BACKGROUND: Robotic training can help improve function of a paretic limb following a stroke, but individuals respond differently to the training. A predictor of functional gains might improve the ability to select those individuals more likely to benefit from robot-based therapy. Studies evaluating predictors of functional improvement after a robotic training are scarce. One study has found that white matter tract integrity predicts functional gains following a robotic training of the hand and wrist. Objective. To determine the predictive ability of behavioral and brain measures in order to improve selection of individuals for robotic training. METHODS: Twenty subjects with chronic stroke participated in an 8-week course of robotic exoskeletal training for the arm. Before training, a clinical evaluation, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were each measured as predictors. Final functional gain was defined as change in the Box and Block Test (BBT). Measures significant in bivariate analysis were fed into a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: Training was associated with an average gain of 6 ± 5 blocks on the BBT (P < .0001). Bivariate analysis revealed that lower baseline motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on TMS, and lower laterality M1 index on fMRI each significantly correlated with greater BBT change. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, baseline MEP magnitude was the only measure that remained significant. CONCLUSION: Subjects with lower baseline MEP magnitude benefited the most from robotic training of the affected arm. These subjects might have reserve remaining for the training to boost corticospinal excitability, translating into functional gains.
BACKGROUND: Robotic training can help improve function of a paretic limb following a stroke, but individuals respond differently to the training. A predictor of functional gains might improve the ability to select those individuals more likely to benefit from robot-based therapy. Studies evaluating predictors of functional improvement after a robotic training are scarce. One study has found that white matter tract integrity predicts functional gains following a robotic training of the hand and wrist. Objective. To determine the predictive ability of behavioral and brain measures in order to improve selection of individuals for robotic training. METHODS: Twenty subjects with chronic stroke participated in an 8-week course of robotic exoskeletal training for the arm. Before training, a clinical evaluation, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were each measured as predictors. Final functional gain was defined as change in the Box and Block Test (BBT). Measures significant in bivariate analysis were fed into a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: Training was associated with an average gain of 6 ± 5 blocks on the BBT (P < .0001). Bivariate analysis revealed that lower baseline motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on TMS, and lower laterality M1 index on fMRI each significantly correlated with greater BBT change. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, baseline MEP magnitude was the only measure that remained significant. CONCLUSION: Subjects with lower baseline MEP magnitude benefited the most from robotic training of the affected arm. These subjects might have reserve remaining for the training to boost corticospinal excitability, translating into functional gains.
Authors: Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Peter R Smale; James P Coxon; Melanie K Fleming; Winston D Byblow Journal: Brain Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Peter S Lum; Charles G Burgar; Peggy C Shor; Matra Majmundar; Machiel Van der Loos Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Cinzia Calautti; Marcello Naccarato; Peter S Jones; Nikhil Sharma; Diana D Day; Adrian T Carpenter; Edward T Bullmore; Elizabeth A Warburton; Jean-Claude Baron Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Marie-Hélène Milot; Steven J Spencer; Vicky Chan; James P Allington; Julius Klein; Cathy Chou; James E Bobrow; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Lara A Boyd; Kathryn S Hayward; Nick S Ward; Cathy M Stinear; Charlotte Rosso; Rebecca J Fisher; Alexandre R Carter; Alex P Leff; David A Copland; Leeanne M Carey; Leonardo G Cohen; D Michele Basso; Jane M Maguire; Steven C Cramer Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: David A Cunningham; Andre Machado; Daniel Janini; Nicole Varnerin; Corin Bonnett; Guang Yue; Stephen Jones; Mark Lowe; Erik Beall; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Dalia De Santis; Jacopo Zenzeri; Maura Casadio; Lorenzo Masia; Assunta Riva; Pietro Morasso; Valentina Squeri Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Suellen M Andrade; Natanael A Santos; Bernardino Fernández-Calvo; Paulo S Boggio; Eliane A Oliveira; José J Ferreira; Amanda Sobreira; Felipe Morgan; Germana Medeiros; Gyovanna S Cavalcanti; Ingrid D Gadelha; Jader Duarte; Joercia Marrocos; Michele A Silva; Thatiana Rufino; Sanmy R Nóbrega Journal: Trials Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 2.279