Literature DB >> 24629709

Non-enzymatic dissociation of human mesenchymal stromal cells improves chemokine-dependent migration and maintains immunosuppressive function.

Abhilok Garg1, Diarmaid D Houlihan2, Victoria Aldridge2, Shankar Suresh2, Ka Kit Li2, Andrew L King2, Rupesh Sutaria2, Janine Fear2, Ricky H Bhogal2, Patricia F Lalor2, Philip N Newsome3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) can suppress inflammation; therefore their therapeutic potential is being explored in clinical trials. Poor engraftment of infused MSC limits their therapeutic utility; this may be caused by MSC processing before infusion, in particular the method of their detachment from culture.
METHODS: Enzymatic methods of detaching MSC (Accutase and TrypLE) were compared with non-enzymatic methods (Cell Dissociation Buffer [CDB], ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and scraping) for their effect on MSC viability, chemokine receptor expression, multi-potency, immunomodulation and chemokine-dependent migration.
RESULTS: TrypLE detachment preserved MSC viability and tri-lineage potential compared with non-enzymatic methods; however, this resulted in near complete loss of surface chemokine receptor expression. Of the non-enzymatic methods, CDB detachment preserved the highest viability while retaining significant tri-lineage differentiation potential. Once re-plated, CDB-detached MSC regained their original morphology and reached confluence, unlike with the use of other non-enzymatic methods. Viability was significantly reduced with the use of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and further reduced with the use of cell scraping. Addition of 1% serum during CDB detachment led to higher MSC numbers entering autophagy and increased MSC recovery after re-plating. TrypLE and CDB-detached MSC suppressed CD3(+)CD4(+)CD25(-) T-cell proliferation, although TrypLE-detached MSC exhibited superior suppression at 1:20 ratio. CDB detachment retained surface chemokine receptor expression and consequently increased migration to CCL22, CXCL12 and CCL4, in contrast with TrypLE-detached MSC.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that non-enzymatic detachment of MSC with the use of CDB minimizes the negative impact on cell viability, multipotency and immunomodulation while retaining chemokine-dependent migration, which may be of importance in MSC delivery and engraftment in sites of injury. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemokine receptors; differentiation; immune suppression; mesenchymal stromal cells; migration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629709     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  10 in total

1.  CXCR4 expression by mesenchymal stromal cells is lost after use of enzymatic dissociation agents, but preserved by use of non-enzymatic methods.

Authors:  Burcu Pervin; Gözde Aydın; Trudi Visser; Duygu Uçkan-Çetinkaya; Fatima S F Aerts-Kaya
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Interaction of reactive astrocytes with type I collagen induces astrocytic scar formation through the integrin-N-cadherin pathway after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Masamitsu Hara; Kazu Kobayakawa; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Hiromi Kumamaru; Kazuya Yokota; Takeyuki Saito; Ken Kijima; Shingo Yoshizaki; Katsumi Harimaya; Yasuharu Nakashima; Seiji Okada
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Multi-Spheroid-Loaded Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Carrier Preserves Its Spheroid Shape and Improves In Vivo Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Delivery and Engraftment.

Authors:  Jie Hyun Kim; Jun Yong Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 4.  Microfluidic Sample Preparation for Single Cell Analysis.

Authors:  Sanjin Hosic; Shashi K Murthy; Abigail N Koppes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Engrafted Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Promote Functional Recovery through Synapse Reorganization with Spared Host Neurons after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Kazuya Yokota; Kazu Kobayakawa; Kensuke Kubota; Atsushi Miyawaki; Hideyuki Okano; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Yukihide Iwamoto; Seiji Okada
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 7.765

6.  A thermoresponsive and magnetic colloid for 3D cell expansion and reconfiguration.

Authors:  Aram Saeed; Nora Francini; Lisa White; James Dixon; Toby Gould; Hassan Rashidi; Racha Cheikh Al Ghanami; Veronika Hruschka; Heinz Redl; Brian R Saunders; Cameron Alexander; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Effect of Microenvironment on Differentiation of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Hepatocytes In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Gai Xue; Xiaolei Han; Xin Ma; Honghai Wu; Yabin Qin; Jianfang Liu; Yuqin Hu; Yang Hong; Yanning Hou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Oriented immobilization of basic fibroblast growth factor: Bioengineered surface design for the expansion of human mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Ajay Shakya; Eiji Imado; Phuong Kim Nguyen; Tamamo Matsuyama; Kotaro Horimoto; Isao Hirata; Koichi Kato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluation of Strategies Aimed at Improving Liver Progenitor Cell Rolling and Subsequent Adhesion to the Endothelium.

Authors:  Pierre Edouard Dollet; Mei Ju Hsu; Jérôme Ambroise; Milena Rozzi; Joachim Ravau; Floriane André; Jonathan Evraerts; Mustapha Najimi; Etienne Sokal; Catherine Lombard
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Pathological changes of distal motor neurons after complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kazuya Yokota; Kensuke Kubota; Kazu Kobayakawa; Takeyuki Saito; Masamitsu Hara; Ken Kijima; Takeshi Maeda; Hiroyuki Katoh; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Yasuharu Nakashima; Seiji Okada
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.041

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.