Literature DB >> 24643325

Randomised controlled trials of videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy on intensive care are needed.

F E Kelly1, T M Cook.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24643325     DOI： 10.1007/s00134-014-3262-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN： 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Videolaryngoscopy: towards a new standard method for tracheal intubation in the ICU?

Authors:  Anders Larsson; Gilles Dhonneur
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before-after comparative study.

Authors:  Audrey De Jong; Noémie Clavieras; Matthieu Conseil; Yannael Coisel; Pierre-Henri Moury; Yvan Pouzeratte; Moussa Cisse; Fouad Belafia; Boris Jung; Gérald Chanques; Nicolas Molinari; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments.

Authors:  T M Cook; N Woodall; J Harper; J Benger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Videolaryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy.

Authors:  A van Zundert; B Pieters; V Doerges; S Gatt
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.166
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Inpatient Emergency Intubation in Adults.

Authors:  Tanja Rombey; Mark Schieren; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.