Literature DB >> 24632629

Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes.

Fatma Abouelenien1, Yuzaburo Namba2, Maria R Kosseva3, Naomichi Nishio2, Yutaka Nakashimada2.   

Abstract

The potential for methane production from semi-solid chicken manure (CM) and mixture of agricultural wastes (AWS) in a co-digestion process has been experimentally evaluated at thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures. To the best of author(')s knowledge, it is the first time that CM is co-digested with mixture of AWS consisting of coconut waste, cassava waste, and coffee grounds. Two types of anaerobic digestion processes (AD process) were used, process 1 (P1) using fresh CM (FCM) and process 2 (P2) using treated CM (TCM), ammonia stripped CM, were conducted. Methane production in P1 was increased by 93% and 50% compared to control (no AWS added) with maximum methane production of 502 and 506 mL g(-1)VS obtained at 55°C and 35°C, respectively. Additionally, 42% increase in methane production was observed with maximum volume of 695 mL g(-1)VS comparing P2 test with P2 control under 55°C. Ammonia accumulation was reduced by 39% and 32% in P1 and P2 tests.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural waste; Chicken manure; Co-digestion; Methane production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24632629     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  8 in total

1.  Effluent composition prediction of a two-stage anaerobic digestion process: machine learning and stoichiometry techniques.

Authors:  Luz Alejo; John Atkinson; Víctor Guzmán-Fierro; Marlene Roeckel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio.

Authors:  Liuying Song; Dunjie Li; Hongli Fang; Xiangyunong Cao; Rutao Liu; Qigui Niu; Yu-You Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Structural and metabolic adaptation of cellulolytic microcosm in co-digested Napier grass-swine manure and its application in enhancing thermophilic biogas production.

Authors:  Sarunyou Wongwilaiwalin; Wuttichai Mhuantong; Verawat Champreda; Sithichoke Tangphatsornruang; Pornpan Panichnumsin; Khanok Ratanakhanokchai; Chakrit Tachaapaikoon
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Process performance and methane production optimizing of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and corn straw.

Authors:  Chunlan Mao; Tong Zhang; Xiaojiao Wang; Yongzhong Feng; Guangxin Ren; Gaihe Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Modeling and Multiresponse Optimization for Anaerobic Codigestion of Oil Refinery Wastewater and Chicken Manure by Using Artificial Neural Network and the Taguchi Method.

Authors:  Esmaeil Mehryar; Weimin Ding; Abbas Hemmat; Muhammad Hassan; Zahir Talha; Jalal Kafashan; Hongying Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates.

Authors:  Congguang Zhang; Fei Wang; Mengfu Pei; Ling Qiu; Hong Qiang; Yiqing Yao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Processing High-Solid and High-Ammonia Rich Manures in a Two-Stage (Liquid-Solid) Low-Temperature Anaerobic Digestion Process: Start-Up and Operating Strategies.

Authors:  Prativa Mahato; Bernard Goyette; Md Saifur Rahaman; Rajinikanth Rajagopal
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25

8.  Optimization of Biomethane Production via Fermentation of Chicken Manure Using Marine Sediment: A Modeling Approach Using Response Surface Methodology.

Authors:  Fatma Abouelenien; Toyokazu Miura; Yutaka Nakashimada; Nooran S Elleboudy; Mohammad S Al-Harbi; Esmat F Ali; Mustafa Shukry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.