Literature DB >> 2463120

Two-site immunoenzymometric assay for the 52-kDa cathepsin D in cytosols of breast cancer tissues.

H Rogier1, G Freiss, M G Besse, G Cavalié-Barthez, M Garcia, B Pau, H Rochefort, F Paolucci.   

Abstract

We developed a solid-phase two-site immunoenzymometric assay (IEMA) of the estrogen-induced 52-kDa cathepsin D (EC 3.4.23.5) and its processed forms (48-kDa and 34-kDa proteins) in cytosols of breast cancer tissues, using two monoclonal antibodies directed against two different epitopes of these antigens. The first antibody is bound to a polystyrene microtiter well; the second is labeled with alkaline phosphatase. The assay involves a simultaneous incubation of the antigen with both antibodies, because we observed signal loss during sequential incubations. Alkaline phosphatase was chosen because other enzymes (peroxidase, beta-galactosidase) were inhibited by cytosol extraction buffers. The measurable range of 52-kDa-related proteins is from 0.3 to 6 nmol/L with precision (CVs) within and between runs of 3.9% and 15.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, accuracy, and rapid turnaround time of the two-site IEMA should facilitate the clinical evaluation of this new marker in oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2463120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Response to P.M. Ravdin (BCRT 24:219-226, 1993), "Evaluation of Cathepsin D as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer".

Authors:  H Rochefort; S Thorpe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Cathepsin D in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Rochefort
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemical and immunoradiometric detection methods.

Authors:  U J Göhring; A Scharl; U Thelen; A Ahr; G Crombach; B R Titius
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Evaluation of cathepsin D as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Tumour markers: An overview.

Authors:  T Malati
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2007-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.