Literature DB >> 24633383

[Prospective assessment of quality of life after auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene].

J M Hempel1, D Knöbl, A Berghaus, T Braun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microtia is associated with increased psychosocial morbidity. The literature contains three purely retrospective studies using validated tools. These studies show that auricular reconstruction leads to a significant improvement in health-related quality of life in affected children and adults.
METHODS: In a prospective approach, the authors assessed 21 consecutive microtia patients (return rate 81 %; 7 children and 10 adults) before and after auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene using the following validated questionnaires: Glasgow Health Status Inventory (GHSI), Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), Childhood Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ) and Kidscreen-52.
RESULTS: An improved health-related quality of life was detected with all applied instruments.
CONCLUSION: A subjective benefit of auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene can be shown using prospective, as well retrospective tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24633383     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2833-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  18 in total

1.  Psychometric validation of the youth quality of life-facial differences questionnaire in patients following ear reconstruction with rib cartilage in microtia.

Authors:  Armin Steffen; Ralph Magritz; Henning Frenzel; Todd Edwards; Ralf Siegert
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  [Implants for reconstructive surgery of the nose and ear].

Authors:  A Berghaus
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Aesthetic microtia reconstruction with Medpor.

Authors:  Thomas Romo; Shari D Reitzen
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure.

Authors:  D Fischer; A L Stewart; D A Bloch; K Lorig; D Laurent; H Holman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients.

Authors:  Nigel Horlock; Esther Vögelin; Eileen T Bradbury; Adriaan O Grobbelaar; David T Gault
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: outcome and patient benefit in 65 children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; Sonja Gratza; Sven Becker; Ilona Schwentner; Klaus Stelter; Martin Patscheider; Alexander Berghaus; John Martin Hempel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Auricular reconstruction: an update.

Authors:  Gregory Renner; Robert V Lane
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Social and psychological effects of craniofacial deformity and surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  M J Pertschuk; L A Whitaker
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap.

Authors:  John F Reinisch; Sheryl Lewin
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.446

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Ear Conditions: The EAR-Q.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Natasha M Longmire; Neil W Bulstrode; David M Fisher; Leila Kasrai; Justine O'Hara; Vivek Panchapakesan; Andrea L Pusic; Ken Stewart; Elena Tsangaris; Natalia Ziolkowski; Karen W Y Wong Riff
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.