Summer S Hawkins1, Caitlin Dacey2, Susan Gennaro2, Tayra Keshinover3, Susan Gross4, Anne Gibeau3, Amanda Lulloff2, Kenneth M Aldous5. 1. Boston College, Graduate School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA; summer.hawkins@bc.edu. 2. Boston College, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA; 3. Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY; 4. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; 5. New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy has detrimental effects on fetal health, little is known about levels of SHS in nonsmoking pregnant women. We examined disparities in SHS exposure among nonsmoking, ethnic minority pregnant women in New York City. METHODS: We used self-reported smoking and serum cotinine collected from 244 pregnant women from the Bronx who self-identified as African American, Caribbean American, or Black Hispanic to examine smoking prevalence (>3 ng/ml) and, in an adjusted logistic regression model, risk factors for SHS (≥ 0.05 ng/ml and ≤ 3 ng/ml). RESULTS: Although only 4.1% of women self-reported they were smokers, 10.7% had serum cotinine levels indicating they were smokers. Among the 218 nonsmokers, 46.8% had serum cotinine levels indicating SHS exposure. Women at highest risk included those with less than a high school degree (66.7%) and those who were U.S.-born Black Hispanic (63.2%) or African American (63.0%). Women with more than 12 years of education were less likely to have detectable SHS exposure than women with fewer than 12 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.91). Compared with African American U.S.-born women, those who were African American foreign-born or Caribbean American and either U.S.-born or foreign-born were less likely to have detectable SHS exposure (all p ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of nonsmoking pregnant women in New York City had elevated cotinine levels despite living in a city with comprehensive tobacco control policies. Health professionals need to assess sources of SHS exposure during pregnancy and promote smoke-free environments to improve maternal and fetal health.
INTRODUCTION: Although secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy has detrimental effects on fetal health, little is known about levels of SHS in nonsmoking pregnant women. We examined disparities in SHS exposure among nonsmoking, ethnic minority pregnant women in New York City. METHODS: We used self-reported smoking and serum cotinine collected from 244 pregnant women from the Bronx who self-identified as African American, Caribbean American, or Black Hispanic to examine smoking prevalence (>3 ng/ml) and, in an adjusted logistic regression model, risk factors for SHS (≥ 0.05 ng/ml and ≤ 3 ng/ml). RESULTS: Although only 4.1% of women self-reported they were smokers, 10.7% had serum cotinine levels indicating they were smokers. Among the 218 nonsmokers, 46.8% had serum cotinine levels indicating SHS exposure. Women at highest risk included those with less than a high school degree (66.7%) and those who were U.S.-born Black Hispanic (63.2%) or African American (63.0%). Women with more than 12 years of education were less likely to have detectable SHS exposure than women with fewer than 12 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI = 0.17, 0.91). Compared with African American U.S.-born women, those who were African American foreign-born or Caribbean American and either U.S.-born or foreign-born were less likely to have detectable SHS exposure (all p ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of nonsmoking pregnant women in New York City had elevated cotinine levels despite living in a city with comprehensive tobacco control policies. Health professionals need to assess sources of SHS exposure during pregnancy and promote smoke-free environments to improve maternal and fetal health.
Authors: Patricia M Dietz; David Homa; Lucinda J England; Kim Burley; Van T Tong; Shanta R Dube; John T Bernert Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; John T Bernert; Ralph S Caraballo; David B Holiday; Jiantong Wang Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: James L Pirkle; John T Bernert; Samuel P Caudill; Connie S Sosnoff; Terry F Pechacek Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Payam Dadvand; James Grellier; David Martinez; Martine Vrijheid Journal: Environ Health Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Hudson P Santos; Arjun Bhattacharya; Elizabeth M Martin; Kezia Addo; Matt Psioda; Lisa Smeester; Robert M Joseph; Stephen R Hooper; Jean A Frazier; Karl C Kuban; T Michael O'Shea; Rebecca C Fry Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Zahira Quiñones; Dongmei Li; Scott McIntosh; Esteban Avendaño; José Javier Sánchez; Carmen DiMare-Hering; Daniel Flores-Golfin; Sijiu Wang; José G Pérez-Ramos; Timothy D V Dye; Deborah J Ossip Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Julia C Schechter; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Cathrine Hoyo; Susan K Murphy; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Scott H Kollins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 3.390