A Modesto1, C Gandy2, E Mery3, T Filleron4, C Massabeau5, F Izar5, H Charitansky6, H Roché2, B de Lafontan5. 1. Département de radiothérapie, institut Claudius-Regaud, 20-24, rue du Pont-Saint-Pierre, 31000 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: Modesto.anouchka@claudiusregaud.fr. 2. Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Claudius-Regaud, 20-24, rue du Pont-Saint-Pierre, 31000 Toulouse, France. 3. Département d'anatomie pathologie, institut Claudius-Regaud, 20-24, rue du Pont-Saint-Pierre, 31000 Toulouse, France. 4. Département de statistiques médicales, institut Claudius-Regaud, 20-24, rue du Pont-Saint-Pierre, 31000 Toulouse, France. 5. Département de radiothérapie, institut Claudius-Regaud, 20-24, rue du Pont-Saint-Pierre, 31000 Toulouse, France. 6. Département de chirurgie, institut Claudius-Regaud, 20-24, rue du Pont-Saint-Pierre, 31000 Toulouse, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recent improvements in the detection of breast cancer at an early stage have resulted in a rising incidence of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. So far, there is no consensus regarding its optimal management. We hereby report on our 10-year single institutional experience in breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion including pathological reviewing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for a ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion at the Institut Claudius-Regaud (Toulouse, France) over a 10-year period were included in this study. We reviewed all available histological materials. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were eligible for this study. Two patients presented with a lymph node invasion at diagnosis. Each patient benefited from initial surgical management, which consisted either in mastectomy (n=25) or conservative resection (n=37). Axillary exploration was performed in 52 patients (82%). After a median follow-up of 61.3 months [46.9;69], the 5-year overall survival and disease free survival were 98.2 (95% CI=[88.2;99.7]) and 89.5% (95% CI=[76.3;95.6]) respectively. Two delayed invasive relapses occurred leading to one specific death. The pathological review highlighted a trend towards a loss of HR and HER2 expression (9%) in the microinvasive component in comparison with its surrounded in situ carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The risk of initial lymph node involvement and delayed invasive local relapse deserve an optimal locoregional management including lymph node evaluation. The non-negligible discrepancy's rate between in situ and microinvasive components justifies HR status and HER2 expression assessment on the microinvasive component.
PURPOSE: Recent improvements in the detection of breast cancer at an early stage have resulted in a rising incidence of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. So far, there is no consensus regarding its optimal management. We hereby report on our 10-year single institutional experience in breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion including pathological reviewing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for a ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion at the Institut Claudius-Regaud (Toulouse, France) over a 10-year period were included in this study. We reviewed all available histological materials. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were eligible for this study. Two patients presented with a lymph node invasion at diagnosis. Each patient benefited from initial surgical management, which consisted either in mastectomy (n=25) or conservative resection (n=37). Axillary exploration was performed in 52 patients (82%). After a median follow-up of 61.3 months [46.9;69], the 5-year overall survival and disease free survival were 98.2 (95% CI=[88.2;99.7]) and 89.5% (95% CI=[76.3;95.6]) respectively. Two delayed invasive relapses occurred leading to one specific death. The pathological review highlighted a trend towards a loss of HR and HER2 expression (9%) in the microinvasive component in comparison with its surrounded in situ carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The risk of initial lymph node involvement and delayed invasive local relapse deserve an optimal locoregional management including lymph node evaluation. The non-negligible discrepancy's rate between in situ and microinvasive components justifies HR status and HER2 expression assessment on the microinvasive component.