Theodore K Malmstrom1, Douglas K Miller, John E Morley. 1. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine how well the interview-based, clinic-friendly International Academy of Nutrition and Aging (FRAIL) frailty scale predicts future disability and mortality in the African American Health (AAH) cohort compared with the clinic-friendly Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) frailty scale, the phenotype-based Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty scale, and the comprehensive Frailty Index (FI). DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Metropolitan St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: African American Health is a population-based panel study of African Americans (baseline age 49-65) from St. Louis, Missouri. Participants completed in-home assessments at baseline (N = 998) and 3- (n = 853) and 9- (n = 582) year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL difficulties at 3 and 9 years and 9-year mortality. Frailty measures included the FRAIL, SOF, and CHS scales and the FI. RESULTS: The FRAIL, SOF, CHS, and FI measures predicted new 3- and 9-year disability, and the FRAIL and FI scales predicted 9-year mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) contrasts showed that the FRAIL scale performed as well as (9-year disability and mortality) or better than (3-year disability) the CHS and SOF scales and the FI better than the FRAIL, CHS, and SOF scales for all outcomes except the FRAIL and CHS scales for 9-year ADL difficulties. The CHS and SOF scales were equivalent for all outcomes in ROC contrasts. CONCLUSION: Overall the FI and the FRAIL scale exhibited the strongest predictive validity for disability and mortality in AAH. The best prediction tool to identify frail individuals at risk of disability and mortality may be one that includes a comorbidity measure. The FRAIL scale includes a comorbidity item and is a brief interview-based measure that is easy to administer, score, and interpret. The FRAIL scale has demonstrated validity and may prove to be a valuable scale for use by clinicians.
OBJECTIVES: To determine how well the interview-based, clinic-friendly International Academy of Nutrition and Aging (FRAIL) frailty scale predicts future disability and mortality in the African American Health (AAH) cohort compared with the clinic-friendly Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) frailty scale, the phenotype-based Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty scale, and the comprehensive Frailty Index (FI). DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Metropolitan St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: African American Health is a population-based panel study of African Americans (baseline age 49-65) from St. Louis, Missouri. Participants completed in-home assessments at baseline (N = 998) and 3- (n = 853) and 9- (n = 582) year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL difficulties at 3 and 9 years and 9-year mortality. Frailty measures included the FRAIL, SOF, and CHS scales and the FI. RESULTS: The FRAIL, SOF, CHS, and FI measures predicted new 3- and 9-year disability, and the FRAIL and FI scales predicted 9-year mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) contrasts showed that the FRAIL scale performed as well as (9-year disability and mortality) or better than (3-year disability) the CHS and SOF scales and the FI better than the FRAIL, CHS, and SOF scales for all outcomes except the FRAIL and CHS scales for 9-year ADL difficulties. The CHS and SOF scales were equivalent for all outcomes in ROC contrasts. CONCLUSION: Overall the FI and the FRAIL scale exhibited the strongest predictive validity for disability and mortality in AAH. The best prediction tool to identify frail individuals at risk of disability and mortality may be one that includes a comorbidity measure. The FRAIL scale includes a comorbidity item and is a brief interview-based measure that is easy to administer, score, and interpret. The FRAIL scale has demonstrated validity and may prove to be a valuable scale for use by clinicians.
Authors: Joan Vermeulen; Jacques C L Neyens; Erik van Rossum; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Luc P de Witte Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Abdelouahid Tajar; Matthew D L O'Connell; Arnold B Mitnitski; Terence W O'Neill; Samuel D Searle; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Joseph D Finn; György Bartfai; Steven Boonen; Felipe F Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S Han; Krzysztof Kula; Fernand Labrie; Michael E J Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Alan J Silman; Dirk Vanderschueren; Kenneth Rockwood; Frederick C W Wu Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robbert J J Gobbens; Marcel A L M van Assen; Katrien G Luijkx; Maria Th Wijnen-Sponselee; Jos M G A Schols Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2010-05-08 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Holly Syddall; Helen C Roberts; Maria Evandrou; Cyrus Cooper; Howard Bergman; Avan Aihie Sayer Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Susan K Ewing; Brent C Taylor; Howard A Fink; Peggy M Cawthon; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Jane A Cauley; Marc C Hochberg; Nicolas Rodondi; J Kathleen Tracy; Steven R Cummings Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-02-25
Authors: James E Graham; Soham Al Snih; Ivonne M Berges; Laura A Ray; Kyriakos S Markides; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Gerontology Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Susan K Ewing; Peggy M Cawthon; Howard A Fink; Brent C Taylor; Jane A Cauley; Thuy-Tien Dam; Lynn M Marshall; Eric S Orwoll; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-02-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: T Doi; H Makizako; K Tsutsumimoto; R Hotta; S Nakakubo; K Makino; T Suzuki; H Shimada Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Simon J G Richards; Frank A Frizelle; John A Geddes; Tim W Eglinton; Mark B Hampton Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Nicholas M Pajewski; Jeff D Williamson; William B Applegate; Dan R Berlowitz; Linda P Bolin; Glenn M Chertow; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Nieves Lopez-Barrera; James R Powell; Christianne L Roumie; Carolyn Still; Kaycee M Sink; Rocky Tang; Clinton B Wright; Mark A Supiano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 6.053