Literature DB >> 24634604

A Source Apportionment of U.S. Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution.

George D Thurston1, Kazuhiko Ito1, Ramona Lall1.   

Abstract

Using daily fine particulate matter (PM2.5) composition data from the 2000-2005 U.S. EPA Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) for over 200 sites, we applied multivariate methods to identify and quantify the major fine particulate matter (PM2.5) source components in the U.S. Novel aspects of this work were: (1) the application of factor analysis (FA) to multi-city daily data, drawing upon both spatial and temporal variations of chemical species; and, (2) the exclusion of secondary components (sulfates, nitrates and organic carbon) from the source identification FA to more clearly discern and apportion the PM2.5 mass to primary emission source categories. For the quantification of source-related mass, we considered two approaches based upon the FA results: 1) using single key tracers for sources identified by FA in a mass regression; and, 2) applying Absolute Principal Component Analysis (APCA). In each case, we followed a two-stage mass regression approach, in which secondary components were first apportioned among the identified sources, and then mass was apportioned to the sources and to other secondary mass not explained by the individual sources. The major U.S. PM2.5 source categories identified via FA (and their key elements) were: Metals Industry (Pb, Zn); Crustal/Soil Particles (Ca, Si); Motor Vehicle Traffic (EC, NO2); Steel Industry (Fe, Mn); Coal Combustion (As, Se); Oil Combustion (V, Ni); Salt Particles (Na, Cl) and Biomass Burning (K). Nationwide spatial plots of the source-related PM2.5 impacts were confirmatory of the factor interpretations: ubiquitous sources, such as Traffic and Soil, were found to be spread across the nation, more unique sources (such as Steel and Metals Processing) being highest in select industrialized cities, Biomass Burning was highest in the U.S. Northwest, while Residual Oil combustion was highest in cities in the Northeastern U.S. and in cities with major seaports. The sum of these source contributions and the secondary PM2.5 components agreed well with the U.S. PM2.5 observed during the study period (mean=14.3 ug/m3; R2= 0.91). Apportionment regression analyses using single-element tracers for each source category gave results consistent with the APCA estimates. Comparisons of nearby sites indicated that the PM2.5 mass and the secondary aerosols were most homogenous spatially, while traffic PM2.5 and its tracer, EC, were among the most spatially representative of the source-related components. Comparison of apportionment results to a previous analysis of the 1979-1982 IP Network revealed similar and correlated major U.S. source category factors, albeit at lower levels than in the earlier period, suggesting a consistency in the U.S. spatial patterns of these source-related exposures over time, as well. These results indicate that applying source apportionment methods to the nationwide CSN can be an informative avenue for identifying and quantifying source components for the subsequent estimation of source-specific health effects, potentially contributing to more efficient regulation of PM2.5.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute Principal Component Analysis (APCA); Chemical Speciation Network (CSN); Source Apportionment; fine particulate matter mass (PM2.5)

Year:  2011        PMID: 24634604      PMCID: PMC3951912          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  18 in total

1.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 at an urban IMPROVE site in Seattle, Washington.

Authors:  Naydene N Maykut; Joellen Lewtas; Eugene Kim; Timothy V Larson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Sources of fine urban particulate matter in Detroit, MI.

Authors:  Amy E Gildemeister; Philip K Hopke; Eugene Kim
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Phoenix, AZ, using positive matrix factorization.

Authors:  Steven G Brown; Anna Frankel; Sean M Raffuse; Paul T Roberts; Hilary R Hafner; Darcy J Anderson
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Fine particulate matter source apportionment for the Chemical speciation Trends Network site at Birmingham, Alabama, using Positive Matrix Factorization.

Authors:  Karsten Baumann; R K M Jayanty; James B Flanagan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Source apportionment of PM(2.5) and selected hazardous air pollutants in Seattle.

Authors:  Chang-fu Wu; Timothy V Larson; Szu-Ying Wu; John Williamson; Hal H Westberg; L-J Sally Liu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Associations between 1980 U.S. mortality rates and alternative measures of airborne particle concentration.

Authors:  H Ozkaynak; G D Thurston
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; Kazuhiko Ito; George D Thurston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; George D Thurston; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; John J Godleski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Spatial and temporal variation in PM(2.5) chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Francesca Dominici; Keita Ebisu; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  36 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo toxicity of urban and rural particulate matter from California.

Authors:  Jaime E Mirowsky; Lan Jin; George Thurston; David Lighthall; Tim Tyner; Lori Horton; Karen Galdanes; Steven Chillrud; James Ross; Kent E Pinkerton; Lung Chi Chen; Morton Lippmann; Terry Gordon
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Source apportionment of particulate matter in a large city of southeastern Po Valley (Bologna, Italy).

Authors:  L Tositti; E Brattich; M Masiol; D Baldacci; D Ceccato; S Parmeggiani; M Stracquadanio; S Zappoli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Recent Approaches to Estimate Associations Between Source-Specific Air Pollution and Health.

Authors:  Jenna R Krall; Matthew J Strickland
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

4.  Comparison of trace elements in size-fractionated particles in two communities with contrasting socioeconomic status in Houston, TX.

Authors:  Inkyu Han; Yuncan Guo; Masoud Afshar; Thomas H Stock; Elaine Symanski
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Chemical fractionation and health risk assessment of particulate matter-bound metals in Pune, India.

Authors:  Rohi Jan; Ritwika Roy; Suman Yadav; P Gursumeeran Satsangi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Trace element contents in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in urban school microenvironments near a contaminated beach with mine tailings, Chañaral, Chile.

Authors:  Stephanie Mesías Monsalve; Leonardo Martínez; Karla Yohannessen Vásquez; Sergio Alvarado Orellana; José Klarián Vergara; Miguel Martín Mateo; Rogelio Costilla Salazar; Mauricio Fuentes Alburquenque; Dante D Cáceres Lillo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  In vitro inhalation/ingestion bioaccessibility, health risks, and source appointment of airborne particle-bound elements trapped in room air conditioner filters.

Authors:  Xin Hu; Xuebin Xu; Zhuhong Ding; Yijun Chen; Hong-Zhen Lian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Effectiveness of a portable air cleaner in removing aerosol particles in homes close to highways.

Authors:  Jennie Cox; Kelechi Isiugo; Patrick Ryan; Sergey A Grinshpun; Michael Yermakov; Colleen Desmond; Roman Jandarov; Stephen Vesper; James Ross; Steven Chillrud; Karen Dannemiller; Tiina Reponen
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.770

9.  Using a latent variable model with non-constant factor loadings to examine PM2.5 constituents related to secondary inorganic aerosols.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Zhang; Marie S O'Neill; Brisa N Sánchez
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2016-03-27       Impact factor: 2.039

10.  Trace elements and nitrogen content in naturally growing moss Hypnum cupressiforme in urban and peri-urban forests of the Municipality of Ljubljana (Slovenia).

Authors:  S Berisha; M Skudnik; U Vilhar; M Sabovljević; S Zavadlav; Z Jeran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.