Lynn M Hoey1, Paul Fulbrook2, James A Douglas3. 1. Sleep Disorders Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: lynn.hoey.sp@gmail.com. 2. Nursing Research & Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine and Australia Catholic University, Brisbane. 3. Sleep Disorders Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sleep is a dynamic and essential part of human life and health. In healthcare settings, nurses are strategically placed to promote sleep and sleep health. In this regard, nursing actions should be based upon effective methods of assessment of patient sleep. Standardised sleep assessment does not currently occur in the care of acute hospitalised patients. Use of an appropriate measurement tool would help evaluate inpatient sleep. An effective, efficient sleep assessment tool is needed to aid clinicians. Such assessment would enable specific nursing intervention to be tailored to individual patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to examine the literature on sleep measurement to identify subjective sleep assessment tools that may be suitable for routine use with hospitalised patients, and to evaluate their reliability and validity. METHOD: A review of existing literature was undertaken to identify and evaluate subjective sleep measurement tools. RESULTS: The initial literature searches identified 402 articles, of which ten met the criteria for review. These reported on three subjective sleep measurement scales: the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire; the St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire; and the Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire is brief and easy to use. In specific samples, its items correlate with domains reflecting sleep quality and has shown excellent internal consistency. Equivocal results and scoring challenges were found with the St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire. The Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale captured sleep disturbance and total sleep time, but time-to-complete is more burdensome than the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The current use of sleep assessment instruments in the acute hospital setting is restricted mainly to research activities. Of the three tools identified that could be used clinically to measure inpatient sleep, and although it was developed for use in the intensive care setting, the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire held greatest potential due to its ease and rapidity of use. However, it has yet to be validated for use with general hospital inpatients, and further research is required in this area.
BACKGROUND: Sleep is a dynamic and essential part of human life and health. In healthcare settings, nurses are strategically placed to promote sleep and sleep health. In this regard, nursing actions should be based upon effective methods of assessment of patient sleep. Standardised sleep assessment does not currently occur in the care of acute hospitalised patients. Use of an appropriate measurement tool would help evaluate inpatient sleep. An effective, efficient sleep assessment tool is needed to aid clinicians. Such assessment would enable specific nursing intervention to be tailored to individual patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to examine the literature on sleep measurement to identify subjective sleep assessment tools that may be suitable for routine use with hospitalised patients, and to evaluate their reliability and validity. METHOD: A review of existing literature was undertaken to identify and evaluate subjective sleep measurement tools. RESULTS: The initial literature searches identified 402 articles, of which ten met the criteria for review. These reported on three subjective sleep measurement scales: the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire; the St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire; and the Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire is brief and easy to use. In specific samples, its items correlate with domains reflecting sleep quality and has shown excellent internal consistency. Equivocal results and scoring challenges were found with the St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire. The Verran Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale captured sleep disturbance and total sleep time, but time-to-complete is more burdensome than the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The current use of sleep assessment instruments in the acute hospital setting is restricted mainly to research activities. Of the three tools identified that could be used clinically to measure inpatient sleep, and although it was developed for use in the intensive care setting, the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire held greatest potential due to its ease and rapidity of use. However, it has yet to be validated for use with general hospital inpatients, and further research is required in this area.
Authors: Sapna R Kudchadkar; Othman Aljohani; Jordan Johns; Andrew Leroux; Eman Alsafi; Ebaa Jastaniah; Allan Gottschalk; Nehal J Shata; Ahmad Al-Harbi; Daniel Gergen; Anisha Nadkarni; Ciprian Crainiceanu Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Marco Fabbri; Alessia Beracci; Monica Martoni; Debora Meneo; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mariana Alvina Dos Santos; Ana Paula da Conceição; Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini; Marcia Aparecida Ciol; Margareth McLean Heithkemper; Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2018-11-14
Authors: Fernanda de Souza Machado; Regina Claudia da Silva Souza; Vanessa Brito Poveda; Ana Lucia Siqueira Costa Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2017-09-12