| Literature DB >> 24637211 |
Pannamthip Pitaksajjakul1, Surachet Benjathummarak2, Chonlatip Pipattanaboon2, Waranya Wongwit3, Tamaki Okabayashi4, Motoki Kuhara5, Ryo Misaki6, Kazuhito Fujiyama6, Pongrama Ramasoota7.
Abstract
Dengue virus (DENV), a re-emerging virus, constitutes the largest vector-borne disease virus, with 50-100 million cases reported every year. Although DENV infection induces lifelong immunity against viruses of the same serotypes, the subsequent infection with the heterologous serotypes can cause more severe form of the disease, such as Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever (DHF) or Dengue Shock Syndrome (DSS). However, there is neither approved vaccine nor specific drugs available to treat this disease. In this study, previously developed 19 human monoclonal antibodies (HuMAbs) showing strong to moderate cross neutralizing activity were selected. Most of them (13/19) were targeted to domain II of envelop glycoprotein. To understand and clarify the recognition properties, the maturation mechanisms comprising Variable/Diversity/Joining (VDJ) recombination, Variable Heavy (VH)/Variable Light (VL) chain pairing, variability at junctional site, and somatic hypermutation (SHM) of those antibodies were studied and compared with their predecessor germline sequences. IMGT/V-QUEST database was applied to analyze the isolated VH and VL sequences. To confirm the correction of isolated VH/VL, 3 HuMAbs (1A10H7, 1B3B9, 1G7C2) was transiently expressed in HEK293T cell. All three clones of the expressed recombinant IgG (rIgG) showed the same binding and neutralizing activity as same as those from hybridomas. The data obtained in this study will elucidate the properties of those HuMAbs for further genetic modification, and its binding epitopes.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-neutralizing; Dengue virus; Germline; Neutralization; Recombinant IgG
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24637211 PMCID: PMC7092929 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun ISSN: 0006-291X Impact factor: 3.575
Primers used to amplify Variable Heavy chain, and Variable Light chain (kappa and lambda).
| Name | Sequence | |
|---|---|---|
| hIGHV1/7- | ATGGACTGGACCTGGAGGATCCTC | 24 |
| hIGHV2 | ATGGACATACTTTGTTCCACGCTCCT | 26 |
| hIGHV4 | ATGAAACACCTGTGGTTCTTCCTCCT | 26 |
| hIGHV6 | ATGTCTGTCTCCTTCCTCATCTTCCT | 26 |
| hIGHV3 | ATGGAGTTTGGGCTGAGCTGGGTT | 24 |
| hIGHV5 | ATGGGGTCAACCGCCATCCTCGC | 23 |
| 37, hIgG1234(−)_PCR Center | CTCCCGCGGCTTTGTCTTGGCATTA | 25 |
| 17,hIgG1234(−)_nPCR | CCTTGGTGTTGCTGGGCTTGTGAT | 24 |
| IGKV1–5′L | ATGGACATGAGGGTCCCCGCTCAG | 24 |
| IGKV2–5′L | ATGAGGCTCCCTGCTCAGCTCCTG | 24 |
| IGKV3–5′L | ATGGAARCCCCAGCGCAGCTTCTC | 24 |
| IGKV4–5′L | ATGGTGTTGCAGACCCAGGTCTTCAT | 26 |
| IGKV5–5′L | ATGGGGTCCCAGGTTCACCTCCTC | 24 |
| 18, hIgK_PCR(−) | GTGACACTCTCCTGGGAGTTACCC | 24 |
| 11, Human specific 3′ primer for nested PCR | GAGTTACCCGATTGGAGGGCGTTAT | 25 |
| IGLV_1/3/5/7–5′L | ATGGCCTGGWYYCCTCTCYTYCTS | 24 |
| IGLV_8–5′L | ATGGCCTGGATGATGCTTCTCCTCG | 25 |
| IGLV_2/9/10–5′L | ATGSCCTGGGCTCYKCTSCTCCTS | 24 |
| IGLV_4–5′L | ATGGCCTGGRYCYCMYTCYWCCTM | 24 |
| 19, hIgL_nPCR(−) | TGGCAGCTGTAGCTTCTGTGGGACT | 25 |
Analysis of anti-DENV HuMAbs including its germline sequences, and immunogenetic data.
