR/PKA signaling drives local nuclear activation of PKD, without preceding sarcolemmal translocation. We also discover pronounced interference of β-AR/cAMP/PKA signaling on GqR-induced translocation and activation of PKD throughout the cardiomyocyte. We attribute these effects to direct, PKA-dependent phosphorylation of PKD-S427. We also show that phosphomimetic substitution of S427 likewise impedes GqR-induced PKD translocation and activation. In neonatal myocytes, S427E inhibits GqR-evoked cell growth and expression of hypertrophic markers. Finally, we show altered S427 phosphorylation in transverse aortic constriction-induced hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: β-AR signaling triggers local nuclear signaling and inhibits GqR-mediated PKD activation by preventing its intracellular translocation. PKA-dependent phosphorylation of PKD-S427 fine-tunes the PKD responsiveness to GqR-agonists, serving as a key integration point for β-adrenergic and Gq-coupled stimuli.
Entities:
Keywords:
GTP-binding proteins; cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinases; myocytes, cardiac; protein kinase D; receptors, adrenergic
Authors: Graeme K Carnegie; Joseph Soughayer; F Donelson Smith; Benjamin S Pedroja; Fang Zhang; Dario Diviani; Michael R Bristow; Maya T Kunkel; Alexandra C Newton; Lorene K Langeberg; John D Scott Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Mariah H Goodall; Robert D Wardlow; Rebecca R Goldblum; Andrew Ziman; W Jonathan Lederer; William Randall; Terry B Rogers Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: C Blake Nichols; Charles F Rossow; Manuel F Navedo; Ruth E Westenbroek; William A Catterall; Luis F Santana; G Stanley McKnight Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Jens Fielitz; Mi-Sung Kim; John M Shelton; Xiaoxia Qi; Joseph A Hill; James A Richardson; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nazira Ozgen; Maria Obreztchikova; Jianfen Guo; Hasnae Elouardighi; Gerald W Dorn; Brenda A Wilson; Susan F Steinberg Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Bence Hegyi; Julie Bossuyt; Kenneth S Ginsburg; Lynette M Mendoza; Linda Talken; William T Ferrier; Steven M Pogwizd; Leighton T Izu; Ye Chen-Izu; Donald M Bers Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-02
Authors: Melissa Herwig; Detmar Kolijn; Mária Lódi; Soraya Hölper; Árpád Kovács; Zoltán Papp; Kornelia Jaquet; Peter Haldenwang; Cris Dos Remedios; Peter H Reusch; Andreas Mügge; Marcus Krüger; Jens Fielitz; Wolfgang A Linke; Nazha Hamdani Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.566