Literature DB >> 24631776

Efficacy of drug detection by fully-trained police dogs varies by breed, training level, type of drug and search environment.

Tadeusz Jezierski1, Ewa Adamkiewicz2, Marta Walczak2, Magdalena Sobczyńska2, Aleksandra Górecka-Bruzda2, John Ensminger3, Eugene Papet4.   

Abstract

Some recent publications claim that the effectiveness of police canine drug detection is uncertain and likely minimal, and that the deterrent effect of dogs on drug users is low. It is also claimed that more scientific evidence is needed to demonstrate to what extent dogs actually detect drugs. The aim of this research was to assess experimentally, but in actual training and testing environments used by the Polish police, how effective dogs trained by the police were at illicit substance detection depending on factors such as type of drug, dog breed, dog experience with the searching site, and drug odor residuals. 68 Labrador retrievers, 61 German shepherds, 25 Terriers and 10 English Cocker Spaniels, of both sexes in each breed, were used. Altogether 1219 experimental searching tests were conducted. On average, hidden drug samples were indicated by dogs after 64s searching time, with 87.7% indications being correct and 5.3% being false. In 7.0% of trials dogs failed to find the drug sample within 10min. The ranking of drugs from the easiest to the most difficult to detect was: marijuana, hashish, amphetamine, cocaine, heroin. German shepherds were superior to other breeds in giving correct indications while Terriers showed relatively poor detection performance. Dogs were equally efficient at searching in well-known vs. unknown rooms with strange (i.e., non-target novelty) odors (83.2% correct indications), but they were less accurate when searching outside or inside cars (63.5% and 57.9% correct indications respectively). During police examination trials the dogs made more false alerts, fewer correct indications and searching time was longer compared to the final stage of the training. The drug odor may persist at a site for at least 48h. Our experiments do not confirm the recent reports, based on drug users' opinions, of low drug detection efficiency. Usefulness of drug detection dogs has been demonstrated here, even if their effectiveness may not be 100%, but different factors have to be taken into consideration to assure maximum effectiveness.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dogs; Drug detection; Efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631776     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  17 in total

1.  An investigation on the olfactory capabilities of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).

Authors:  Elodie Ferrando; Christoph D Dahl
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Effects of Intranasal and Oral Bordetella bronchiseptica Vaccination on the Behavioral and Olfactory Capabilities of Detection Dogs.

Authors:  Amanda Collins; Rachel A Bear; Amritha Mallikarjun; Sarah A Kane; Jennifer L Essler; Patricia Kaynaroglu; Rebecca Feuer; Jordan G Smith; Cynthia M Otto
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 3.  Enhancing the Selection and Performance of Working Dogs.

Authors:  Emily E Bray; Cynthia M Otto; Monique A R Udell; Nathaniel J Hall; Angie M Johnston; Evan L MacLean
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Strategies Used by Pet Dogs for Solving Olfaction-Based Problems at Various Distances.

Authors:  Zita Polgár; Ádám Miklósi; Márta Gácsi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Test of Canine Olfactory Capacity: Comparing Various Dog Breeds and Wolves in a Natural Detection Task.

Authors:  Zita Polgár; Mari Kinnunen; Dóra Újváry; Ádám Miklósi; Márta Gácsi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rigorous Training of Dogs Leads to High Accuracy in Human Scent Matching-To-Sample Performance.

Authors:  Sophie Marchal; Olivier Bregeras; Didier Puaux; Rémi Gervais; Barbara Ferry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Characterizing the Smell of Marijuana by Odor Impact of Volatile Compounds: An Application of Simultaneous Chemical and Sensory Analysis.

Authors:  Somchai Rice; Jacek A Koziel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Biomimetic Sniffing Improves the Detection Performance of a 3D Printed Nose of a Dog and a Commercial Trace Vapor Detector.

Authors:  Matthew E Staymates; William A MacCrehan; Jessica L Staymates; Roderick R Kunz; Thomas Mendum; Ta-Hsuan Ong; Geoffrey Geurtsen; Greg J Gillen; Brent A Craven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  When the Nose Doesn't Know: Canine Olfactory Function Associated With Health, Management, and Potential Links to Microbiota.

Authors:  Eileen K Jenkins; Mallory T DeChant; Erin B Perry
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-29

10.  You Are Not My Handler! Impact of Changing Handlers on Dogs' Behaviours and Detection Performance.

Authors:  La Toya J Jamieson; Greg S Baxter; Peter J Murray
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.