Two complementary approaches for the preparation of linked 5-membered heterocycles were developed. The Pd-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling with halogenated furan, thiophene, and selenophene led to higher overall yields, but C,H-bond activation was a more efficient strategy for the coupling at C(2) of oxazoles. Potency and selectivity of the final hydroxymethyl products in renal (A498), lung (NCI-H226), kidney (CAKI-1), and breast (MDA-MB-468, MCF7) carcinoma cell lines were determined.
Two complementary approaches for the preparation of linked 5-membered heterocycles were developed. The Pd-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling with halogenated furan, thiophene, and selenophene led to higher overall yields, but C,H-bond activation was a more efficient strategy for the coupling at C(2) of oxazoles. Potency and selectivity of the final hydroxymethyl products in renal (A498), lung (NCI-H226), kidney (CAKI-1), and breast (MDA-MB-468, MCF7) carcinoma cell lines were determined.
Five-membered heterocycles represent
approximately half of the top 20 most common aromatic ring systems
present in biologically active compounds.[1] They also frequently occur in natural products.[2] Their relative ease of synthesis from readily available
precursors and their steric and electronic plasticity contribute to
this popularity. As an extension of our synthetic studies on anticancer
furans,[3] thiophenes,[4] oxazoles,[5] and thiazoles,[6] we became interested in the attractive cell-specific
toxicity profile (i.e., the hyperselective growth inhibition) of terfuran 1, in comparison to the broad-based toxicity of the thiophene-furan
heterocyclic triad RITA (2, Figure 1).[7] The latter compound, also known as
NSC 652287, has been shown to exhibit potent antiproliferative activity
in various cancer cell lines, in particular in the renal cell line
A498.[8] The mechanism of action of 2 has been the topic of much speculation. An interaction between 2 and the N-terminal domain of p53 was suggested
to interfere with HDM2 binding and degradation of p53.[9] Other p53-mediated functions such as the regulation of
pro- and antiapoptotic genes are also influenced by 2, in addition to induction of autophagy, downregulation of c-Myc,
cyclin E and β-catenin oncogene expression, and inhibition of
the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.[10] Among
a series of analogues of 2, terthiophene 3 was recently found to exhibit only weak activity against a p53 knockout
cancer cell line but activated p53 and triggered apoptosis in wild-type
HCT116 at low nanomolar concentrations.[11] The primary alcohol group in these compounds proved to be essential
for bioactivity and possibly acts as a prodrug that is metabolized
to the active agent within the cell.[12] Interestingly,
the corresponding esters and aldehydes were significantly less active
in the National Cancer Institute NCI-60 screen.[13]
Figure 1
Structures of selective antiproliferative furan and thiophene triads 1, RITA (reactivation of p53 and induction of tumor cell apoptosis, 2), and 3.
Structures of selective antiproliferative furan and thiophene triads 1, RITA (reactivation of p53 and induction of tumor cell apoptosis, 2), and 3.With the goal of improving synthetic accessibility and enabling
further SAR studies of heterocyclic triads such as terfuran 1,[7,11,14] which provides
hyperselective inhibition of exceptionally responding cells, we developed
two alternative strategies to attach substituted heterocycles to a
dihalogenated core. First, we utilized the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling
of commercially available furan boronic acid 5a and readily
accessible dibrominated heterocycles 4a–c to prepare dialdehydes 6a–c (Scheme 1). After screening several Pd(0)/ligand
combinations, we found that Pd2(dba)3 and tri-tert-butylphosphine under microwave conditions provided
the best yield of 51% for 6a.[15] Other ligands such as JohnPhos, triisopropylphosphine, and tricyclohexylphosphine
gave yields <25% of 6a. We also attempted to achieve
a monocoupling of 5a in the presence of an excess of
dibromide 4a and ligand XPhos;[16] however, bis-coupling product 6a remained the major
product. In comparison, Pd(PPh3)4 with tetra-N-butylammonium bromide as an additive mainly gave the monocoupled
product.[17]
Scheme 1
Tandem Suzuki–Miyaura
Cross-Coupling of 2,5-Dibrominated Furan,
Thiophene, and Selenophene and Reduction to Diols
Bis-couplings at the 2,5-positions of dibrominated
thiophene 4b and selenophene 4c were achieved
in excellent
yields under the conditions optimized for furan 4a (Scheme 1). Interestingly, yellow precipitates of triads 6b and 6c formed at room temperature immediately
after addition of the reaction components, and aldehyde 6b was obtained in >70% yield after stirring overnight. These mild
conditions can improve the scalability of the cross-coupling process.
