Literature DB >> 24641384

A new D-dimer cutoff value to improve the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients.

Chong Chen1, Gang Li, Yun-De Liu, Ya-Jun Gu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find a more appropriate alternative to D-dimer cutoff value for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in cancer patients.
METHODS: A total of 711 cancer patients with symptoms suspicious of DVT were included in the study. D-dimer levels were assessed using ELISA. All patients were subjected to imaging procedures.
RESULTS: Among 711 patients with cancer, 466 (65.5%) were females and 245 (34.5%) were males, with an average age of 57.3 ± 13.23 years. The mean age in the DVT group was significantly higher than in the non-DVT group (P<0.05). The D-dimer levels of the DVT group were significantly higher than those of the non-DVT group (P<0.05). The incidence rate of DVT varied significantly according to cancer type (P<0.05). Increasing age and lung cancer were significantly correlated with D-dimer levels (P<0.05), and a one-year increase in age was associated with a 14.28 ng/ml increase in the D-dimer value. The optimal cutoff point for D-dimer was found to be 981 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 86.4%, specificity of 79.4%, and accuracy of 82.6%. If the D-dimer cutoff point was set to 981 ng/ml, the specificity would increase from 61.8% to 85.5% without loss of sensitivity in patients aged 40 years or younger. In patients aged more than 40 years, the new cutoff almost doubled the specificity with slightly reduced sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: In cancer patients, a new cutoff value of 981 ng/ml effectively improved the exclusion of DVT, especially for patients aged more than 40 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24641384     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  6 in total

1.  Application of an elevated plasma D-dimer cut-off value improves prognosis prediction of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Chong Chen; Jianhua Li; Jing Li; Xu Wang; Xiaoyan Wang; Na Du; Li Ren
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-09

Review 2.  Biomarkers for the detection of apparent and subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Lars Michel; Tienush Rassaf; Matthias Totzeck
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant musculoskeletal tumors: an analysis based on D-dimer screening and imaging.

Authors:  Kenta Hayashida; Yusuke Kawabata; Keiju Saito; Shintaro Fujita; Hyonmin Choe; Ikuma Kato; Masanobu Takeyama; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section.

Authors:  Limin Zhang; Yunqiu Chen; Wenjuan Liu; Xinzhuo Wang; Shuang Zhang; Wenyan Zhang; Shuai Zhao; Miaomiao Zhang; Su Zhang; Guangyu Jiao
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.317

5.  Case of internal jugular vein thrombosis and fever: Lemierre's syndrome or Trousseau's syndrome?

Authors:  Meng-Yu Wu; Yueh-Tseng Hou; Jian-Yu Ke; Giou-Teng Yiang
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-06

6.  Risk factors, risk assessment, and prognosis in patients with gynecological cancer and thromboembolism.

Authors:  Xindan Wang; Jing Huang; Zhao Bingbing; Shape Li; Li Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 1.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.