| Literature DB >> 24639673 |
Jong H Kim1, Noreen Mahoney1, Kathleen L Chan1, Bruce C Campbell1, Ronald P Haff1, Larry H Stanker1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine two benzo analogs, octylgallate (OG) and veratraldehyde (VT), as antifungal agents against strains of Aspergillus parasiticus and A.flavus (toxigenic or atoxigenic). Both toxigenic and atoxigenic strains used were capable of producing kojic acid, another cellular secondary product. A. fumigatus was used as a genetic model for this study. When applied independently, OG exhibits considerably higher antifungal activity compared to VT. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of OG were 0.3-0.5 mM, while that of VT were 3.0-5.0 mM in agar plate-bioassays. OG or VT in concert with the fungicide kresoxim methyl (Kre-Me; strobilurin) greatly enhanced sensitivity of Aspergillus strains to Kre-Me. The combination with OG also overcame the tolerance of A. fumigatus mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) mutants to Kre-Me. The degree of compound interaction resulting from chemosensitization of the fungi by OG was determined using checkerboard bioassays, where synergistic activity greatly lowered MICs or minimum fungicidal concentrations. However, the control chemosensitizer benzohydroxamic acid, an alternative oxidase inhibitor conventionally applied in concert with strobilurin, did not achieve synergism. The level of antifungal or chemosensitizing activity was also "compound-strain" specific, indicating differential susceptibility of tested strains to OG or VT, and/or heat stress. Besides targeting the antioxidant system, OG also negatively affected the cell wall-integrity pathway, as determined by the inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall-integrity MAPK pathway mutants. We concluded that certain benzo analogs effectively inhibit fungal growth. They possess chemosensitizing capability to increase efficacy of Kre-Me and thus, could reduce effective dosages of strobilurins and alleviate negative side effects associated with current antifungal practices. OG also exhibits moderate antiaflatoxigenic activity.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; aflatoxin; antioxidant system; cell wall integrity; chemosensitization; octylgallate; strobilurin; veratraldehyde
Year: 2014 PMID: 24639673 PMCID: PMC3945611 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Microbial strains used in this study.
| Plant pathogen (aflatoxin), Human pathogen (aspergillosis), Reference toxigenic (aflatoxin-producing) strain used for genome sequencing | NRRL | |
| Plant pathogen (aflatoxin), Human pathogen (aspergillosis) | NRRL | |
| Atoxigenic (aflatoxin non-producing) strain, A pesticide active ingredient displacing toxigenic fungus | NRRL, | |
| Atoxigenic strain, A pesticide active ingredient displacing toxigenic fungus | NRRL, Ehrlich and Cotty ( | |
| Plant pathogen (aflatoxin) | NRRL | |
| Plant pathogen (aflatoxin) | NRRL | |
| Human pathogen (aspergillosis), Parental strain, Reference clinical strain used for genome sequencing | Xue et al. ( | |
| Human pathogen (aspergillosis), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) gene deletion mutant derived from AF293 | Xue et al. ( | |
| Human pathogen (aspergillosis), MAPK gene deletion mutant derived from AF293 | Reyes et al. ( | |
| Model yeast, Parental strain (Mat a | (SGD) | |
| MAPK kinase kinase mutant derived from BY4741 | SGD | |
| MAPK mutant derived from BY4741 | SGD | |
NRRL, National Center for Agricultural Utilization and Research, USDA-ARS, Peoria, IL, USA.
Genome Database. Available online: .
Figure 1Structures of benzo analogs used in this study. (1) octylgallate (OG); (2) veratraldehyde (VT); (3) benzohydroxamic acid (BHAM).
Differential sensitivity of .
| 0.40 | >5.0 | 0 | |
| 0.40 | >5.0 | 0 | |
| 0.50 | >5.0 | 0 | |
| 0.45 | >5.0 | 1 | |
| 0.40 | >5.0 | 1 | |
| 0.50 | >5.0 | 1 | |
| 0.35 | 4.5 | 4 | |
| 0.30 | 4.5 | 4 | |
| 0.30 | 4.5 | 4 | |
| Average | 0.40 | >4.8 | 1.7 |
| – | – |
Concentrations (mM) are MICs examined on PDA plates.
Maximum day(s) of incubation at 55°C, which can result in growth recovery of fungi at 30°C.
VT was tested up to 5.0 mM. For statistical calculation (student's t-test) purpose, 10.0 mM (doubling of 5.0 mM) was used.
