Literature DB >> 24643324

Factors influencing quantitative liquid (scanning) transmission electron microscopy.

P Abellan1, T J Woehl, L R Parent, N D Browning, J E Evans, I Arslan.   

Abstract

One of the experimental challenges in the study of nanomaterials in liquids in the (scanning) transmission electron microscope ((S)TEM) is gaining quantitative information. A successful experiment in the fluid stage will depend upon the ability to plan for sensitive factors such as the electron dose applied, imaging mode, acceleration voltage, beam-induced solution chemistry changes, and the specifics of solution reactivity. In this paper, we make use of a visual approach to show the extent of damage of different instrumental and experimental factors in liquid samples imaged in the (S)TEM. Previous results as well as new insights are presented to create an overview of beam-sample interactions identified for changing imaging and experimental conditions. This work establishes procedures to understand the effect of the electron beam on a solution, provides information to allow for a deliberate choice of the optimal experimental conditions to enable quantification, and identifies the experimental factors that require further analysis for achieving fully quantitative results in the liquid (S)TEM.

Year:  2014        PMID: 24643324     DOI: 10.1039/c3cc48479c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)        ISSN: 1359-7345            Impact factor:   6.222


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of complex, beam-sensitive materials by transmission electron microscopy and associated techniques.

Authors:  Martha Ilett; Mark S'ari; Helen Freeman; Zabeada Aslam; Natalia Koniuch; Maryam Afzali; James Cattle; Robert Hooley; Teresa Roncal-Herrero; Sean M Collins; Nicole Hondow; Andy Brown; Rik Brydson
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Formation of Au Nanoparticles in Liquid Cell Transmission Electron Microscopy: From a Systematic Study to Engineered Nanostructures.

Authors:  Yucheng Zhang; Debora Keller; Marta D Rossell; Rolf Erni
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 9.811

3.  Nanometer Resolution Elemental Mapping in Graphene-Based TEM Liquid Cells.

Authors:  Daniel J Kelly; Mingwei Zhou; Nick Clark; Matthew J Hamer; Edward A Lewis; Alexander M Rakowski; Sarah J Haigh; Roman V Gorbachev
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Studying Dynamic Processes of Nano-sized Objects in Liquid using Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Justus Hermannsdörfer; Niels de Jonge
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Importance of interlayer H bonding structure to the stability of layered minerals.

Authors:  Michele Conroy; Jennifer A Soltis; Rick S Wittman; Frances N Smith; Sayandev Chatterjee; Xin Zhang; Eugene S Ilton; Edgar C Buck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects Associated with Nanostructure Fabrication Using In Situ Liquid Cell TEM Technology.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Lihui Zhou; Ping Wang; Hongliang Cao; Xiaoli Miao; Feifei Wei; Xia Chen
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2015-07-28

7.  Direct Observation of Early Stages of Growth of Multilayered DNA-Templated Au-Pd-Au Core-Shell Nanoparticles in Liquid Phase.

Authors:  Nabraj Bhattarai; Tanya Prozorov
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26

8.  Self-assembling peptides imaged by correlated liquid cell transmission electron microscopy and MALDI-imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mollie A Touve; Andrea S Carlini; Nathan C Gianneschi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The role of electron irradiation history in liquid cell transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Trevor H Moser; Hardeep Mehta; Chiwoo Park; Ryan T Kelly; Tolou Shokuhfar; James E Evans
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.