Literature DB >> 24631467

Higher quality of molecular testing, an unfulfilled priority: Results from external quality assessment for KRAS mutation testing in colorectal cancer.

Lien Tembuyser1, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg2, Nicola Normanno3, Sofie Delen1, J Han van Krieken2, Elisabeth M C Dequeker4.   

Abstract

Precision medicine is now a key element in clinical oncology. RAS mutational status is a crucial predictor of responsiveness to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in metastatic colorectal cancer. In an effort to guarantee high-quality testing services in molecular pathology, the European Society of Pathology has been organizing an annual KRAS external quality assessment program since 2009. In 2012, 10 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, of which 8 from invasive metastatic colorectal cancer tissue and 2 artificial samples of cell line material, were sent to more than 100 laboratories from 26 countries with a request for routine KRAS testing. Both genotyping and clinical reports were assessed independently. Twenty-seven percent of the participants genotyped at least 1 of 10 samples incorrectly. In total, less than 5% of the distributed specimens were genotyped incorrectly. Genotyping errors consisted of false negatives, false positives, and incorrectly genotyped mutations. Twenty percent of the laboratories reported a technical error for one or more samples. A review of the written reports showed that several essential elements were missing, most notably a clinical interpretation of the test result, the method sensitivity, and the use of a reference sequence. External quality assessment serves as a valuable educational tool in assessing and improving molecular testing quality and is an important asset for monitoring quality assurance upon incorporation of new biomarkers in diagnostic services.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631467     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  17 in total

Review 1.  Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers.

Authors:  Lien Tembuyser; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Quality Assessment of Reporting Performance for EGFR Molecular Diagnosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yanxi Han; Rui Zhang; Guigao Lin; Kuo Zhang; Jiehong Xie; Jinming Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 3.  The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Clinical Evaluation of IntelliPlex™ KRAS G12/13 Mutation Kit for Detection of KRAS Mutations in Codon 12 and 13: A Novel Multiplex Approach.

Authors:  Chi-Long Chen; Chi-Kuan Chen; Chung-Liang Ho; Wei-Ming Chi; Chien-Hsuan Yeh; Shian-Pin Hu; Peter Friebe; Stuart Palmer; Chin-Shiou Huang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Quality assurance in clinical trials--the role of pathology.

Authors:  Christoph Röcken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Evaluation of tacrolimus-related CYP3A5 genotyping in China: Results from the First External Quality Assessment Exercise.

Authors:  Guigao Lin; Xiao Zhang; Kuo Zhang; Yanxi Han; Liming Tan; Jinming Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  External quality assessment unravels interlaboratory differences in quality of RAS testing for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Lien Tembuyser; Nicola Normanno; Sara Vander Borght; J Han van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-02-05

8.  Digitally guided microdissection aids somatic mutation detection in difficult to dissect tumors.

Authors:  Katherine Geiersbach; Nils Adey; Noah Welker; Danielle Elsberry; Elisabeth Malmberg; Sumie Edwards; Erinn Downs-Kelly; Mohamed Salama; Mary Bronner
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2015-12-15

9.  RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers.

Authors:  Annemarie Boleij; Bastiaan B J Tops; Paul D M Rombout; Elizabeth M Dequeker; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; J Han van Krieken
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20

Review 10.  Guidance for laboratories performing molecular pathology for cancer patients.

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Zandra Deans; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Anders Edsjö; Etienne Rouleau; Francesc Solé; Erik Thunnissen; Wim Timens; Ed Schuuring; Elisabeth Dequeker; Samuel Murray; Manfred Dietel; Patricia Groenen; J Han Van Krieken
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.