Literature DB >> 24629798

Significance of distraction osteogenesis of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton - a clinical review after 10 years of experience with the technique.

Nicolai Adolphs1, Nicole Ernst2, Horst Menneking2, Bodo Hoffmeister2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has been applied to the field of craniomaxillofacial surgery for more than two decades. Although relevant factors for successful distraction osteogenesis are well known there are ongoing controversies about indications and limitations of the method and there is still a lack of evidence based data. Since 2003 the principle of gradual lengthening has been applied to patients affected by different types of skeletal craniomaxillofacial deficiency within individualized treatment protocols at the Campus Virchow Klinikum - Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - by the same surgical team. The records of these patients were reviewed in order to assess the significance of the technique within the spectrum of a craniomaxillofacial department. During 10 years DO has been applied in 80 patients representing less than 1% of all patients that have been treated since 2003. Review of the protocols showed a heterogeneous group with a wide variance of parameters, the age ranging from 2½ to 51 years. Internal distraction devices were used in all cases and individually selected with respect to optimal stability during active distraction and consolidation phase. Although distraction related complications occurred the majority of procedures ended up with the favoured result and skeletal stability. However additional reconstructive surgery was required despite successful distraction in the majority of patients. Although DO has a low significance with respect to overall patient counts the method is a powerful tool within individual therapeutic concepts for the surgical correction of craniofacial anomalies that are characterized by skeletal deficiencies and should be seen as addendum to other surgical options. Predictable and stable results can be expected if the basic principles of the method are regarded.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniomaxillofacial skeleton; Distraction osteogenesis; Significance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629798     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

Review 1.  Craniofacial malformations and the orthodontist.

Authors:  A Akram; M M McKnight; H Bellardie; V Beale; R D Evans
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Contemporary Correction of Dentofacial Anomalies: A Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Nicolai Adolphs; Nicole Ernst; Erwin Keeve; Bodo Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-28

3.  Contribution of the periosteum to mandibular distraction.

Authors:  Alexandre Debelmas; Arnaud Picard; Natacha Kadlub; Jean Boisson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multidisciplinary oral rehabilitation of an adolescent suffering from juvenile Gorlin-Goltz syndrome - a case report.

Authors:  Manfred Nilius; Jürgen Kohlhase; Johann Lorenzen; Günter Lauer; Matthias C Schulz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  Role of distraction osteogenesis in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Nicole Ernst; Nicolai Adolphs
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2016-12-08

6.  Transpalatal distraction for the management of maxillary constriction in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Nicolai Adolphs; Nicole Ernst; Bodo Hoffmeister; Jan-Dirk Raguse
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.