Literature DB >> 24643256

Active Learning Strategies for Phenotypic Profiling of High-Content Screens.

Kevin Smith1, Peter Horvath2.   

Abstract

High-content screening is a powerful method to discover new drugs and carry out basic biological research. Increasingly, high-content screens have come to rely on supervised machine learning (SML) to perform automatic phenotypic classification as an essential step of the analysis. However, this comes at a cost, namely, the labeled examples required to train the predictive model. Classification performance increases with the number of labeled examples, and because labeling examples demands time from an expert, the training process represents a significant time investment. Active learning strategies attempt to overcome this bottleneck by presenting the most relevant examples to the annotator, thereby achieving high accuracy while minimizing the cost of obtaining labeled data. In this article, we investigate the impact of active learning on single-cell-based phenotype recognition, using data from three large-scale RNA interference high-content screens representing diverse phenotypic profiling problems. We consider several combinations of active learning strategies and popular SML methods. Our results show that active learning significantly reduces the time cost and can be used to reveal the same phenotypic targets identified using SML. We also identify combinations of active learning strategies and SML methods which perform better than others on the phenotypic profiling problems we studied.
© 2014 Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening.

Keywords:  High-content screening; active learning; machine learning; multiparametric analysis; phenotypic discovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24643256     DOI: 10.1177/1087057114527313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  8 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning applications in cell image analysis.

Authors:  Andrey Kan
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.126

2.  Development of the Theta Comparative Cell Scoring Method to Quantify Diverse Phenotypic Responses Between Distinct Cell Types.

Authors:  Scott J Warchal; John C Dawson; Neil O Carragher
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.738

3.  Regression plane concept for analysing continuous cellular processes with machine learning.

Authors:  Abel Szkalisity; Filippo Piccinini; Attila Beleon; Tamas Balassa; Istvan Gergely Varga; Ede Migh; Csaba Molnar; Lassi Paavolainen; Sanna Timonen; Indranil Banerjee; Elina Ikonen; Yohei Yamauchi; Istvan Ando; Jaakko Peltonen; Vilja Pietiäinen; Viktor Honti; Peter Horvath
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  FindFoci: a focus detection algorithm with automated parameter training that closely matches human assignments, reduces human inconsistencies and increases speed of analysis.

Authors:  Alex D Herbert; Antony M Carr; Eva Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Environmental properties of cells improve machine learning-based phenotype recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Timea Toth; Tamas Balassa; Norbert Bara; Ferenc Kovacs; Andras Kriston; Csaba Molnar; Lajos Haracska; Farkas Sukosd; Peter Horvath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Accelerating glioblastoma drug discovery: Convergence of patient-derived models, genome editing and phenotypic screening.

Authors:  Eoghan O'Duibhir; Neil O Carragher; Steven M Pollard
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.314

7.  Deep Visual Proteomics defines single-cell identity and heterogeneity.

Authors:  Andreas Mund; Fabian Coscia; András Kriston; Réka Hollandi; Ferenc Kovács; Andreas-David Brunner; Ede Migh; Lisa Schweizer; Alberto Santos; Michael Bzorek; Soraya Naimy; Lise Mette Rahbek-Gjerdrum; Beatrice Dyring-Andersen; Jutta Bulkescher; Claudia Lukas; Mark Adam Eckert; Ernst Lengyel; Christian Gnann; Emma Lundberg; Peter Horvath; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 68.164

8.  Unleashing high content screening in hit detection - Benchmarking AI workflows including novelty detection.

Authors:  Erwin Kupczyk; Kenji Schorpp; Kamyar Hadian; Sean Lin; Dimitrios Tziotis; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin; Constanze Mueller
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.155

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.