Yuan Zhou1, Jessica S Ancker2, Mandar Upadhye3, Nicolette M McGeorge3, Theresa K Guarrera3, Sudeep Hegde3, Peter W Crane4, Rollin J Fairbanks5, Ann M Bisantz3, Rainu Kaushal6, Li Lin7. 1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University at Buffalo 339b Bell Hall Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. yuanzhou@buffalo.edu. 2. Departments of Pediatrics and Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA. 3. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. 5. National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Institute for Innovation, MedStar Health, Washington, DC 20008, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. 6. Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork, NY 10065, USA. 7. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA; Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative Investigators.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of health information technology (HIT) on efficiency and workload among clinical and nonclinical staff has been debated, with conflicting evidence about whether electronic health records (EHRs) increase or decrease effort. None of this paper to date, however, examines the effect of interoperability quantitatively using discrete event simulation techniques. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of EHR systems with various levels of interoperability on day-to-day tasks and operations of ambulatory physician offices. METHODS: Interviews and observations were used to collect workflow data from 12 adult primary and specialty practices. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to represent patient flows and clinical and administrative tasks of physicians and staff members. RESULTS: High levels of EHR interoperability were associated with reduced time spent by providers on four tasks: preparing lab reports, requesting lab orders, prescribing medications, and writing referrals. The implementation of an EHR was associated with less time spent by administrators but more time spent by physicians, compared with time spent at paper-based practices. In addition, the presence of EHRs and of interoperability did not significantly affect the time usage of registered nurses or the total visit time and waiting time of patients. CONCLUSION: This paper suggests that the impact of using HIT on clinical and nonclinical staff work efficiency varies, however, overall it appears to improve time efficiency more for administrators than for physicians and nurses.
BACKGROUND: The effect of health information technology (HIT) on efficiency and workload among clinical and nonclinical staff has been debated, with conflicting evidence about whether electronic health records (EHRs) increase or decrease effort. None of this paper to date, however, examines the effect of interoperability quantitatively using discrete event simulation techniques. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of EHR systems with various levels of interoperability on day-to-day tasks and operations of ambulatory physician offices. METHODS: Interviews and observations were used to collect workflow data from 12 adult primary and specialty practices. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to represent patient flows and clinical and administrative tasks of physicians and staff members. RESULTS: High levels of EHR interoperability were associated with reduced time spent by providers on four tasks: preparing lab reports, requesting lab orders, prescribing medications, and writing referrals. The implementation of an EHR was associated with less time spent by administrators but more time spent by physicians, compared with time spent at paper-based practices. In addition, the presence of EHRs and of interoperability did not significantly affect the time usage of registered nurses or the total visit time and waiting time of patients. CONCLUSION: This paper suggests that the impact of using HIT on clinical and nonclinical staff work efficiency varies, however, overall it appears to improve time efficiency more for administrators than for physicians and nurses.
Authors: Lauren F Laker; Elham Torabi; Daniel J France; Craig M Froehle; Eric J Goldlust; Nathan R Hoot; Parastu Kasaie; Michael S Lyons; Laura H Barg-Walkow; Michael J Ward; Robert L Wears Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Robert L Phillips; Andrew W Bazemore; Jennifer E DeVoe; Thomas J Weida; Alex H Krist; Michael F Dulin; Frances E Biagioli Journal: Fam Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Katharine T Adams; Jessica L Howe; Allan Fong; Joseph S Puthumana; Kathryn M Kellogg; Michael Gaunt; Raj M Ratwani Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Danny T Y Wu; Catherine Xu; Abraham Kim; Shwetha Bindhu; Kenneth E Mah; Mark H Eckman Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Nils Pfeuffer; Angelika Beyer; Peter Penndorf; Maren Leiz; Franziska Radicke; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Neeltje van den Berg Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-09-15