Student's t-test for paired data (MIC.
Responses of .
| 0.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.000 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 0.5 | 100 | 100 | 96 | 0.025 | 86 | 70 | 74 |
| 1.0 | 100 | 98 | 96 | 0.050 | 70 | 60 | 66 |
| 1.5 | 100 | 96 | 94 | 0.100 | 54 | 48 | 52 |
| 2.0 | 100 | 92 | 92 | 0.150 | 46 | 38 | 42 |
| 2.5 | 100 | 92 | 92 | 0.200 | 36 | 24 | 28 |
| 3.0 | 96 | 84 | 86 | 0.250 | 28 | few | few |
| 3.5 | 75 | 69 | 72 | 0.300 | few | ||
| 4.0 | few | few | few | 0.350 | |||
| 4.5 | 0.400 | ||||||
| 5.0 | 0.450 | ||||||
| 0.0 | 100 | 104 | 109 | 0.000 | 100 | 104 | 109 |
| 0.5 | 83 | 96 | 96 | 0.025 | 52 | few | few |
| 1.0 | 70 | 78 | 83 | 0.050 | |||
| 1.5 | 61 | 74 | 74 | 0.100 | |||
| 2.0 | 52 | 65 | 70 | 0.150 | |||
| 2.5 | 43 | 57 | 65 | 0.200 | |||
| 3.0 | 48 | 48 | 0.250 | ||||
| 3.5 | few | few | 0.300 | ||||
| 4.0 | 0.350 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 0.400 | ||||||
| 5.0 | 0.450 | ||||||
Data shown in the table are % radial growth of fungi compared to control (no treatment). SD < 5%. No visible cell growth (0%) is in bold.
Few: Only few colonies appeared.
Figure 2Differential sensitivity of Scheme showing A. flavus shares agro-infectivity with A. parasiticus, while it shares human-infectivity with A. fumigatus. (B) Fungal plate bioassay showing A. fumigatus strains were more tolerant to high temperature (55°C) compared to A. flavus or A. parasiticus. Control, Incubation at 30°C for 7 days; 1–7, Incubation at 55°C for 1, 2, 3, 4, or 7 days, then growth recovery at 30°C for 6, 5, 4, 3, or 0 days, respectively. Fungal growth is indicated as percent relative to control. Unlabeled plates showed no growth (0%).
Antifungal chemosensitization of OG (mM) or BHAM (mM) to Kre-Me (μg mL.
| Kre-Me | >32 | 2 | Kre-Me | >32 | 0.5 | |||
| OG | 0.2 | 0.025 | OG | 0.8 | 0.2 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 2 | Kre-Me | >32 | 0.5 | |||
| OG | 0.2 | 0.025 | OG | 0.8 | 0.2 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 2 | Kre-Me | >32 | 0.5 | |||
| OG | 0.2 | 0.025 | OG | >0.8 | 0.2 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 2 | Kre-Me | >32 | 2 | |||
| OG | 0.2 | 0.025 | OG | >0.8 | 0.1 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 4 | Kre-Me | >32 | 4 | |||
| OG | 0.2 | 0.025 | OG | >0.8 | 0.2 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 4 | Kre-Me | >32 | 1 | |||
| OG | 0.2 | 0.025 | OG | >0.8 | 0.2 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 1 | Kre-Me | >32 | 0.5 | |||
| OG | 0.1 | 0.0125 | OG | 0.2 | 0.1 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 1 | Kre-Me | >32 | 0.5 | |||
| OG | 0.1 | 0.0125 | OG | 0.1 | 0.05 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 1 | Kre-Me | >32 | 0.5 | |||
| OG | 0.1 | 0.0125 | OG | 0.1 | 0.05 | |||
| Mean | Kre-Me | 64.00 | 2.11 | Kre-Me | 64.00 | 1.11 | ||
| OG | 0.17 | 0.02 | OG | 0.93 | 0.14 | |||
| Kre-Me | – | – | Kre-Me | – | – | |||
| OG | – | – | OG | – | – | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 4 | 0.6 | Kre-Me | >32 | >32 | 2.0 | |
| BHAM | >0.8 | 0.8 | BHAM | >0.8 | >0.8 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 16 | 0.8 | Kre-Me | >32 | >32 | 2.0 | |
| BHAM | >0.8 | 0.8 | BHAM | >0.8 | >0.8 | |||
| Kre-Me | >32 | 16 | 0.8 | Kre-Me | >32 | >32 | 2.0 | |
| BHAM | >0.8 | 0.8 | BHAM | >0.8 | >0.8 | |||
| All other strains | Kre-Me | >32 | >32 | 2.0 | Kre-Me | >32 | >32 | 2.0 |
| BHAM | >0.8 | >0.8 | BHAM | >0.8 | >0.8 | |||
| Mean | Kre-Me | 64.00 | 46.67 | 1.6 | Kre-Me | 64.00 | 64.00 | 2.0 |
| BHAM | 1.60 | 1.33 | BHAM | 1.60 | 1.60 | |||
| Kre-Me | – | – | Kre-Me | – | ND | – | ||
| BHAM | – | – | BHAM | – | ND | – | ||
MIC, Minimum inhibitory concentration; MFC, Minimum fungicidal concentration; FICI, Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Indices; FFCI, Fractional Fungicidal Concentration Indices. Synergistic FICIs and FFCIs are in bold.
