Literature DB >> 24634447

The benefit of synthetic versus biological patch augmentation in the repair of posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears: a 3-year follow-up study.

Pietro Ciampi1, Celeste Scotti, Alessandro Nonis, Matteo Vitali, Clelia Di Serio, Giuseppe M Peretti, Gianfranco Fraschini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff repair typically results in a satisfactory, although variable, clinical outcome. However, anatomic failure of the repaired tendon often occurs. HYPOTHESIS: Patch augmentation can improve the results of open rotator cuff repair by supporting the healing process, protecting the suture, and reducing friction in the subacromial space. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 152 patients with a posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear were treated by open repair only (control group; n = 51; mean age, 67.06 ± 4.42 years), open repair together with collagen patch augmentation (collagen group; n = 49; mean age, 66.53 ± 5.17 years), or open repair together with polypropylene patch augmentation (polypropylene group; n = 52; mean age, 66.17 ± 5.44 years) and were retrospectively studied. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and after 36 months with a visual analog scale (VAS) and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale and by measuring elevation of the scapular plane and strength with a dynamometer. The VAS and UCLA scores were also obtained 2 months postoperatively. Tendon integrity was assessed after 1 year by ultrasound. Patients were homogeneous as per the preoperative assessment.
RESULTS: After 2 months, results (mean ± standard deviation) for the control, collagen, and polypropylene groups, respectively, were as follows: VAS scores were 6.96 ± 1.11, 6.46 ± 1.02, and 4.92 ± 0.90, while UCLA scores were 11.29 ± 1.46, 11.40 ± 1.51, and 19.15 ± 1.99. After 36 months, the mean scores for the respective groups were 3.66 ± 1.05, 4.06 ± 1.02, and 3.28 ± 1.10 for the VAS and 14.88 ± 1.98, 14.69 ± 1.99, and 24.61 ± 3.22 for the UCLA scale. In addition, after 36 months, elevation on the scapular plane was 140.68° ± 9.84°, 140.61° ± 12.48°, and 174.71° ± 8.18°, and abduction strength was 8.73 ± 0.54 kg, 9.03 ± 0.60 kg, and 13.79 ± 0.64 kg for the control, collagen, and polypropylene groups, respectively. The retear rate after 12 months was 41% (21/51) for the control group, 51% (25/49) for the collagen group, and 17% (9/52) for the polypropylene group. In particular, the reduced 12-month retear rate and the increased UCLA scores, abduction strength, and elevation at 3-year follow-up were statistically significant for patients treated with a polypropylene patch compared with those treated with repair only or with a collagen patch.
CONCLUSION: Polypropylene patch augmentation of rotator cuff repair was demonstrated to significantly improve the 36-month outcome in terms of function, strength, and retear rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmentation; open repair; patch; rotator cuff tear

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24634447     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514525592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  42 in total

Review 1.  [Patch augmentation of the rotator cuff. A reasonable choice or a waste of money?].

Authors:  M Flury
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Management of complications after rotator cuff surgery.

Authors:  Stephen A Parada; Matthew F Dilisio; Colin D Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Patch Augmentation in Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-10

4.  Preliminary Results of a Consecutive Series of Large & Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Treated with Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Augmented with Extracellular Matrix.

Authors:  Paolo Consigliere; Ioannis Polyzois; Tanaya Sarkhel; Rohit Gupta; Ofer Levy; A Ali Narvani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

5.  The Rotator Cuff Organ: Integrating Developmental Biology, Tissue Engineering, and Surgical Considerations to Treat Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Thierry Pauyo; Richard E Debski; Mark W Rodosky; Rocky S Tuan; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Graft Augmentation of Fascia Lata for Large and Massive Tears.

Authors:  Takeshi Kokubu; Yutaka Mifune; Atsuyuki Inui; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 7.  Graft use in the treatment of large and massive rotator cuff tears: an overview of techniques and modes of failure with MRI correlation.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; Dayne T Mickelson; Barrett A Little; Thomas W Hash; Devin B Lemmex; Alison P Toth; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Maximilian Petri; Joshua A Greenspoon; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-30

9.  Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Mathew Baldwin; Cushla Cooper; Navraj S Nagra; Joanna C Crocker; Molly Glaze; Gemma Greenall; Amar Rangan; Lucksy Kottam; Jonathan L Rees; Dair Farrar-Hockley; Naomi Merritt; Sally Hopewell; David Beard; Michael Thomas; Melina Dritsaki; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 10.  Biologic and Synthetic Grafts in the Reconstruction of Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Robert J Gillespie; Derrick M Knapik; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.