Peter M Mullins1, Jesse M Pines2. 1. Department of Health Policy The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC. Electronic address: petermmullins@gmail.com. 2. Departments of Health Policy and Emergency Medicine The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored Hospital Compare data on emergency department (ED) crowding metrics to assess characteristics of reporting vs nonreporting hospitals, whether hospitals ranked as the US News Best Hospitals (2012-2013) vs unranked hospitals differed in ED performance and relationships between ED crowding and other reported hospital quality measures. METHODS: An ecological study was conducted using data from Hospital Compare data sets released March 2013 and from a popular press publication, US News Best Hospitals 2012 to 2013. We compared hospitals on 5 ED crowding measures: left-without-being-seen rates, waiting times, boarding times, and length of stay for admitted and discharged patients. RESULTS: Of 4810 hospitals included in the Hospital Compare sample, 2990 (62.2%) reported all ED 5 crowding measures. Median ED length of stay for admitted patients was 262 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 215-326), median boarding was 88 minutes (IQR, 60-128), median ED length of stay for discharged patients was 139 minutes (IQR, 114-168), and median waiting time was 30 minutes (IQR, 20-44). Hospitals ranked as US News Best Hospitals 2012 to 2013 (n=650) reported poorer performance on ED crowding measures than unranked hospitals (n=4160) across all measures. Emergency department boarding times were associated with readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (r=0.14, P<.001) and pneumonia (r=0.17, P<.001) as well as central line-associated bloodstream infections (r=0.37, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is great variation in measures of ED crowding across the United States. Emergency department crowding was related to several measures of in-patient quality, which suggests that ED crowding should be a hospital-wide priority for quality improvement efforts.
OBJECTIVES: We explored Hospital Compare data on emergency department (ED) crowding metrics to assess characteristics of reporting vs nonreporting hospitals, whether hospitals ranked as the US News Best Hospitals (2012-2013) vs unranked hospitals differed in ED performance and relationships between ED crowding and other reported hospital quality measures. METHODS: An ecological study was conducted using data from Hospital Compare data sets released March 2013 and from a popular press publication, US News Best Hospitals 2012 to 2013. We compared hospitals on 5 ED crowding measures: left-without-being-seen rates, waiting times, boarding times, and length of stay for admitted and discharged patients. RESULTS: Of 4810 hospitals included in the Hospital Compare sample, 2990 (62.2%) reported all ED 5 crowding measures. Median ED length of stay for admitted patients was 262 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 215-326), median boarding was 88 minutes (IQR, 60-128), median ED length of stay for discharged patients was 139 minutes (IQR, 114-168), and median waiting time was 30 minutes (IQR, 20-44). Hospitals ranked as US News Best Hospitals 2012 to 2013 (n=650) reported poorer performance on ED crowding measures than unranked hospitals (n=4160) across all measures. Emergency department boarding times were associated with readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (r=0.14, P<.001) and pneumonia (r=0.17, P<.001) as well as central line-associated bloodstream infections (r=0.37, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is great variation in measures of ED crowding across the United States. Emergency department crowding was related to several measures of in-patient quality, which suggests that ED crowding should be a hospital-wide priority for quality improvement efforts.
Authors: Ammar Siddiqui; Laura Belland; Laura Rivera-Reyes; Daniel Handel; Kabir Yadav; Kennon Heard; Amanda Eisenberg; Ula Hwang Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mahshid Abir; Jason Goldstick; Rosalie Malsberger; Sebastian Bauhoff; Claude M Setodji; Neil Wenger Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Scott M I Friedlander; Emily H Marr; Laurie A Mena; Ismael Corral; Ruey-Kang R Chang Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Alexander Kutz; Jonas Florin; Pierre Hausfater; Devendra Amin; Adina Amin; Sebastian Haubitz; Antoinette Conca; Barbara Reutlinger; Pauline Canavaggio; Gabrielle Sauvin; Maguy Bernard; Andreas Huber; Beat Mueller; Philipp Schuetz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah Compeau; Michael Howlett; Stephanie Matchett; Jennifer Shea; Jacqueline Fraser; Rose McCloskey; Paul Atkinson Journal: Cureus Date: 2016-10-06