Literature DB >> 24642382

Corticospinal excitability as a predictor of functional gains at the affected upper limb following robotic training in chronic stroke survivors.

Marie-Hélène Milot1, Steven J Spencer2, Vicky Chan2, James P Allington2, Julius Klein2, Cathy Chou2, Kristin Pearson-Fuhrhop2, James E Bobrow2, David J Reinkensmeyer2, Steven C Cramer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic training can help improve function of a paretic limb following a stroke, but individuals respond differently to the training. A predictor of functional gains might improve the ability to select those individuals more likely to benefit from robot-based therapy. Studies evaluating predictors of functional improvement after a robotic training are scarce. One study has found that white matter tract integrity predicts functional gains following a robotic training of the hand and wrist. Objective. To determine the predictive ability of behavioral and brain measures in order to improve selection of individuals for robotic training.
METHODS: Twenty subjects with chronic stroke participated in an 8-week course of robotic exoskeletal training for the arm. Before training, a clinical evaluation, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were each measured as predictors. Final functional gain was defined as change in the Box and Block Test (BBT). Measures significant in bivariate analysis were fed into a multivariate linear regression model.
RESULTS: Training was associated with an average gain of 6 ± 5 blocks on the BBT (P < .0001). Bivariate analysis revealed that lower baseline motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on TMS, and lower laterality M1 index on fMRI each significantly correlated with greater BBT change. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, baseline MEP magnitude was the only measure that remained significant.
CONCLUSION: Subjects with lower baseline MEP magnitude benefited the most from robotic training of the affected arm. These subjects might have reserve remaining for the training to boost corticospinal excitability, translating into functional gains.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  function; predictor; robot; stroke; training

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24642382      PMCID: PMC4167999          DOI: 10.1177/1545968314527351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  34 in total

1.  Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical dimensions of ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  M P Alexander; E Baker; M A Naeser; E Kaplan; C Palumbo
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos; Sue E Leurgans; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Systematic assessment of training-induced changes in corticospinal output to hand using frameless stereotaxic transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; Erin D Kleim; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; Lucy Der-Yeghiaian; Vu Le; Rehan R Motiwala; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Peter R Smale; James P Coxon; Melanie K Fleming; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke.

Authors:  G Uswatte; E Taub; D Morris; K Light; P A Thompson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Charles G Burgar; Peggy C Shor; Matra Majmundar; Machiel Van der Loos
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: A 3T fMRI study.

Authors:  Cinzia Calautti; Marcello Naccarato; Peter S Jones; Nikhil Sharma; Diana D Day; Adrian T Carpenter; Edward T Bullmore; Elizabeth A Warburton; Jean-Claude Baron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Leonard E Kahn; Michele L Zygman; W Zev Rymer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Milot; Steven J Spencer; Vicky Chan; James P Allington; Julius Klein; Cathy Chou; James E Bobrow; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  18 in total

1.  Biomarkers of stroke recovery: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Authors:  Lara A Boyd; Kathryn S Hayward; Nick S Ward; Cathy M Stinear; Charlotte Rosso; Rebecca J Fisher; Alexandre R Carter; Alex P Leff; David A Copland; Leeanne M Carey; Leonardo G Cohen; D Michele Basso; Jane M Maguire; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.266

2.  Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke Quinlan; Lucy Dodakian; Jill See; Alison McKenzie; Vu Le; Mike Wojnowicz; Babak Shahbaba; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Merav R Senesh; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Assessment of inter-hemispheric imbalance using imaging and noninvasive brain stimulation in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Andre Machado; Daniel Janini; Nicole Varnerin; Corin Bonnett; Guang Yue; Stephen Jones; Mark Lowe; Erik Beall; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Robot-assisted training of the kinesthetic sense: enhancing proprioception after stroke.

Authors:  Dalia De Santis; Jacopo Zenzeri; Maura Casadio; Lorenzo Masia; Assunta Riva; Pietro Morasso; Valentina Squeri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  MRI Biomarkers for Hand-Motor Outcome Prediction and Therapy Monitoring following Stroke.

Authors:  U Horn; M Grothe; M Lotze
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  Individual predictors of sensorimotor adaptability.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg; Brian T Peters
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-06

8.  tDCS and Robotics on Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Effect Modification by Stroke Duration and Type of Stroke.

Authors:  Sofia Straudi; Felipe Fregni; Carlotta Martinuzzi; Claudia Pavarelli; Stefano Salvioli; Nino Basaglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Stroke Treatment Associated with Rehabilitation Therapy and Transcranial DC Stimulation (START-tDCS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Suellen M Andrade; Natanael A Santos; Bernardino Fernández-Calvo; Paulo S Boggio; Eliane A Oliveira; José J Ferreira; Amanda Sobreira; Felipe Morgan; Germana Medeiros; Gyovanna S Cavalcanti; Ingrid D Gadelha; Jader Duarte; Joercia Marrocos; Michele A Silva; Thatiana Rufino; Sanmy R Nóbrega
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Baseline predictors of treatment gains in peak propulsive force in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  HaoYuan Hsiao; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.