Literature DB >> 24642554

The efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection in patients with impaired renal function.

Adam Weston1, Yoav Golan, Christina Holcroft, David R Snydman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding the efficacy of daptomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections in patients with impaired renal function are reflected in a recent package insert change by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, this decision was based on a small subgroup analysis and it is unclear if this is a true association.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MRSA bacteremia treated at a tertiary hospital from 2001 to 2011 and who received either vancomycin or daptomycin. We used propensity score and multivariable logistic regression to assess the outcome of treatment failure, via blinded adjudication, in daptomycin- vs vancomycin-treated subjects and the interaction with renal function.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were analyzed, 100 in the vancomycin arm and 50 in the daptomycin arm. The average age was 61 years, and 60% were men. Of patients treated with daptomycin or vancomycin, 29 (58%) and 51 (51%), respectively, had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <50 mL/minute/1.73 m(2). Compared with vancomycin, the usage of daptomycin in patients was not significantly associated with treatment failure in patients with a GFR >50 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], .11 -1.79), nor in patients with a GFR of <50 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, .11 -1.94). There was no significant interaction between them (P = .54).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MRSA bacteremia, daptomycin efficacy was not affected by GFR level and was similar to vancomycin's efficacy. Although our sample size was small, it was larger than than the one used by the FDA. However, smaller differences may be significant with a larger sample size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bloodstream infection; daptomycin; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); renal failure; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24642554      PMCID: PMC4017894          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  6 in total

1.  Early use of daptomycin versus vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration >1 mg/L: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Kyle P Murray; Jing J Zhao; Susan L Davis; Ravina Kullar; Keith S Kaye; Paul Lephart; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Daptomycin versus vancomycin for bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration: a case-control study.

Authors:  Carol L Moore; Paola Osaki-Kiyan; Nadia Z Haque; Mary Beth Perri; Susan Donabedian; Marcus J Zervos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Validation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in advanced chronic renal failure.

Authors:  J L Teruel Briones; A Gomis Couto; J Sabater; M Fernández Lucas; N Rodríguez Mendiola; J J Villafruela; C Quereda
Journal:  Nefrologia       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.033

4.  Site of infection rather than vancomycin MIC predicts vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  Carla J Walraven; Michael S North; Lisa Marr-Lyon; Paulina Deming; George Sakoulas; Renée-Claude Mercier
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Clinical outcomes of patients receiving daptomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections and assessment of clinical factors for daptomycin failure: a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Jack Brown; Kenneth C Lamp; Lawrence V Friedrich; Kimberly C Lindfield
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Predicting risk for death from MRSA bacteremia.

Authors:  Mina Pastagia; Lawrence C Kleinman; Eliesel G Lacerda de la Cruz; Stephen G Jenkins
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.883

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Evan J Zasowski; Anthony M Casapao; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Jerod L Nagel; Cynthia T Nguyen; Jessica A Hallesy; Mathew T Compton; Keith S Kaye; Donald P Levine; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review.

Authors:  Thomas L Holland; Christopher Arnold; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Point-Counterpoint: Should Clinical Microbiology Laboratories Report Vancomycin MICs?

Authors:  Sara L Revolinski; Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Efficacy and Safety of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus&amp;nbsp;aureus with Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration &gt; 1 µg/mL: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Masaru Samura; Yuki Kitahiro; Sho Tashiro; Hiromu Moriyama; Yuna Hamamura; Isamu Takahata; Rina Kawabe; Yuki Enoki; Kazuaki Taguchi; Yoshio Takesue; Kazuaki Matsumoto
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 5.  Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Kellie J Goodlet; David P Nicolau; Michael D Nailor
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.