Literature DB >> 24642537

Field hydration state varies among tropical frog species with different habitat use.

Christopher R Tracy1, Thomas Tixier, Camille Le Nöene, Keith A Christian.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that ecological habit (e.g., arboreal, terrestrial, amphibious) correlates with thermoregulatory behaviors and water balance physiology among species of hylid frogs in northern Australia. We hypothesized that these frogs would be different with respect to their field hydration states because of the challenges associated with the different ecological habits. There are very few data on the hydration levels that frogs maintain in the field, and the existing data are from disparate species and locations and do not relate hydration state to habit or changes in seasonal water availability. We measured the hydration state of 15 species of frogs from tropical northern Australia to determine the influences of ecological habit and season on the hydration state that these frogs maintain. As predicted, frogs were significantly less hydrated in the dry season than they were in the wet season and showed significantly higher variation among individuals, suggesting that maintaining hydration is more challenging in the dry season. In the wet season, terrestrial species were significantly less hydrated than arboreal or amphibious species. During the dry season, amphibious species that sought refuge in cracking mud after the pond dried were significantly less hydrated than terrestrial or arboreal species. These data suggest that hydration behaviors and voluntary tolerance of dehydration vary with habitat use, even within closely related species in the same family or genus. Terrestrial and arboreal species might be expected to be the most vulnerable to changes in water availability, because they are somewhat removed from water sources, but the physiological characteristics of arboreal frogs that result in significant cutaneous resistance to water loss allow them to reduce the effects of their dehydrating microenvironment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24642537     DOI: 10.1086/674537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  8 in total

1.  Hydroregulation in a tropical dry-skinned ectotherm.

Authors:  Anna F V Pintor; Lin Schwarzkopf; Andrew K Krockenberger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Hydrothermal physiology and climate vulnerability in amphibians.

Authors:  Dan A Greenberg; Wendy J Palen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Relation between Water Balance and Climatic Variables Associated with the Geographical Distribution of Anurans.

Authors:  Braz Titon; Fernando Ribeiro Gomes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Locomotor performance of cane toads differs between native-range and invasive populations.

Authors:  Georgia Kosmala; Keith Christian; Gregory Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Ecological patterns in the skin microbiota of frogs from tropical Australia.

Authors:  Keith Christian; Chava Weitzman; Alea Rose; Mirjam Kaestli; Karen Gibb
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Physiological control of water exchange in anurans.

Authors:  Lee A Lemenager; Christopher R Tracy; Keith A Christian; C Richard Tracy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Comparative transcriptome analyses of seven anurans reveal functions and adaptations of amphibian skin.

Authors:  Li Huang; Jun Li; Housseni Anboukaria; Zhenhua Luo; Mian Zhao; Hua Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Trading heat and hops for water: Dehydration effects on locomotor performance, thermal limits, and thermoregulatory behavior of a terrestrial toad.

Authors:  Rodolfo C O Anderson; Denis V Andrade
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.