Literature DB >> 24631353

Predicting all-cause and cause-specific mortality by static and dynamic measurements of allostatic load: a 10-year population-based cohort study in Taiwan.

An-Chun Hwang1, Li-Ning Peng1, Yu-Wen Wen2, Yi-Wen Tsai3, Li-Chuan Chang4, Shu-Ti Chiou5, Liang-Kung Chen6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of allostatic load (AL), either static or dynamic measurements, in predicting all-cause and cause-specific mortality of older people in Taiwan.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Population-based community study. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand twenty-three community-dwelling older people. MEASUREMENTS: Allostatic load (calculated by systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, insulin-like growth factor-1, 12-hour urine cortisol, 12-hour urine epinephrine, 12-hour urine norepinephrine, 12-hour urine dopamine, white blood cell count, neutrophils, interleukin-6, albumin, creatinine) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality from national death registry. INTERVENTION: None.
RESULTS: Adjusted for age and sex, each 1-point increase in AL score was associated with 20% incremental risk of mortality [hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.31]. This association can be extended to cause-specific mortality in both sexes in general. In addition, the higher AL score quintile was significantly associated with higher risk of 10-year all-cause mortality (P < .0001). This association was consistent across different cause-specific mortality (ie, malignant neoplasm (P = .008), cardiometabolic diseases (P < .0001), infectious diseases (P < .0001), respiratory diseases (P < .0001), and others (P = .0002), respectively. Compared with AL score decliners, adjusted for age, sex, and baseline AL score in 2000, participants with fast increase had significantly higher mortality (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.23-5.84, P = .01). The effect was stronger in men (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.1-7.29, P = .03 in slow increase; HR 4.06, 95% CI 1.56-10.6, P = .001 in fast increase group), but it was insignificant in female participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher AL score or rapid increase of AL score significantly increased subsequent mortality risk in older adults, either measured statically or dynamically. AL is predictive of 10-year mortality regardless of cause of death, and rapid increase in AL score is associated with higher subsequent mortality.
Copyright © 2014 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allostatic load; elderly; geriatrics; homeostasis; mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631353     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  23 in total

1.  Stress Measured by Allostatic Load Score Varies by Reason for Immigration: The Africans in America Study.

Authors:  Jean N Utumatwishima; Rafeal L Baker; Brianna A Bingham; Stephanie T Chung; David Berrigan; Anne E Sumner
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-04-25

2.  Allostatic load and the assessment of cumulative biological risk in biobehavioral medicine: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Linda C Gallo; Addie L Fortmann; Josiemer Mattei
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Vegetated land cover near residence is associated with reduced allostatic load and improved biomarkers of neuroendocrine, metabolic and immune functions.

Authors:  Andrey I Egorov; Shannon M Griffin; Reagan R Converse; Jennifer N Styles; Elizabeth A Sams; Anthony Wilson; Laura E Jackson; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Greater tree cover near residence is associated with reduced allostatic load in residents of central North Carolina.

Authors:  Andrey I Egorov; Shannon M Griffin; Reagan R Converse; Jennifer N Styles; Elizabeth Klein; James Scott; Elizabeth A Sams; Edward E Hudgens; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Going the distance: The diurnal range of cortisol and its association with cognitive and physiological functioning.

Authors:  Susan T Charles; Jacqueline Mogle; Jennifer R Piazza; Arun Karlamangla; David M Almeida
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.905

6.  Neighborhood socioeconomic context and change in allostatic load among older Puerto Ricans: The Boston Puerto Rican health study.

Authors:  Marcia P Jiménez; Theresa L Osypuk; Sandra Arevalo; Katherine L Tucker; Luis M Falcon
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 7.  More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science.

Authors:  Elissa S Epel; Alexandra D Crosswell; Stefanie E Mayer; Aric A Prather; George M Slavich; Eli Puterman; Wendy Berry Mendes
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 8.  Dynamics of biomarkers in relation to aging and mortality.

Authors:  Konstantin G Arbeev; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Anatoliy I Yashin
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.432

9.  Allostatic Load in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Mini Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Asha Mathew; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Hongjin Li; Min Kyeong Jang; Chang Gi Park; Ulf G Bronas
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.318

10.  Association between health behaviours and cardiometabolic dysregulation: a population-based survey among healthy adults in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Esther Yee Tak Yu; Caitlin Hon Ning Yeung; Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Eric Ho Man Tang; Carlos King Ho Wong; Bernard Man Yung Cheung; Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.