Literature DB >> 24642965

RAD50 targeting impairs DNA damage response and sensitizes human breast cancer cells to cisplatin therapy.

Ali Flores-Pérez1, Lourdes E Rafaelli1, Nayeli Ramírez-Torres1, Elena Aréchaga-Ocampo2, Sara Frías3, Silvia Sánchez4, Laurence A Marchat5, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda6, Valeria Quintanar-Jurado6, Sergio Rodríguez-Cuevas7, Verónica Bautista-Piña7, Angeles Carlos-Reyes8, César López-Camarillo1.   

Abstract

In tumor cells the effectiveness of anti-neoplastic agents that cause cell death by induction of DNA damage is influenced by DNA repair activity. RAD50 protein plays key roles in DNA double strand breaks repair (DSBs), which is crucial to safeguard genome integrity and sustain tumor suppression. However, its role as a potential therapeutic target has not been addressed in breast cancer. Our aim in the present study was to analyze the expression of RAD50 protein in breast tumors, and evaluate the effects of RAD50-targeted inhibition on the cytotoxicity exerted by cisplatin and anthracycline and taxane-based therapies in breast cancer cells. Immunohistochemistry assays on tissue microarrays indicate that the strong staining intensity of RAD50 was reduced in 14% of breast carcinomas in comparison with normal tissues. Remarkably, RAD50 silencing by RNA interference significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of cisplatin. Combinations of cisplatin with doxorubicin and paclitaxel drugs induced synergistic effects in early cell death of RAD50-deficient MCF-7, SKBR3, and T47D breast cancer cells. Furthermore, we found an increase in the number of DSBs, and delayed phosphorylation of histone H2AX after cisplatin treatment in RAD50-silenced cells. These cellular events were associated to a dramatical increase in the frequency of chromosomal aberrations and a decrease of cell number in metaphase. In conclusion, our data showed that RAD50 abrogation impairs DNA damage response and sensitizes breast cancer cells to cisplatin-combined therapies. We propose that the development and use of inhibitors to manipulate RAD50 levels might represent a promising strategy to sensitize breast cancer cells to DNA damaging agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; RAD50 targeting; breast cancer; chemosensitization; chromosomal aberrations; cisplatin; doxorubicin; histone H2AX; paclitaxel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24642965      PMCID: PMC4049793          DOI: 10.4161/cbt.28551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  32 in total

1.  Mutation screening of Mre11 complex genes: indication of RAD50 involvement in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  K Heikkinen; S-M Karppinen; Y Soini; M Mäkinen; R Winqvist
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  DNA repair.

Authors:  Oliver Fleck; Olaf Nielsen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Editorial: cancer chemoresistance and DNA repair.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Rad50 depletion impacts upon ATR-dependent DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Hui Zhong; Alyson Bryson; Mark Eckersdorff; David O Ferguson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Leandros-Vassilios F Vassiliou; Panagiotis Karakaidos; Panayotis Zacharatos; Athanassios Kotsinas; Triantafillos Liloglou; Monica Venere; Richard A Ditullio; Nikolaos G Kastrinakis; Brynn Levy; Dimitris Kletsas; Akihiro Yoneta; Meenhard Herlyn; Christos Kittas; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Chemotherapy with cis-platin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M Colozza; S Gori; A M Mosconi; V Belsanti; C Basurto; R Rossetti; F Di Costanzo; F Buzzi; M Bacchi; S Davis
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Altered expression of DNA double-strand break detection and repair proteins in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  S Angèle; I Treilleux; A Brémond; P Tanière; J Hall
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Disruption of p53 function sensitizes breast cancer MCF-7 cells to cisplatin and pentoxifylline.

Authors:  S Fan; M L Smith; D J Rivet; D Duba; Q Zhan; K W Kohn; A J Fornace; P M O'Connor
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group.

Authors:  F Icli; H Akbulut; A Uner; B Yalcin; E Baltali; M Altinbas; S Coşkun; S Komurcu; M Erkisi; A Demirkazik; F C Senler; O Sencan; A Büyükcelik; C Boruban; H Onur; N Zengin; S D Sak
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Monitoring the effects of doxorubicin on 3D-spheroid tumor cells in real-time.

Authors:  NamHuk Baek; Ok Won Seo; MinSung Kim; John Hulme; Seong Soo A An
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Aberrant DNA Double-strand Break Repair Threads in Breast Carcinoma: Orchestrating Genomic Insult Survival.

Authors:  Azad Kumar; Shruti Purohit; Nilesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-12-30

3.  ER-α36 mediates cisplatin resistance in breast cancer cells through EGFR/HER-2/ERK signaling pathway.

Authors:  Linlin Zhu; Jiao Zou; Yuanyin Zhao; Xiaomei Jiang; Yang Wang; Xiangwei Wang; Bin Chen
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-25

Review 4.  MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: implications for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lei Bian; Yiling Meng; Meichao Zhang; Dong Li
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  ASH2L drives proliferation and sensitivity to bleomycin and other genotoxins in Hodgkin's lymphoma and testicular cancer cells.

Authors:  Daniel Constantin; Christian Widmann
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  Identification of a genetic signature enriching for response to ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma in the DAWN phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; Brendan Hodkinson; Stephen J Schuster; Nathan H Fowler; Judith Trotman; Georg Hess; Bruce D Cheson; Michael Schaffer; Steven Sun; Sanjay Deshpande; Jessica Vermeulen; Gilles Salles; Ajay K Gopal
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  RAD50 deficiency is a predictor of platinum sensitivity in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Adel Alblihy; Muslim L Alabdullah; Michael S Toss; Mashael Algethami; Nigel P Mongan; Emad A Rakha; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Mol Biomed       Date:  2020-12-30

Review 8.  Impact of DNA damage response defects in cancer cells on response to immunotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Czajkowski; Radosław Szmyd; Harriet E Gee
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 1.667

9.  Real-time monitoring of cisplatin cytotoxicity on three-dimensional spheroid tumor cells.

Authors:  NamHuk Baek; Ok Won Seo; Jaehwa Lee; John Hulme; Seong Soo A An
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Lentivirus-mediated Knockdown of HDAC1 Uncovers Its Role in Esophageal Cancer Metastasis and Chemosensitivity.

Authors:  Min Song; Gang He; Yan Wang; Xueli Pang; Bo Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.207

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.