Literature DB >> 24632444

Network analysis reveals roles of inflammatory factors in different phenotypes of kidney transplant patients.

Duojiao Wu1, Xiaoping Liu2, Chen Liu3, Zhiping Liu2, Ming Xu1, Ruiming Rong1, Mengjia Qian1, Luonan Chen4, Tongyu Zhu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systems-level characterization of inflammation in kidney transplantation remains incomplete. By stratifying kidney transplant patients based on phenotypes, the present study sought to identify the role of inflammatory proteins in disease progress and assess potential biomarkers for allograft monitoring.
METHODS: Kidney transplant patients with different allograft status were enrolled in the study: stable renal function (ST), impaired renal function (UNST), acute rejection (AR), and chronic rejection (CR). We stratified the patients into 3 phenotype levels according to their symptoms and pathogenesis. Serum protein concentrations were measured by a quantitative protein array. All differentially expressed proteins were analyzed by protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs) to highlight protein interactions in patients with the above dysfunction levels. We identified level-related proteins and evaluated the classification efficiency of these biomarkers based on leave-one-out validation. The candidate proteins related to phenotype transforming were annotated by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis.
RESULTS: Based on the hypothesis that common proteins and their up- or down-regulation promote disease progress, we obtained 12 common proteins and 11 level-specific proteins from the phenotype-related PPINs. The common proteins were annotated for KEGG enrichment: (1) cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction; (2) hematopoietic cell lineage; (3) Jak-STAT signaling pathway; (4) allograft rejection; and (5) T cell receptor signaling pathway. The level-specific proteins could be potential biomarkers with diagnostic value. The classification potency of the 11 level-specific proteins (IL-1R-1, IL-16, TIMP-1, G-CSF, MIG, IL-11, BLC, TNF-β, Eotaxin-2, I-309 and IL-6 sR) was better than the performance using all 40 proteins.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the potential value of PPINs-based approach to understanding inflammation-derived mechanisms and developing diagnostic biomarkers. Independent evaluations are required to further estimate the clinical relevance of the new diagnostic biomarkers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Immune rejection; Inflammation; Kidney transplantation; Protein–protein interaction network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24632444     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  6 in total

Review 1.  Proteomics for rejection diagnosis in renal transplant patients: Where are we now?

Authors:  Wilfried Gwinner; Jochen Metzger; Holger Husi; David Marx
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

Review 2.  Fighting against kidney diseases with small interfering RNA: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Cheng Yang; Chao Zhang; Zitong Zhao; Tongyu Zhu; Bin Yang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 3.  From protein-protein interactions to protein co-expression networks: a new perspective to evaluate large-scale proteomic data.

Authors:  Danila Vella; Italo Zoppis; Giancarlo Mauri; Pierluigi Mauri; Dario Di Silvestre
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2017-03-20

4.  Sarcodon imbricatus polysaccharides improve mouse hematopoietic function after cyclophosphamide-induced damage via G-CSF mediated JAK2/STAT3 pathway.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Qiubo Chu; Xue Jiang; Yue Yu; Libian Wang; Yaqi Cui; Jiahui Lu; Lirong Teng; Di Wang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  A New Strategy for Analyzing Time-Series Data Using Dynamic Networks: Identifying Prospective Biomarkers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Jun Zeng; Lina Zhou; Chunxiu Hu; Peiyuan Yin; Xiaohui Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A porcine model to study the effect of brain death on kidney genomic responses.

Authors:  Mitchell B Sally; Darren J Malinoski; Frank P Zaldivar; Tony Le; Matin Khoshnevis; William A Pinette; Michael Hutchens; Shlomit Radom-Aizik
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-10-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.