Literature DB >> 24635544

Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.

Roberto S Pessoa1, Fábio J B Bezerra, Ravel M Sousa, Jos Vander Sloten, Marcio Zaffalon Casati, Siegfried V N Jaecques.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not yet well understood to what extent different implant-abutment mismatch sizes and implant-abutment connection types may influence the peri-implant biomechanical environment of implants in different clinical situations.
METHODS: Computed tomography-based finite element models comprising a maxillary central incisor socket and 4.5 × 13 mm outer-diameter implants with external and internal hex connection types were constructed. The abutments were designed with diameters of 3.5 mm (platform switching [PS] with 1 mm of diametral mismatch [PS - 1]), 4.0 mm (PS with 0.5 mm of diametral mismatch [PS - 0.5]), and 4.5 mm (conventional matching implant-abutment design [CD]). Analysis of variance at the 95% confidence interval was used to evaluate peak equivalent strain (EQV strain) in the bone, bone volume affected by a strain >4,000 με (EQV strain >4,000 με), the peak von Mises stress (EQV stress) in abutment screw, and the bone-implant relative displacement.
RESULTS: Similar bone strain levels (EQV strain and EQV strain >4,000 με) were encountered in PS - 1, PS - 0.5, and CD models for immediately placed implants, independent of the connection type. For immediately loaded implants, slightly smaller peak EQV strain and EQV strain >4,000 με were found for PS - 1. However, for both connection types in osseointegrated models, the higher the mismatch size, the lesser the amount of strain found.
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in mismatch size of PS configuration results in a significant decrease of strain levels in bone for osseointegrated implants, principally for external hex connections. No significant effect of PS could be noted in immediately placed implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; dental implant, abutment design; dental implants; finite element analysis; immediate dental implant loading; tensile strength

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24635544     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2014.130633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  5 in total

1.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant.

Authors:  Se-Young Moon; Young-Jun Lim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Platform switching vs standard implants in partially edentulous patients using the Dental Tech Implant System: clinical and radiological results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Massimo Del Fabbro; Carlo Bianchessi; Riccardo Del Lupo; Luca Landi; Silvio Taschieri; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Peri-implant marginal bone loss reduction with platform-switching components: 5-Year post-loading results of an equivalence randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ana Messias; Salomão Rocha; Wilfried Wagner; Jörg Wiltfang; Maximilian Moergel; Eleonore Behrens; Pedro Nicolau; Fernando Guerra
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Direct resin composite restoration of endodontically-treated permanent molars in adolescents: bite force and patient-specific finite element analysis.

Authors:  Monise de Paula Rodrigues; Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares; Márcio Alex Barros Gomes; Renata Afonso Pereira; Daranee Tantbirojn; Antheunis Versluis; Carlos Jose Soares
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Salomão Rocha; Wilfried Wagner; Jörg Wiltfang; Pedro Nicolau; Maximilian Moergel; Ana Messias; Eleonore Behrens; Fernando Guerra
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 8.728

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.