Literature DB >> 24634470

The Health Technology Assessment of companion diagnostics: experience of NICE.

Sarah K Byron1, Nick Crabb, Elisabeth George, Mirella Marlow, Adrian Newland.   

Abstract

Companion diagnostics are used to aid clinical decision making to identify patients who are most likely to respond to treatment. They are becoming increasingly important as more new pharmaceuticals receive licensed indications that require the use of a companion diagnostic to identify the appropriate patient subgroup for treatment. These pharmaceuticals have proven benefit in the treatment of some cancers and other diseases, and also have potential to precisely tailor treatments to the individual in the future. However, the increasing use of companion diagnostics could place a substantial burden on health system resources to provide potentially high volumes of testing. This situation, in part, has led policy makers and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies to review the policies and methods used to make reimbursement decisions for pharmaceuticals requiring companion diagnostics. The assessment of a pharmaceutical alongside the companion diagnostic used in the clinical trials may be relatively straightforward, although there are a number of challenges associated with assessing pharmaceuticals where a range of alternative companion diagnostics are available for use in routine clinical practice. The UK HTA body, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), has developed policy for considering companion diagnostics using its Technology Appraisal and Diagnostics Assessment Programs. Some HTA bodies in other countries have also adapted their policies and methods to accommodate the assessment of companion diagnostics. Here, we provide insight into the HTA of companion diagnostics for reimbursement decisions and how the associated challenges are being addressed, in particular by NICE. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, "The Precision Medicine Conundrum: Approaches to Companion Diagnostic Co-development." ©2014 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24634470     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

Review 1.  Developing precision medicine in a global world.

Authors:  Eric H Rubin; Jeffrey D Allen; Jan A Nowak; Susan E Bates
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The economic case for precision medicine.

Authors:  Sean P Gavan; Alexander J Thompson; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2018-01-08

Review 3.  How are Companion Diagnostics Considered in Economic Evaluations of Oncology Treatments? A Review of Health Technology Assessments.

Authors:  Melissa Gomez Montero; Houcine El Alili; Mahmoud Hashim; Peter Wigfield; Mariya Dimova; Ralph Riley; Katie Pascoe
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 4.  Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing challenges and current developments.

Authors:  Fatiha H Shabaruddin; Nigel D Fleeman; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2015-06-24

5.  The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  James Love-Koh; Alison Peel; Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla; Kate Ennis; Rosemary Lovett; Andrea Manca; Anastasia Chalkidou; Hannah Wood; Matthew Taylor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.