Literature DB >> 24630749

Vascular artifact mimicking thrombosis on MR imaging using ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in abdominal vascular assessment.

Ghaneh Fananapazir1, Daniele Marin2, Paul V Suhocki2, Charles Y Kim2, Mustafa R Bashir2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe an artifact that mimics thrombosis when assessing abdominal vasculature on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using ferumoxytol in patients with contraindications to gadolinium-based contrast agents and to evaluate factors that may contribute to this artifact.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists in consensus retrospectively evaluated 61 abdominal MR imaging examinations using ferumoxytol as an intravenous contrast agent for the presence of an observed artifact that can mimic thrombosis. Patient demographics and contrast agent bolus concentrations were compared with an unpaired Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: An artifact mimicking thrombosis was observed in 30 of 61 examinations, all on the arterial phase sequences. In examinations with this artifact, the average concentration of administered ferumoxytol was greater than in examinations where the artifact was not observed (P < .01). Several additional vascular findings were observed, including portal vein thrombosis (n = 2) and aneurysm (n = 1), renal vein thrombosis (n = 2), abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 1), abdominal and iliac artery dissection (n = 3), and sequelae of portal hypertension (n = 8).
CONCLUSIONS: Although MR imaging using ferumoxytol as an intravenous contrast agent can be useful in detecting abdominal vascular abnormalities, an artifact mimicking vascular thrombosis was observed in nearly half of the examinations.
Copyright © 2014 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24630749     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  8 in total

Review 1.  Safety and technique of ferumoxytol administration for MRI.

Authors:  Shreyas S Vasanawala; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Michael D Hope; Mellena D Bridges; Thomas A Hope; Scott B Reeder; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Crossover comparison of ferumoxytol and gadobenate dimeglumine for abdominal MR-angiography at 3.0 tesla: Effects of contrast bolus length and flip angle.

Authors:  Tilman Schubert; Utaroh Motosugi; Sonja Kinner; Timothy J Colgan; Samir D Sharma; Scott Hetzel; Shane Wells; Camilo A Campo; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Vascular applications of ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Andrew W Bowman; Cory R Gooch; Lauren F Alexander; Madhura A Desai; Candice W Bolan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-22

4.  MR Angiography of Renal Transplant Vasculature with Ferumoxytol:: Comparison of High-Resolution Steady-State and First-Pass Acquisitions.

Authors:  Michael T Corwin; Ghaneh Fananapazir; Abhijit J Chaudhari
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Ten Things You Might Not Know about Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Ferumoxytol magnetic resonance angiography: a dose-finding study in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Sokratis Stoumpos; Martin Hennessy; Alex T Vesey; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Ram Kasthuri; David B Kingsmore; Patrick B Mark; Giles Roditi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Vascular and plaque imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide.

Authors:  Shirjel R Alam; Colin Stirrat; Jennifer Richards; Saeed Mirsadraee; Scott I K Semple; George Tse; Peter Henriksen; David E Newby
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of potential kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Sokratis Stoumpos; Martin Hennessy; Alex T Vesey; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Ram Kasthuri; David B Kingsmore; Patrick B Mark; Giles Roditi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.