While the coupling proceeds well even at room temperature, microwave
heating, greatly expedited the completion of the reaction without
causing decomposition. Finally, reduction with NaBH4 furnished
the alcohols 1 and 7b,c in
excellent yields.Regioisomeric thiophene analogues were obtained
by bis-coupling
of 5a to 3,4-dibromothiophene (4d), 2,5-dimethyl-3,4-dibromothiophene
(4e), and 2,4-dibromothiophene (4f) (Scheme 2). Due to the lower reactivity at C(3) of thiophene,[18] we increased catalyst loadings and equivalents
of boronic acid 5a in order to facilitate the formation
of bis-coupled products. Finally, NaBH4 reduction furnished
the diols 7d–f. NMR analysis of the
reaction mixture of analogue 7d showed signs of decomposition
after mild heating at ca. 50 °C, presumably due to side reactions
as a consequence of the high reactivity of the unsubstituted thiopheneC(2) and C(5) positions.
Scheme 2
Tandem Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling
of 3,4-and 2,4-Dibrominated
Thiophene and Reduction to Diols
Lead structure 1 and analogues 7b–f could be rapidly assembled using these optimized
Suzuki–Miyaura
conditions, adding two identical heterocyclic end groups to the core
structure in one cross-coupling step. Moreover, a related stepwise
approach was readily identified that allowed a variation of the terminal
heterocycles and access to desymmetrized products. Commercially available
bromothiophene 4g and furan boronic acid 5b were combined at C(5) and C(2), respectively, and the furanC(5)
position was subsequently brominated with N-bromosuccinimide
and benzoyl peroxide[19] to yield aldehyde 8 in 61% yield over the two steps (Scheme 3). Cross-coupling of 8 with furan boronic acid 5a led to the bisfuranylthiophene triad 6g in
78% yield, and reduction of the two aldehyde functional groups with
NaBH4 provided diol 7g in 90% yield.
Scheme 3
Sequential
Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling of 5-Bromothiophene
and Reduction to Diol
A significant further diversification of the scaffold
of the heterocyclic
triads 1 and 7b–g was
envisioned by an isosteric replacement of the terminal furan and thiophene
rings with oxazole moieties. However, while the requisite ethyl 2-iodo-4-oxazole
carboxylate building block was readily prepared,[20] neither Suzuki–Miyaura nor Negishi cross-couplings
provided more than trace amounts of the desired products.[21]The challenge of functionalizing and coupling
oxazoles[22] can be addressed more directly
with a regioselective
arylation of a C(2)-unsubstituted oxazole. Hoarau’s group,
for example, reported a successful arylation of both the C(2)- and
C(5)-positions of commercially available 9 using palladium
catalysis.[23] The electron-withdrawing nature
of the ester group in 9 was found to be important for
the reactivity of the oxazole, particularly for the activation of
the C(2)carbon–hydrogen bond. While our attempts to couple
the alcohol and aldehyde derivatives of 9 under these
conditions were unsuccessful, we found that reactivity is also influenced
by the position of the ester substituent on the oxazole ring. When
we attempted a coupling with ethyl 5-oxazole carboxylate, only 5%
of the bis-coupled product was isolated, reinforcing the apparent
need for an electron-withdrawing group at C(4). We were pleased to
find that 9 underwent a C(2)-selective tandem C–H
bond activation/cross-coupling with both 4b and 4c under Hoarau’s conditions to furnish esters 10b and 10c in satisfactory yields (Scheme 4). Finally, LiAlH4 reduction provided
access to the desired alcohols 11b and 11c in good yields.
Scheme 4
Sequential Pd-Catalyzed C–H Bond Activation/Cross
Coupling
of Oxazoles with Dibromothiophene and Dibromoselenophene and Reduction
to Diol
Diols 1, 2, 7b–e,g, and 11b,c as well
as aldehyde 6c were evaluated in the NCI 60-cell line
panel[24] for selective anticancer activity.[25] Table 1 shows the concentrations
required to achieve 50% growth inhibition (GI50) in the
two most sensitive cancer cell lines.
