| Literature DB >> 24638258 |
Sandeep Kumar Vashist1, E Marion Schneider2, Edmond Lam3, Sabahudin Hrapovic3, John H T Luong4.
Abstract
An improved enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay using one-step antibody immobilization has been developed for the detection of human fetuin A (HFA), a specific biomarker for atherosclerosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The anti-HFA formed a stable complex with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) by ionic and hydrophobic interactions. The complex adsorbed on microtiter plates exhibited a detection range of 4.9 pg mL(-1) to 20 ng mL(-1) HFA, with a limit of detection of 7 pg mL(-1). Furthermore, an analytical sensitivity of 10 pg mL(-1) was achieved, representing a 51-fold increase in sensitivity over the commercial sandwich ELISA kit. The results obtained for HFA spiked in diluted human whole blood and plasma showed the same precision as the commercial kit. When stored at 4°C in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), the anti-HFA bound microtiter plates displayed no significant decrease in their functional activity after two months. The new ELISA procedure was extended for the detection of C-reactive protein, human albumin and human lipocalin-2 with excellent analytical performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24638258 PMCID: PMC3957147 DOI: 10.1038/srep04407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1One-step antibody immobilization-based sandwich ELISA procedure for the detection of human fetuin A (HFA).
Figure 2One-step antibody (Ab) immobilization-based sandwich ELISA.
(a) Detection of HFA by the NIF, covalent immobilization format (CovIF)-based59 and conventional immobilization format (CIF)-based (passive adsorption-based) sandwich ELISA procedures. (b) Specific HFA detection with respect to various experimental process controls. (c) Detection of HFA spiked in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4), diluted human whole blood and diluted human plasma. (d) Detection of HFA by the anti-HFA Ab-bound MTPs stored in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4 at 4°C for 8 weeks. All experiments were done in triplicate with the error bars representing the standard deviation.
Analytical comparison of the NIF with the conventional immobilization format (CIF) and covalent immobilization format (CovIF)-based59 sandwich ELISAs for the detection of HFA
| NIF | CovIF | CIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time required for antibody immobilization (h) | 0.5 | 2.5 | 14 |
| Assay duration (h) | ~4 | ~6 | ~20 |
| Detection range (pg mL−1) | 4.9–20,000 | 9.8–20,000 | 151–20,000 |
| LOD (pg mL−1) | 7 | 12 | 226 |
| Analytical sensitivity (pg mL−1) | 10 | 30 | 510 |
| EC50 (ng mL−1) | 2.6 | 3.4 | 5.8 |
| % CV | |||
| Intra-day (n = 5) | 1.2–8.5 | 2.4–10.4 | 4.7–17.4 |
| Inter-day (n = 5) | 2.1–10.2 | 1.7–17.6 | 3.6–20.0 |
| Assays on various substrates | Yes | Yes | No |
| Requirement for crosslinkers | No | Yes | No |
1NIF: new immobilization format by diluting antibody in APTES followed by physical adsorption on the microtiter plate (MTP).
2CovIF: covalent immobilization format by covalent crosslinking of antibody on an APTES modified MTP surface with EDC.
3CIF: conventional immobilization format by physical adsorption of antibody on the MTP.
Figure 3FTIR spectra pertaining to the APTES-functionalization and the immobilization of antibody on polystyrene (PS) surface.
Determination of spiked HFA concentrations in diluted human whole blood and plasma by NIF- and CIF-based sandwich ELISAs. The experiments were performed in triplicate, while the results are presented as mean ± S.D.
| Sample matrix | Added conc. (in ng/mL) | NIF-based sandwich ELISA | CIF-based sandwich ELISA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diluted human whole blood | 20 | 20.1 ± 0.19 | 20.2 ± 0.18 |
| 10 | 10.2 ± 0.16 | 10.3 ± 0.24 | |
| 5 | 5.0 ± 0.17 | 5.1 ± 0.09 | |
| 2.5 | 2.4 ± 0.09 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | |
| 1.2 | 1.3 ± 0.06 | 1.4 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.03 | 0.7 ± 0.03 | |
| 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | |
| Diluted human plasma | 20 | 20.2 ± 0.15 | 20.1 ± 0.17 |
| 10 | 10.1 ± 0.18 | 9.8 ± 0.16 | |
| 5 | 4.9 ± 0.19 | 4.7 ± 0.18 | |
| 2.5 | 2.5 ± 0.11 | 2.7 ± 0.12 | |
| 1.2 | 1.2 ± 0.08 | 1.3 ± 0.09 | |
| 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.04 | 0.5 ± 0.03 | |
| 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.01 |
Comparison of NIF with various sandwich ELISA procedures and the commercial kits for the detection of HFA
| Manufacturer/Immunoassay Procedures | Antibody binding | Sensitivity (ng mL−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| New ELISA format (NIF) | One-step | 0.01 | This work |
| ELISA-covalent binding of antibody | Covalent | 0.03 | This work |
| Conventional ELISA | Passively adsorbed | 0.5 | This work |
| RnD systems | Passively adsorbed | 0.37 | |
| Biovendor | Passively adsorbed | 0.35 | |
| Alpco Diagnostics | Passively adsorbed | 5.00 | |
| Immunology Consultants Laboratory, Inc. | Passively adsorbed | 6.25 | |
| Genway Biotech, Inc. | Passively adsorbed | 6.25 | |
| Assay Pro | Passively adsorbed | 6.25 |
Figure 4Immunoassays based the NIF for (a) C-reactive protein (CRP), (b) human albumin and (c) human lipocalin-2.
The NIF-based immunoassays were compared with the CIF and CovIF-based sandwich ELISAs. All experiments were done in triplicate with the error bars representing the standard deviation.