| HuMAbs | IGHV gene | IGKV/IGLV gene | No. of aa mutations /Identity(% variation) | HCDR3 aa sequence (length) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VH | VL | ||||
| 1A10H7 | HV1–69∗01F | KV1-NL1∗01 F | 12 /85(12.4) | 9/85 (9.6) | ARSRYYYDSDASNYGMDV (18) |
| 1G7C2 | HV1–69∗01F | LV2–23∗01 F | 17/80(19.5) | 11/85 (11.5) | ATLIAVAGSEGAGSFDI (17) |
| 1E7B8 | HV1–69∗01F | KV3–11∗01 F | 17 /81(17.3) | 4/90 (4.2) | ARHRAVAGGDSDHDENNWFGP (21) |
| 2D1G5 | HV1–69∗01F | LV2–11∗01 F | 14 /84(14.3) | 11/86 (11.3) | ARAGPIAATGVQYEMDV (17) |
| 1H5A11 | HV3–23∗01F | LV1–47∗02 F | 12 /84(12.5) | 5/93 (5.1) | ATGSQWPGDY (10) |
| 3A10G12 | HV3–23∗01F | LV1–47∗02 F | 10 /87(10.3) | 5/93 (5.1) | AAGSQWPGDY (10) |
| 4A6F9 | HV3–23∗01F | KV1–12∗01 F | 6 /91(6.2) | 4/90 (4.2) | ANTLWTVGSKGGFDY (15) |
| 4D10E9 | HV3–23∗01F | KV1–12∗01 F | 21 /76(21.6) | 12/82 (12.8) | TKIDWSIRGTFDN (13) |
| 4F5E1 | HV3–23∗01F | KV4–1∗01 F | 6 /92(6.1) | 5/96 (5) | ARVTGGWSDY(10) |
| 1B3B9 | HV7–4∗02F | LV7–43∗01 F | 14 /83(14.4) | 13/83 (13.5) | TTLSGYSADWPEDY (14) |
| 4H12C8 | HV7–4∗02F | LV7–43∗01 F | 5 /92(5.1) | 3/93 (3.1) | TTLSGYSADWPEDY (14) |
| 5E6B1 | HV7–4∗02F | LV7–43∗01 F | 13 /84(13.4) | 13/83 (13.5) | TTLSGYSADWPEDY (14) |
| 1C2D2 | HV4–59∗01F | KV1–33∗01 F | 13 /84(13.4) | 10/84 (10.6) | ARVAKLFGSATYGMDV (16) |
| 5G8E3 | HV3–30∗04F | LV1–40∗01 F | 12 /86(12.2) | 12/87 (12.1) | AVYYCARRGDYSSSAENFQH (20) |
| 1C1G4 | HV1–18∗01F | LV1–47∗02 F | 9 /89(9.2) | 6/92 (6.1) | ARGPDYESSDSPWFDY (16) |
| 3A1E2 | HV3–11∗01F | LV1–40∗01 F | 17 /80(19.5) | 9/90 (9.1) | ARGMTGFTTSNTESFDL (17) |
| 3B6C7 | HV4–39∗01F | LV7–43∗01 F | 15 /83(15.3) | 8/89 (8.2) | ASPGGLISDEAMAGYFDY (18) |
| 2H8G1 | HV3–30∗03F | KV1–39∗01 F | 13 /85(13.3) | 12/83 (12.6) | ATGGGRFSGSGNYYYYGMDV (20) |
| 5G2D2 | HV1–69∗06F | KV1-NL1∗01 F | 14 /83(14.4) | 6/88 (11.7) | ARSTYYYDGSDLTYGMDV (18) |
Fig. 1Germline usage frequencies. (A) The heavy chain variable (HV) germline sequences. (B) The light chain variable (kV for kappa and LV for lambda) germline sequences related to 19 cross-neutralizing anti-DENV HuMAbs derived from acute secondarily infected dengue patients. The Y axis represents the usage percentage of each germline sequences, as also indicated at the top of bar graph.
The amino acid sequences of heavy chain from 3 major groups, classified by type of heavy chain germline, of 13 HuMAbs in alignment of their predecessors germline, including type of its germline light chain and NT50. The CDRs and FR are located according to the immunogenetic annotation. The somatic mutations in the VH of each HuMAb are highlighted in gray color.
Fig. 2Fluorescence immunostaining of three expressed rIgG to Dengue virus serotype 2 compared with IgG from hybridoma secretion.
Fig. 3Neutralizing activity (NT) of HuMAb 1B3B9 to 4 serotypes of dengue virus (A–D), and 1A10H7 (E and F), 1G7C2 (G and H) to dengue virus serotype 2 and 3, demonstrated by the comparison of rIgG and IgG from hybridoma secretion.