Literature DB >> 24633443

Straw- and slurry-associated prokaryotic communities differ during co-fermentation of straw and swine manure.

Jiabao Li1, Junpeng Rui, Zhaojun Pei, Xiaori Sun, Shiheng Zhang, Zhiying Yan, Yuanpeng Wang, Xiaofeng Liu, Tao Zheng, Xiangzhen Li.   

Abstract

Anaerobic co-fermentation of straw and manure is widely used for waste treatment and biogas production. However, the differences between the straw- and slurry-associated prokaryotic communities, their dynamic changes throughout the co-fermentation process, and their correlations with bioreactor performance are not fully understood. To address these questions, we investigated the prokaryotic community compositions and the dynamics of prokaryotes attached to the straw and in the slurry during co-fermentation of wheat straw and swine manure using pyrosequencing technique. The results showed that straw- and slurry-associated prokaryotes were different in their structure and function. Straw-associated prokaryotic communities were overrepresented by the phyla Spirochaetes and Fibrobacteres, while Synergistetes and Euryarchaeota were more abundant in the slurry. The straw-associated candidate class TG3, genera Fibrobacter, Bacteroides, Acetivibrio, Clostridium III, Papillibacter, Treponema, Sedimentibacter, and Lutispora may specialize in substrate hydrolysis. Propionate was the most abundant volatile fatty acid in the slurry, and it was probably degraded through syntrophic oxidation by the genera Pelotomaculum, Methanoculleus, and Methanosaeta. The protein-fermenting bacteria Aminobacterium and Cloacibacillus were much abundant in the slurry, indicating that proteins are important substrates in the co-fermentation. This study provided a better understanding of the anaerobic co-fermentation process that is driven by spatially differentiated microbiota.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24633443     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5629-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

1.  Differences of methanogenesis between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by hydrogen addition.

Authors:  Xianpu Zhu; Liumeng Chen; Yichao Chen; Qin Cao; Xiaofeng Liu; Dong Li
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Prolonged acetogenic phase and biological succession during anaerobic digestion using swine manure.

Authors:  Rafaella Costa Bonugli-Santos; Tiago Joelzer Marteres; Franciele Natividade Luiz; Juliana Gaio Somer; Ângelo Gabriel Mari; Michel Rodrigo Zambrano Passarini
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2-bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid.

Authors:  Tara M Webster; Adam L Smith; Raghav R Reddy; Ameet J Pinto; Kim F Hayes; Lutgarde Raskin
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Microbial Community Shifts during Biogas Production from Biowaste and/or Propionate.

Authors:  Chaoran Li; Christoph Moertelmaier; Josef Winter; Claudia Gallert
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-09

5.  Coexistence and competition of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in an anaerobic hexadecane-degrading culture.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Ma; Lai-Yan Liu; Jun-Peng Rui; Quan Yuan; Ding-Shan Feng; Zheng Zhou; Li-Rong Dai; Wan-Qiu Zeng; Hui Zhang; Lei Cheng
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Bacterial communities and metabolic activity of faecal cultures from equol producer and non-producer menopausal women under treatment with soy isoflavones.

Authors:  Lucía Guadamuro; Anja B Dohrmann; Christoph C Tebbe; Baltasar Mayo; Susana Delgado
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Response of Microbial Community to Induced Failure of Anaerobic Digesters Through Overloading With Propionic Acid Followed by Process Recovery.

Authors:  Azin Khafipour; Elsie M Jordaan; Daniel Flores-Orozco; Ehsan Khafipour; David B Levin; Richard Sparling; Nazim Cicek
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure.

Authors:  Li Sun; Phillip B Pope; Vincent G H Eijsink; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.813

9.  The core populations and co-occurrence patterns of prokaryotic communities in household biogas digesters.

Authors:  Junpeng Rui; Jiabao Li; Shiheng Zhang; Xuefeng Yan; Yuanpeng Wang; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Substrate Type and Free Ammonia Determine Bacterial Community Structure in Full-Scale Mesophilic Anaerobic Digesters Treating Cattle or Swine Manure.

Authors:  Jiabao Li; Junpeng Rui; Minjie Yao; Shiheng Zhang; Xuefeng Yan; Yuanpeng Wang; Zhiying Yan; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.