Literature DB >> 24641718

Data considerations in ischemic stroke trials.

David S Liebeskind, Edward Feldmann.   

Abstract

Data drive the analyses of any ischemic stroke trial, culminating in the main results and potential next steps. The distinct purpose of a given trial, advancing a novel treatment or examining routine clinical practice, determines the nature of essential data elements. Information gathering for an effective trial depends on ample data, adequate infrastructure, and properly planned statistical analyses. This review highlights the fact that successful future trials will require appropriate expertise that extends far beyond these basic considerations in order to move from identification of basic risk factors that are associated with outcomes to knowledge of pathophysiology and causation of outcomes. Efficient and productive data collection by local and central sites must be complemented by expert core lab adjudications. Source data archiving, including complete DICOM imaging datasets or biological specimens, are needed to maximize the potential for study interpretation and financial investment. Standard terminology, such as common data elements and definitions, enhance study comparisons. Screening logs attest to generalizability of a study. Real-time data transmission and core lab evaluation will be critical to guide adaptive trial design. Despite the overwhelming focus on the intervention in a particular treatment trial, individual pathophysiology must be considered. Understanding individual subject characteristics is a tenet of the coming era of precision stroke care, where the course of a given patient and eventual outcome is paramount. This will require a new approach to data collection in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials,; Data,; Outcomes,; Precision; Stroke,; Treatment,

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24641718      PMCID: PMC4156583          DOI: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  20 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study.

Authors:  Gregory W Albers; Vincent N Thijs; Lawrence Wechsler; Stephanie Kemp; Gottfried Schlaug; Elaine Skalabrin; Roland Bammer; Wataru Kakuda; Maarten G Lansberg; Ashfaq Shuaib; William Coplin; Scott Hamilton; Michael Moseley; Michael P Marks
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.

Authors:  David S Liebeskind; Chelsea S Kidwell; James W Sayre; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Trends in acute ischemic stroke trials through the 20th century.

Authors:  C S Kidwell; D S Liebeskind; S Starkman; J L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Collateral therapeutics for cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.618

5.  Refining the definition of the malignant profile: insights from the DEFUSE-EPITHET pooled data set.

Authors:  Michael Mlynash; Maarten G Lansberg; Deidre A De Silva; Jun Lee; Soren Christensen; Matus Straka; Bruce C V Campbell; Roland Bammer; Jean-Marc Olivot; Patricia Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Relationships between cerebral perfusion and reversibility of acute diffusion lesions in DEFUSE: insights from RADAR.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Olivot; Michael Mlynash; Vincent N Thijs; Archana Purushotham; Stephanie Kemp; Maarten G Lansberg; Lawrence Wechsler; Roland Bammer; Michael P Marks; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Relationships between infarct growth, clinical outcome, and early recanalization in diffusion and perfusion imaging for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE).

Authors:  Jean-Marc Olivot; Michael Mlynash; Vincent N Thijs; Stephanie Kemp; Maarten G Lansberg; Lawrence Wechsler; Gottfried Schlaug; Roland Bammer; Michael P Marks; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Evaluation of the clinical-diffusion and perfusion-diffusion mismatch models in DEFUSE.

Authors:  Maarten G Lansberg; Vincent N Thijs; Scott Hamilton; Gottfried Schlaug; Roland Bammer; Stephanie Kemp; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Optimal outcome measures for detecting clinical benefits of early reperfusion: insights from the DEFUSE Study.

Authors:  Wataru Kakuda; Scott Hamilton; Vincent N Thijs; Maarten G Lansberg; Stephanie Kemp; Elaine Skalabrin; Gregory W Albers
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Patients with acute stroke treated with intravenous tPA 3-6 hours after stroke onset: correlations between MR angiography findings and perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging in the DEFUSE study.

Authors:  Michael P Marks; Jean-Marc Olivot; Stephanie Kemp; Maarten G Lansberg; Roland Bammer; Lawrence R Wechsler; Gregory W Albers; Vincent Thijs
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Temporal Changes in Care Processes and Outcomes for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Retrospective Registry Data from Three Korean Centers.

Authors:  Jin Soo Lee; Seong-Joon Lee; Ji Man Hong; Jin Wook Choi; Jeong-Ho Hong; Hyuk-Won Chang; Chang-Hyun Kim; Yong-Won Kim; Dong-Hun Kang; Yong-Sun Kim; Bruce Ovbiagele; Andrew M Demchuk; Yang-Ha Hwang; Sung-Il Sohn
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2018-03-02

Review 2.  Endothelial Shear Stress and Platelet FcγRIIa Expression in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.

Authors:  David S Liebeskind; Jason D Hinman; Naoki Kaneko; Hiroaki Kitajima; Tristan Honda; Adam H De Havenon; Edward Feldmann; Raul G Nogueira; Shyam Prabhakaran; Jose G Romano; Peter W Callas; David J Schneider
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.