Literature DB >> 24636167

123s and ABCs: developmental shifts in logarithmic-to-linear responding reflect fluency with sequence values.

Michelle Hurst1, K Leigh Monahan, Elizabeth Heller, Sara Cordes.   

Abstract

When placing numbers along a number line with endpoints 0 and 1000, children generally space numbers logarithmically until around the age of 7, when they shift to a predominantly linear pattern of responding. This developmental shift of responding on the number placement task has been argued to be indicative of a shift in the format of the underlying representation of number (Siegler & Opfer, ). In the current study, we provide evidence from both child and adult participants to suggest that performance on the number placement task may not reflect the structure of the mental number line, but instead is a function of the fluency (i.e. ease) with which the individual can work with the values in the sequence. In Experiment 1, adult participants respond logarithmically when placing numbers on a line with less familiar anchors (1639 to 2897), despite linear responding on control tasks with standard anchors involving a similar range (0 to 1287) and a similar numerical magnitude (2000 to 3000). In Experiment 2, we show a similar developmental shift in childhood from logarithmic to linear responding for a non-numerical sequence with no inherent magnitude (the alphabet). In conclusion, we argue that the developmental trend towards linear behavior on the number line task is a product of successful strategy use and mental fluency with the values of the sequence, resulting from familiarity with endpoints and increased knowledge about general ordering principles of the sequence.A video abstract of this article can be viewed at:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zg5Q2LIFk3M.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24636167     DOI: 10.1111/desc.12165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  9 in total

1.  How feedback improves children's numerical estimation.

Authors:  Hilary Barth; Emily Slusser; Shipra Kanjlia; Jennifer Garcia; Jessica Taggart; Elizabeth Chase
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  An integration of competing accounts on children's number line estimation.

Authors:  Tanja Dackermann; Stefan Huber; Julia Bahnmueller; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  Evaluation of a Computer-Based Training Program for Enhancing Arithmetic Skills and Spatial Number Representation in Primary School Children.

Authors:  Larissa Rauscher; Juliane Kohn; Tanja Käser; Verena Mayer; Karin Kucian; Ursina McCaskey; Günter Esser; Michael von Aster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-27

5.  Are Books Like Number Lines? Children Spontaneously Encode Spatial-Numeric Relationships in a Novel Spatial Estimation Task.

Authors:  Clarissa A Thompson; Bradley J Morris; Pooja G Sidney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-21

6.  Use of feedback to improve mental number line representations in primary care clinics.

Authors:  Rachel F Eyler; Sara Cordes; Benjamin R Szymanski; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Number Representations Drive Number-Line Estimates.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Richard Prather; Kelly S Mix; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2019-10-28

8.  The Use of Local and Global Ordering Strategies in Number Line Estimation in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Jaccoline E Van 't Noordende; M J M Volman; Paul P M Leseman; Korbinian Moeller; Tanja Dackermann; Evelyn H Kroesbergen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-18

9.  Spatial complexity facilitates ordinal mapping with a novel symbol set.

Authors:  Christine Podwysocki; Robert A Reeve; Jacob M Paul; Jason D Forte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.