Literature DB >> 24636428

Faecal transplantation for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a review.

V L McCune1, J K Struthers2, P M Hawkey3.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a major healthcare burden despite recent global falls in its prevalence. The risk of recurrence is high when using antibiotics such as vancomycin, particularly in already recurrent disease. In light of this, new therapy options are being perused, including novel antibiotics such as fidaxomicin, probiotics, intravenous immunoglobulin and faecal transplantation. Faecal transplantation, referred to here as human probiotic infusion (HPI), is attracting an increasing amount of interest from physicians and patients. Its use has been documented in ca. 500 cases for the treatment of CDI, with overall efficacy rates reported to be ca. 91%. The first randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that HPI was superior to a 14-day course of vancomycin (89% vs. 31%; P<0.001) and reported no deaths or serious adverse events. Safety and patient acceptability are often cited as limitations to the widespread use of this technique. However, data suggest that the short-term safety profile is encouraging, and concerns over patient acceptability are not warranted in the majority of cases. It seems appropriate to treat an infection which is caused by a major disturbance in the gut microbiota with a treatment that reverses this disturbance, rather than antibiotics that may exacerbate the problem. However, to fully understand the role of HPI in the management of CDI, further RCTs are needed with comparator antibiotics such as fidaxomicin and to establish the most efficacious HPI protocol for administration and preparation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteriotherapy; Clostridium difficile; Faecal microbiota transplant; Faecal transplant; Human probiotic infusion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24636428     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  6 in total

1.  Economic assessment of fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in special populations (patients with cancer, concomitant antibiotic treatment or renal impairment) in Spain.

Authors:  C Rubio-Terrés; J Cobo Reinoso; S Grau Cerrato; J Mensa Pueyo; M Salavert Lletí; A Toledo; P Anguita; D Rubio-Rodríguez; M Watt; R Gani
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Agent-based model of fecal microbial transplant effect on bile acid metabolism on suppressing Clostridium difficile infection: an example of agent-based modeling of intestinal bacterial infection.

Authors:  Xavier Peer; Gary An
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection treated with home fecal transplantation: a case report.

Authors:  Pauline S Duke; John Fardy
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-28

4.  Fecal Transplantation using a Nasoenteric Tube during an Initial Episode of Severe Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Yong Duk Jeon; Namki Hong; Jung Ho Kim; Se Hee Park; Sung Bae Kim; In Ji Song; Hea Won Ann; Jin Young Ahn; Sun Bean Kim; Nam Su Ku; Kyungwon Lee; Dongeun Yong; June Myung Kim; Jun Yong Choi
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  DNA-Microarray-based Genotyping of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Darius Gawlik; Peter Slickers; Ines Engelmann; Elke Müller; Christian Lück; Anette Friedrichs; Ralf Ehricht; Stefan Monecke
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: An official clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy (SEQ), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the working group of Postoperative Infection of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation (SEDAR).

Authors:  E Bouza; J M Aguado; L Alcalá; B Almirante; P Alonso-Fernández; M Borges; J Cobo; J Guardiola; J P Horcajada; E Maseda; J Mensa; N Merchante; P Muñoz; J L Pérez Sáenz; M Pujol; E Reigadas; M Salavert; J Barberán
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.553

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.