Table 1
Growth Inhibition in Renal (A498),
Lung (NCI-H226), Kidney (CAKI-1), and Breast (MDA-MB-468, MCF7) Cancer
Cell Lines
compd
NSC no.
GI50a (μM)
GI50b (μM)
1
672348
0.18 (A498)
0.58 (NCI-H226)
2
652287
0.012 (CAKI-1)
0.015 (A498)
7b
773097
0.13 (A498)
0.17 (MDA-MB-468)
6c
773393
0.30 (A498)
6.3 (MCF7)
7c
773392
0.17 (A498)
0.22 (MDA-MB-468)
7d
777422
0.015 (A498)
0.074 (MDA-MB-468)
7e
778301
0.016 (MDA-MB-468)
0.018 (A498)
7g
777196
0.016 (A498)
0.018 (MDA-MB-468)
Most sensitive
cell line.
Next most sensitive
cell line.
With the exception of
oxazole-containing analogues 11b and 11c, which provided no significant cell growth
inhibition at 10 μM concentration, the heterocyclic triads were,
in general, more toxic to the renal cell line A498 than other cell
lines (Table 1). Of the tested compounds, those
with the 3,4-substitution pattern on a central thiophene, i.e., 7d and 7e, were the most potent, in addition
to the desymmetrized triad 7g, which combined two 2,5-substituted
furans with a 2,5-substituted thiophene terminus. The latter compound
is remarkably more potent (10×) than its sequence isomer 7b. Overall, the cellular toxicity profiles of 7d, 7e, and 7g were similar to compound 2. On the other hand, compounds 7b and 7c, similar to 1, were less potent but more hyperselective
in the NCI 60-cell line panel (data not shown). Aldehyde 6c also showed a significant 20-fold drop off in activity from the
most sensitive cell line (A498) to the next most sensitive one (MCF7).Most sensitive
cell line.Next most sensitive
cell line.In conclusion,
we have developed and optimized two complementary
synthetic protocols for the preparation of the nine heterocyclic triads 1, 7b–g, and 11b,c. First, we identified a catalytic Pd system for the
direct Suzuki–Miyaura tandem cross-coupling of commercially
available furan boronic acids with dibromofuran, -thiophene, and -selenophene.
In a variation of this protocol, the sequential cross-coupling of
a bromothiophene provided the desymmetrized triad 7g.
Second, we utilized a Pd-catalyzed C,H-bond activation at C(2) of
oxazole ester 9 to assemble the bis-oxazole triads 11b and 11c from dibromothiophene 4b and dibromoselenophene 4c in good yields and high synthetic
efficiency. Biological evaluation provided a significant extension
of the SAR information available for the parent terfuran 1 and allows for an examination of the effects of heterocyclic sequence
and connectivity patterns on cancer cell toxicity. Ongoing studies,
including in vivo xenograft models, aim to determine if a broad spectrum
pattern of high cellular activity (as demonstrated by 2, 7d, 7e, and 7g) or lower
cellular activity paired with hyperselectivity (as demonstrated by 1, 6c, 7b, and 7c)
are predictive of a greater therapeutic index in this series.
Authors: S D Mertins; T G Myers; M Hollingshead; D Dykes; E Bodde; P Tsai; C A Jefferis; R Gupta; W M Linehan; M Alley; S E Bates Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: W Nieves-Neira; M I Rivera; G Kohlhagen; M L Hursey; P Pourquier; E A Sausville; Y Pommier Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Natalia Issaeva; Przemyslaw Bozko; Martin Enge; Marina Protopopova; Lisette G G C Verhoef; Maria Masucci; Aladdin Pramanik; Galina Selivanova Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-11-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Brian D Peyser; Ann Hermone; Joseph M Salamoun; James C Burnett; Melinda G Hollingshead; Connor F McGrath; Rick Gussio; Peter Wipf Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Adrian L Pietkiewicz; Yuqi Zhang; Marwa N Rahimi; Michael Stramandinoli; Matthew Teusner; Shelli R McAlpine Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 4.345