Kre-Me was tested up to 32 μg mL.
Student's t-test for paired data (combined, i.e., chemosensitization) was vs. mean MIC or MFC of each compound (alone, i.e., no chemosensitization) determined in strains.
BHAM was tested up to 0.8 mM. For calculation purpose, 1.6 mM (doubling of 0.8 mM) was used.
ND, Not determined (neutral interaction).
Figure 3Differential sensitivity of A. parasiticus 5862 was more sensitive to “Kre-Me + VT” compared to A. flavus 3357. (B) A. flavus 3357 showed higher sensitivity to “Kre-Me + OG” compared to A. parasiticus 5862. Results show differential sensitivity of each strain to different combinations of compounds.
Figure 4Chemosensitization test in . Results shown here are the determination of MFCs of antifungal agents. Co-application of Kre-Me (0.5 μg mL−1) with OG (0.10 or 0.05 mM for A. fumigatus WT or sakAΔ, respectively), completely inhibited the growth of A. fumigatus, while individual treatment of each compound, alone, at the same concentrations allowed the growth of fungi. The sakAΔ mutant was also more sensitive (viz. required lower concentration of OG) to the chemosensitization than the WT (AF293), indicating that the antioxidant system of Aspergillus plays an important role for fungal tolerance to the chemosensitization. On the other hand, co-application of Kre-Me with BHAM (conventional antifungal chemosensitizer disrupting AOX) at the same concentrations resulted in survival of A. fumigatus strains. Similar result was observed in A. fumigatus mpkCΔmutant (Figure data not shown).
Figure 5Chemosensitization test in aflatoxigenic . Exemplary MFC bioassay showing co-application of Kre-Me (0.5 μg mL−1) with OG (0.2 mM) completely inhibited the growth of aflatoxigenic A. flavus 3357 and 4212.
Figure 6Yeast cell-dilution bioassay showing sensitivity of . Similar remediation by sorbitol was found from treatment with higher concentration (0.04, 0.05, 0.06 mM) of OG (results not shown).
Antiaflatoxigenic activity of OG in .
| AFB1 | No OG | 5.920 ± 0.816 | 6.170 ± 0.816 | 16.100 ± 1.325 | 16.100 ± 2.904 |
| OG | 5.260 ± 0.663 | 5.460 ± 0.561 | 14.900 ± 1.119 | 15.200 ± 1.271 | |
| % Reduction | −11% | −12% | −7% | −6% | |
| AFB2 | No OG | 0.090 ± 0.020 | 0.031 ± 0.010 | 0.290 ± 0.046 | 0.290 ± 0.112 |
| OG | 0.066 ± 0.015 | 0.026 ± 0.005 | 0.260 ± 0.036 | 0.240 ± 0.033 | |
| % Reduction | −27 | −16 | −10 | −17 | |
| AFG1 | No OG | ND | ND | 4.030 ± 0.612 | 4.030 ± 1.581 |
| OG | ND | ND | 3.720 ± 0.510 | 3.870 ± 0.608 | |
| % Reduction | −8 | −4 | |||
| AFG2 | No OG | ND | ND | 0.090 ± 0.015 | 0.100 ± 0.040 |
| OG | ND | ND | 0.070 ± 0.010 | 0.070 ± 0.016 | |
| % Reduction | −22 | −30 |
Aflatoxin amount produced: μg per cm.
ND, Not detectable.