Literature DB >> 24631862

Characterizing EPR-mediated passive drug targeting using contrast-enhanced functional ultrasound imaging.

Benjamin Theek1, Felix Gremse1, Sijumon Kunjachan1, Stanley Fokong1, Robert Pola2, Michal Pechar2, Roel Deckers3, Gert Storm4, Josef Ehling1, Fabian Kiessling1, Twan Lammers5.   

Abstract

The Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect is extensively used in drug delivery research. Taking into account that EPR is a highly variable phenomenon, we have here set out to evaluate if contrast-enhanced functional ultrasound (ceUS) imaging can be employed to characterize EPR-mediated passive drug targeting to tumors. Using standard fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) and two different protocols for hybrid computed tomography-fluorescence molecular tomography (CT-FMT), the tumor accumulation of a ~10 nm-sized near-infrared-fluorophore-labeled polymeric drug carrier (pHPMA-Dy750) was evaluated in CT26 tumor-bearing mice. In the same set of animals, two different ceUS techniques (2D MIOT and 3D B-mode imaging) were employed to assess tumor vascularization. Subsequently, the degree of tumor vascularization was correlated with the degree of EPR-mediated drug targeting. Depending on the optical imaging protocol used, the tumor accumulation of the polymeric drug carrier ranged from 5 to 12% of the injected dose. The degree of tumor vascularization, determined using ceUS, varied from 4 to 11%. For both hybrid CT-FMT protocols, a good correlation between the degree of tumor vascularization and the degree of tumor accumulation was observed, within the case of reconstructed CT-FMT, correlation coefficients of ~0.8 and p-values of <0.02. These findings indicate that ceUS can be used to characterize and predict EPR, and potentially also to pre-select patients likely to respond to passively tumor-targeted nanomedicine treatments.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Drug targeting; EPR; HPMA; Nanomedicine; Theranostics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631862      PMCID: PMC4031451          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  47 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound microbubbles for molecular diagnosis, therapy, and theranostics.

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Stanley Fokong; Patrick Koczera; Wiltrud Lederle; Twan Lammers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Nanotheranostics for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Simona Mura; Patrick Couvreur
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  The emerging nanomedicine landscape.

Authors:  Volker Wagner; Anwyn Dullaart; Anne-Katrin Bock; Axel Zweck
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery.

Authors:  Monty Liong; Jie Lu; Michael Kovochich; Tian Xia; Stefan G Ruehm; Andre E Nel; Fuyuhiko Tamanoi; Jeffrey I Zink
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Synthesis and characterization of HE-24.8: a polymeric contrast agent for magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Melanie Heilmann; Twan Lammers; Karel Ulbrich; Vladimir Subr; Peter Peschke; Bjoern Waengler; Walter Mier; Hans-Herrmann Schrenk; Michael Bock; Lothar Schad; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 7.  Anticancer nanomedicine and tumor vascular permeability; Where is the missing link?

Authors:  Sebastien Taurin; Hayley Nehoff; Khaled Greish
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 8.  Drug targeting to tumors: principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress.

Authors:  Twan Lammers; Fabian Kiessling; Wim E Hennink; Gert Storm
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 9.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs.

Authors:  Y Matsumura; H Maeda
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  33 in total

1.  The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Mukaddes Izci; Christy Maksoudian; Bella B Manshian; Stefaan J Soenen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses.

Authors:  Susanne K Golombek; Jan-Niklas May; Benjamin Theek; Lia Appold; Natascha Drude; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Nanotechnology: Future of Oncotherapy.

Authors:  Kshipra M Gharpure; Sherry Y Wu; Chun Li; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Multi-modal characterization of vasculature and nanoparticle accumulation in five tumor xenograft models.

Authors:  Einar Sulheim; Jana Kim; Annemieke van Wamel; Eugene Kim; Sofie Snipstad; Igor Vidic; Ingeborg Hovde Grimstad; Marius Widerøe; Sverre H Torp; Steinar Lundgren; David J Waxman; Catharina de Lange Davies
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Biodegradable fluorescent nanoparticles for endoscopic detection of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Stephan Rogalla; Krzysztof Flisikowski; Dimitris Gorpas; Aaron T Mayer; Tatiana Flisikowska; Michael J Mandella; Xiaopeng Ma; Kerriann M Casey; Stephen A Felt; Dieter Saur; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Angelika Schnieke; Christopher H Contag; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Stefan Harmsen
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 18.808

6.  Rethinking cancer nanotheranostics.

Authors:  Hongmin Chen; Weizhong Zhang; Guizhi Zhu; Jin Xie; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 66.308

7.  Tailoring the lipid composition of nanoparticles modulates their cellular uptake and affects the viability of triple negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Hanan Abumanhal-Masarweh; Dana da Silva; Maria Poley; Assaf Zinger; Evgenya Goldman; Nitzan Krinsky; Ron Kleiner; Gal Shenbach; Josh E Schroeder; Jeny Shklover; Janna Shainsky-Roitman; Avi Schroeder
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Sodium bicarbonate nanoparticles modulate the tumor pH and enhance the cellular uptake of doxorubicin.

Authors:  Hanan Abumanhal-Masarweh; Lilach Koren; Assaf Zinger; Zvi Yaari; Nitzan Krinsky; Galoz Kaneti; Nitsan Dahan; Yael Lupu-Haber; Edith Suss-Toby; Esther Weiss-Messer; Michal Schlesinger-Laufer; Janna Shainsky-Roitman; Avi Schroeder
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  GPU-Accelerated Adjoint Algorithmic Differentiation.

Authors:  Felix Gremse; Andreas Höfter; Lukas Razik; Fabian Kiessling; Uwe Naumann
Journal:  Comput Phys Commun       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.390

10.  Sonoporation enhances liposome accumulation and penetration in tumors with low EPR.

Authors:  Benjamin Theek; Maike Baues; Tarun Ojha; Diana Möckel; Seena Koyadan Veettil; Julia Steitz; Louis van Bloois; Gert Storm; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.