Literature DB >> 24643029

Outcomes of cochlear reimplantation in adults.

Simran Mahtani1, Fergal Glynn, Deborah Jane Mawman, Martin Paul O'Driscoll, Kevin Green, Iain Bruce, Simon Richard Mackenzie Freeman, Simon Kingsley Wickham Lloyd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the indications for, and auditory outcomes following, cochlear reimplantation in adults and investigate factors influencing outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Cochlear implant program in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty adults (32 ears) who have undergone cochlear reimplantation in the ipsilateral ear. INTERVENTION(S): Explantation and reimplantation of cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Speech discrimination as measured using Bamford-Kowal Bench sentence testing in quiet (BKBq) and noisy (BKBn) environments.
RESULTS: Best BKBq improved from 58.5% to 71.4% (p = 0.0242), and BKBn improved from 60.9% to 67.2% (p = 0.826) after reimplantation. Device failure was the most common indication for reimplantation. There was no significant difference in failure rate or outcome between implant manufacturers. The mean time to reimplantation was 4.7 years, and this was not related to auditory outcome. Otosclerosis and Ménière's disease may predispose to a worse auditory outcome after reimplantation.
CONCLUSION: Cochlear reimplantation does not have a detrimental effect on auditory outcomes and in some cases results in improved speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24643029     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  3 in total

1.  HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan R Lindquist; Nathan D Cass; Ankita Patro; Elizabeth L Perkins; René H Gifford; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Speech Recognition Outcomes After Cochlear Reimplantation Surgery.

Authors:  Mariana Reis; Isabelle Boisvert; Valerie Looi; Melville da Cruz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Electrode Afterload: A Valuable Technique in a Case of Short Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  C Riemann; S Scholz; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.