Literature DB >> 24631078

Induction of protective immunity against H1N1 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 with spray-dried and electron-beam sterilised vaccines in non-human primates.

Regina Scherließ1, Ankur Ajmera2, Mike Dennis3, Miles W Carroll4, Jens Altrichter5, Nigel J Silman3, Martin Scholz6, Kristina Kemter5, Anthony C Marriott3.   

Abstract

Currently, the need for cooled storage and the impossibility of terminal sterilisation are major drawbacks in vaccine manufacturing and distribution. To overcome current restrictions a preclinical safety and efficacy study was conducted to evaluate new influenza A vaccine formulations regarding thermal resistance, resistance against irradiation-mediated damage and storage stability. We evaluated the efficacy of novel antigen stabilizing and protecting solutions (SPS) to protect influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 split virus antigen under experimental conditions in vitro and in vivo. Original or SPS re-buffered vaccine (Pandemrix) was spray-dried and terminally sterilised by irradiation with 25 kGy (e-beam). Antigen integrity was monitored by SDS-PAGE, dynamic light scattering, size exclusion chromatography and functional haemagglutination assays. In vitro screening experiments revealed a number of highly stable compositions containing glycyrrhizinic acid (GA) and/or chitosan. The most stable composition was selected for storage tests and in vivo assessment of seroconversion in non-human primates (Macaca fascicularis) using a prime-boost strategy. Redispersed formulations with original adjuvant were administered intramuscularly. Storage data revealed high stability of protected vaccines at 4°C and 25°C, 60% relative humidity, for at least three months. Animals receiving original Pandemrix exhibited expected levels of seroconversion after 21 days (prime) and 48 days (boost) as assessed by haemagglutination inhibition and microneutralisation assays. Animals vaccinated with spray-dried and irradiated Pandemrix failed to exhibit seroconversion after 21 days whereas spray-dried and irradiated, SPS-protected vaccines elicited similar seroconversion levels to those vaccinated with original Pandemrix. Boost immunisation with SPS-protected vaccine resulted in a strong increase in seroconversion but had only minor effects in animals treated with non SPS-protected vaccine. In conclusion, utilising the SPS formulation technology, spray-drying and terminal sterilisation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 split virus vaccine is feasible. Findings indicate the potential utility of such formulated vaccines e.g. for needle-free vaccination routes and delivery to countries with uncertain cold chain facilities.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dry powder vaccine; Excipients; Irradiation; Stabilising and protecting solution (SPS); Thermal stability; Viruses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631078     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  9 in total

1.  Annual World Vaccine Congress 2014: a re-evaluation of the value proposition for increasing vaccine thermostability.

Authors:  Roland Derwand
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The use of nonhuman primates in research on seasonal, pandemic and avian influenza, 1893-2014.

Authors:  A Sally Davis; Jeffery K Taubenberger; Mike Bray
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.970

3.  A Design of Experiment (DoE) approach to optimise spray drying process conditions for the production of trehalose/leucine formulations with application in pulmonary delivery.

Authors:  S Focaroli; P T Mah; J E Hastedt; I Gitlin; S Oscarson; J V Fahy; A M Healy
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 4.  Compounds with anti-influenza activity: present and future of strategies for the optimal treatment and management of influenza. Part II: Future compounds against influenza virus.

Authors:  R Gasparini; D Amicizia; P L Lai; N L Bragazzi; D Panatto
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2014-12

5.  Comparison of a novel microcrystalline tyrosine adjuvant with aluminium hydroxide for enhancing vaccination against seasonal influenza.

Authors:  M D Heath; N J Swan; A C Marriott; N J Silman; B Hallis; C Prevosto; K E Gooch; M A Skinner
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  Developments in the formulation and delivery of spray dried vaccines.

Authors:  Gaurav Kanojia; Rimko Ten Have; Peter C Soema; Henderik Frijlink; Jean-Pierre Amorij; Gideon Kersten
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Chitosan-based mucosal adjuvants: Sunrise on the ocean.

Authors:  Yufei Xia; Qingze Fan; Dongxia Hao; Jie Wu; Guanghui Ma; Zhiguo Su
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Ionizing Radiation Technologies for Vaccine Development - A Mini Review.

Authors:  Sohini S Bhatia; Suresh D Pillai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Influenza A Virus Challenge Models in Cynomolgus Macaques Using the Authentic Inhaled Aerosol and Intra-Nasal Routes of Infection.

Authors:  Anthony C Marriott; Mike Dennis; Jennifer A Kane; Karen E Gooch; Graham Hatch; Sally Sharpe; Claudia Prevosto; Gail Leeming; Elsa-Gayle Zekeng; Karl J Staples; Graham Hall; Kathryn A Ryan; Simon Bate; Nathifa Moyo; Catherine J Whittaker; Bassam Hallis; Nigel J Silman; Ajit Lalvani; Tom M Wilkinson; Julian A Hiscox; James P Stewart; Miles W Carroll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.