Literature DB >> 2463146

Influences of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of cutaneous and mixed nerves on subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials.

A Nardone1, M Schieppati.   

Abstract

Aim of this study was to assess whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) 'gates' somatosensory evoked potentials (EPs) peripherally or centrally, and which afferent fibres and sensory nuclei mediate this effect. The following waves were recorded after stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist or of the digital nerves of the index finger: N9, the cervical N11 and N13, the parietal P9, P11, P14, N18, N20, P22, P27, P40. When both median or digital nerve EPs were conditioned by TENS delivered to the median nerve, reduction in amplitude of N9, P14, N18 and later generated cortical waves was observed. To measure the central contribution to this decrease, unconditioned 'reference' EPs were evoked by stimulating with a current strength yielding an N9 potential of an amplitude equal to that obtained during TENS. In this case, the amplitude of P14, N18 and later cortical waves was significantly greater than during TENS. When both median or digital nerve EPs were conditioned by TENS delivered to the digital nerves, waves were only slightly affected. No effects were seen on the EPs elicited from the median or index finger digital nerves when TENS was administered to the contralateral median or digital nerves or to the ipsilateral middle finger. It is concluded that TENS gates the somatosensory volley, both at a peripheral level through a 'busy line-effect' on large afferent fibres, and centrally at the level of the cuneatus nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2463146     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90048-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  8 in total

1.  Mechanisms of pain relief by vibration and movement.

Authors:  R Kakigi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on central nervous system amplification of somatosensory input.

Authors:  E Urasaki; S Wada; H Yasukouchi; A Yokota
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Somatosensory perturbations influence cortical activity associated with single-limb balance performance.

Authors:  David A Sherman; Tim Lehmann; Jochen Baumeister; Dustin R Grooms; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Leica S Claydon; G Peter Herbison; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-09

5.  Increasing intensity of TENS prevents analgesic tolerance in rats.

Authors:  Karina L Sato; Luciana S Sanada; Barbara A Rakel; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 6.  Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Primary sensory and motor cortex excitability are co-modulated in response to peripheral electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Siobhan M Schabrun; Michael C Ridding; Mary P Galea; Paul W Hodges; Lucinda S Chipchase
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain: a protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.