OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between gestational weight gain (GWG) exceeding Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines and neonatal adiposity in the five North American field centers of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome study. METHODS: GWG was categorized as less than, within, or greater than 2009 IOM guidelines. Birthweight, body fat percentage, cord serum C-peptide, and sum of neonatal flank, subscapular, and triceps skin fold thicknesses were dichotomized as >90th percentile or ≤90th percentile obtained by quantile regression. Logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Of the 5297 participants, 11.6% gained less, 31.9% gained within, and 56.5% gained more than the recommendation. With adjustment for glucose tolerance levels, normal and overweight women who gained more than the recommendation had increased odds of delivering infants with sum of skin folds >90th percentile (OR = 1.75 and 4.77, respectively) and percentage body fat >90th percentile (OR = 2.41 and 2.59, respectively), and normal weight and obese women who gained more than the recommendation had increased odds of delivering infants with birthweight >90th percentile (OR = 2.80 and 1.93, respectively) compared to women who gained within the recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed independent associations between exceeding IOM GWG recommendations and neonatal adiposity in normal and overweight women, controlling for glucose tolerance levels.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between gestational weight gain (GWG) exceeding Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines and neonatal adiposity in the five North American field centers of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome study. METHODS: GWG was categorized as less than, within, or greater than 2009 IOM guidelines. Birthweight, body fat percentage, cord serum C-peptide, and sum of neonatal flank, subscapular, and triceps skin fold thicknesses were dichotomized as >90th percentile or ≤90th percentile obtained by quantile regression. Logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: Of the 5297 participants, 11.6% gained less, 31.9% gained within, and 56.5% gained more than the recommendation. With adjustment for glucose tolerance levels, normal and overweight women who gained more than the recommendation had increased odds of delivering infants with sum of skin folds >90th percentile (OR = 1.75 and 4.77, respectively) and percentage body fat >90th percentile (OR = 2.41 and 2.59, respectively), and normal weight and obesewomen who gained more than the recommendation had increased odds of delivering infants with birthweight >90th percentile (OR = 2.80 and 1.93, respectively) compared to women who gained within the recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed independent associations between exceeding IOM GWG recommendations and neonatal adiposity in normal and overweight women, controlling for glucose tolerance levels.
Authors: Sarah R Crozier; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper; Nicolas C Harvey; Zoë A Cole; Siân M Robinson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lynn P Lowe; Boyd E Metzger; Alan R Dyer; Julia Lowe; David R McCance; Terence R J Lappin; Elisabeth R Trimble; Donald R Coustan; David R Hadden; Moshe Hod; Jeremy J N Oats; Bengt Persson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: L C Houghton; W A Ester; L H Lumey; K B Michels; Y Wei; B A Cohn; E Susser; M B Terry Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Maisa N Feghali; Kaleab Z Abebe; Diane M Comer; Steve Caritis; Janet M Catov; Christina M Scifres Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Eva C Diaz; Mario A Cleves; Marisha DiCarlo; Sarah R Sobik; Meghan L Ruebel; Keshari M Thakali; Clark R Sims; Nafisa K Dajani; Rebecca A Krukowski; Elisabet Børsheim; Thomas M Badger; Kartik Shankar; Aline Andres Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Elizabeth M Widen; Natalie Burns; Michael Daniels; Grant Backlund; Rachel Rickman; Saralyn Foster; Amy R Nichols; Lori A Hoepner; Eliza W Kinsey; Judyth Ramirez-Carvey; Abeer Hassoun; Frederica P Perera; Radek Bukowski; Andrew G Rundle Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Michelle A Kominiarek; George Saade; Lisa Mele; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Line Rode; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Zoya Gridneva; Alethea Rea; Anna R Hepworth; Leigh C Ward; Ching T Lai; Peter E Hartmann; Donna T Geddes Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie L Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Cheryce L Harrison; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Hanne Hegaard; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede Journal: BMC Med Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 8.775